Placì Sarah, Fischer Julia, Rakoczy Hannes
Cognitive Ethology Laboratory, German Primate Center, Kellnerweg 4, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.
Leibniz ScienceCampus Primate Cognition, German Primate Center, Kellnerweg 4, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Sep 9;7(9):191751. doi: 10.1098/rsos.191751. eCollection 2020 Sep.
Most statistical problems encountered throughout life require the ability to quantify probabilities based on proportions. Recent findings on the early ontogeny of this ability have been mixed: For example, when presented with jars containing preferred and less preferred items, 12-month-olds, but not 3- and 4-years-olds, seem to rely on the proportions of objects in the jars to predict the content of samples randomly drawn out of them. Given these contrasting findings, it remains unclear what the probabilistic reasoning abilities of young children are and how they develop. In our study, we addressed this question and tested, with identical methods across age groups and similar methods to previous studies, whether 12-month-olds and 3- and 4-years-olds rely on proportions of objects to estimate probabilities of random sampling events. Results revealed that neither infants nor preschoolers do. While preschoolers' performance is in line with previous findings, infants' performance is difficult to interpret given their failure in a control condition in which the outcomes happened with certainty rather than a graded probability. More systematic studies are needed to explain why infants succeeded in a previous study but failed in our study.
一生中遇到的大多数统计问题都需要具备根据比例来量化概率的能力。关于这种能力早期个体发育的最新研究结果参差不齐:例如,当面对装有偏好物品和不太偏好物品的罐子时,12个月大的婴儿似乎会依据罐子里物品的比例来预测从其中随机抽取的样本内容,而3岁和4岁的儿童则不会。鉴于这些相互矛盾的研究结果,幼儿的概率推理能力究竟如何以及它们是如何发展的仍不明确。在我们的研究中,我们解决了这个问题,并采用跨年龄组相同的方法以及与以往研究类似的方法,测试12个月大的婴儿以及3岁和4岁的儿童是否依靠物体比例来估计随机抽样事件的概率。结果显示,婴儿和学龄前儿童都不会。虽然学龄前儿童的表现与以往研究结果一致,但鉴于婴儿在结果确定而非有等级概率的控制条件下失败,他们的表现难以解释。需要更系统的研究来解释为什么婴儿在之前的一项研究中成功了,但在我们的研究中却失败了。