Suppr超能文献

多分支支架治疗胸主动脉瘤的血管内修复的性别相关解剖可行性差异。

Sex-Related Anatomical Feasibility Differences in Endovascular Repair of Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms With a Multibranched Stent-Graft.

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, "Vita-Salute" San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Endovasc Ther. 2021 Apr;28(2):283-294. doi: 10.1177/1526602820964916. Epub 2020 Oct 13.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the potential anatomical feasibility of using the off-the-shelf multibranched Zenith t-Branch for the treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) in female patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 268 patients (median age 68 years; 69 women) with degenerative TAAA treated at a single institution by means of open or endovascular repair between 2007 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed to determine the feasibility of using the Zenith t-Branch based on the manufacturer's instructions for use. The factors determining overall anatomical feasibility were divided into vascular access, aortic anatomy, and visceral vessels. The results were stratified by sex and compared. A logistic regression model was constructed to determine any association between feasibility and clinical factors or potential confounding variables; results are expressed as the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

The overall anatomical feasibility was 39% (22% women vs 45% men, p=0.001). The feasibility was negatively influenced by female sex (p<0.001) in multivariable analysis (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.5 to 5.4, p=0.001). Vascular access feasibility was 82% (61% women vs 89% men, p<0.001). Aorta feasibility was 65% (52% women vs 69% men, p<0.001), and visceral vessel feasibility was 74% (78% women vs 73% men, p=0.260). An access diameter ≤8.5 mm excluded 17% of the patients (39% women vs 9% men, p<0.001). The aortic feasibility was limited by the infrarenal aortic diameter in 16% of patients (45% women vs 6% men, p<0.001) and the aortic lumen at the visceral vessels in 17% patients (19% women vs 17% men, p=0.741). The visceral vessel feasibility was mainly limited by inadequate numbers or diameters of target vessels. Location and orientation of the target vessels were adequate in 96% of patients.

CONCLUSION

A little more than a third of an all-comers cohort of patients with degenerative TAAA could have been treated with on-label use of the Zenith t-Branch. However, only 22% of women could have been treated because of sex-related anatomical limitations. New generations of multibranched devices should address these differences.

摘要

目的

评估使用市售多分支 Zenith t-Branch 治疗女性胸主动脉瘤(TAAA)的潜在解剖学可行性。

材料与方法

回顾性分析了 2007 年至 2019 年间在一家医疗机构接受开放或血管内修复治疗的 268 例退行性 TAAA 患者(中位年龄 68 岁,女性 69 例),以确定根据制造商使用说明使用 Zenith t-Branch 的可行性。决定整体解剖可行性的因素分为血管入路、主动脉解剖和内脏血管。按性别进行分层并比较。构建逻辑回归模型,以确定可行性与临床因素或潜在混杂变量之间的任何关联;结果以比值比(OR)表示,置信区间(CI)为 95%。

结果

整体解剖学可行性为 39%(女性 22%,男性 45%,p=0.001)。多变量分析显示,女性性别对可行性有负面影响(p<0.001)(OR 2.9,95%CI 1.5 至 5.4,p=0.001)。血管入路可行性为 82%(女性 61%,男性 89%,p<0.001)。主动脉可行性为 65%(女性 52%,男性 69%,p<0.001),内脏血管可行性为 74%(女性 78%,男性 73%,p=0.260)。直径≤8.5mm 的入路排除了 17%的患者(女性 39%,男性 9%,p<0.001)。16%的患者(女性 45%,男性 6%,p<0.001)的肾下主动脉直径和 17%的患者(女性 19%,男性 17%,p=0.741)的内脏血管处主动脉管腔限制了主动脉的可行性。内脏血管的可行性主要受到目标血管数量或直径不足的限制。96%的患者目标血管的位置和方向都足够。

结论

退行性 TAAA 患者的全队列中,略多于三分之一的患者可以按照标签使用 Zenith t-Branch 进行治疗。然而,由于与性别相关的解剖学限制,只有 22%的女性可以接受治疗。新一代多分支设备应解决这些差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验