From the Interventional Neuroradiology Department (W.B., S.S., M.P., C.D.), Rothschild Foundation Hospital, Paris; Interventional Neuroradiology Department (C.D.), Gui de Chauliac Hospital, Montpellier; Neurology Department (J.C.), Saint-Antoine Hospital, Paris, France; and Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology (M.S., D.D., R.F.), and Department of Radiology (R.I.A., R.F.), The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and University of Ottawa, Canada.
Neurology. 2021 Jan 5;96(1):e10-e18. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010999. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
To determine whether the ABC/2 method could accurately and reliably measure infarct volume and guide thrombectomy decision in acute stroke cases presenting with late or unknown onset.
Four physicians who routinely use MRI for acute stroke imaging, blinded to the RAPID results, measured the diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) infarct volume using the ABC/2 method. Measurements with ABC/2 (the index test) were compared with RAPID (the reference standard) to calculate sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy measures for various volume cutpoints. Thrombectomy decisions based on RAPID and raters' measurements using the criteria from the Diffusion-Weighted Imaging or Computerized Tomography Perfusion Assessment With Clinical Mismatch in the Triage of Wake-Up and Late-Presenting Strokes Undergoing Neurointervention With Trevo (DAWN) trial criteria were compared. Interrater and intrarater agreement was measured using kappa statistics.
Accuracy with the ABC/2 method was greater than 80% for each rater and each volume cut point. Interrater and intrarater agreement was substantial to excellent for each volume cut point. Treatment decisions with ABC/2 volume estimations showed strong interrater and intrarater agreement, and led to similar thrombectomy decisions compared with RAPID in more than 85% of cases.
DWI infarct volume measurement using ABC/2 method shows strong accuracy and reliability and may be an acceptable alternative to RAPID software for the application of DAWN criteria for thrombectomy decision-making.
确定 ABC/2 方法是否能够准确可靠地测量梗死体积,并指导急性脑卒中患者出现迟发或未知起病时的取栓决策。
四位常规使用 MRI 进行急性脑卒中成像的医生,在不了解 RAPID 结果的情况下,使用 ABC/2 方法测量弥散加权成像(DWI)梗死体积。将 ABC/2 测量值(指标试验)与 RAPID(参考标准)进行比较,计算出不同体积截止值的敏感性、特异性和准确性指标。根据 RAPID 和 DAWN 试验标准中用于评估醒后和迟发性脑卒中的弥散加权成像或计算机断层灌注评估与临床不匹配的分诊的溶栓标准(即 DAWN 试验标准),比较基于 RAPID 和评分者使用 DAWN 试验标准的测量值进行取栓决策的情况。使用kappa 统计测量组内和组间的一致性。
每位评分者和每个体积截止值的 ABC/2 方法的准确性均大于 80%。对于每个体积截止值,组内和组间的一致性均为中等至极好。基于 ABC/2 体积估计的治疗决策具有较强的组内和组间一致性,并且在超过 85%的情况下与 RAPID 相比导致类似的取栓决策。
使用 ABC/2 方法测量 DWI 梗死体积具有较强的准确性和可靠性,并且可能是 RAPID 软件在应用 DAWN 标准进行取栓决策的可接受替代方法。