• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

满足女性对宫内节育器和避孕植入物停用的要求:对医生的探索性调查。

Meeting Women's Requests for Intrauterine Device and Contraceptive Implant Discontinuation: An Exploratory Survey of Physicians.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics Gynecology & Women's Health, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI (BK, ZK, KK, RS).

School of Education, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom (AM).

出版信息

Hawaii J Health Soc Welf. 2020 Oct 1;79(10):296-301.

PMID:33047103
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7547180/
Abstract

Long acting reversible contraceptives (LARC), including intrauterine devices (IUDs) and contraceptive implants, can support an individual in meeting their reproductive goals by allowing them to prevent pregnancy effectively. These devices can also limit an individual's control over reproduction because they generally require an in-person visit to a health care provider for removal. Returning for another visit may be logistically challenging for many individuals who may need to arrange for transportation, childcare, or take time off from work. Effectively negotiating with a provider to request removal may be additionally challenging for medically underserved and disenfranchised people who may not feel empowered to do so. The objective of this study was to assess providers' willingness to honor patients' requests for IUD and contraceptive implant removal on the day of the request. A survey was conducted in which clinicians were presented with scenarios of women requesting IUD or implant removal. Clinicians were asked what they were most likely to do. A total of 105 clinicians were surveyed. The responses of 60 clinicians who inserted IUDs and 57 who provided the contraceptive implant were included in the analysis. When asked about same-day removal of an IUD or implant from a dissatisfied patient who requested removal, 40% stated they would remove the implant, and 57% stated they would remove the IUD on the day of the request. Findings from this study suggest many clinicians would be unwilling or unable to accommodate a patient's request for device removal at the time of their visit. This delay or refusal represents a significant barrier for patients and has implications for reproductive autonomy that should be further explored.

摘要

长效可逆避孕措施(LARC),包括宫内节育器(IUD)和避孕植入物,可以通过有效避孕来帮助个人实现其生殖目标。这些设备也可以限制个人对生殖的控制,因为它们通常需要个人亲自去医疗机构进行取出。对于许多需要安排交通、儿童保育或请假的个人来说,返回进行另一次就诊可能在后勤上具有挑战性。对于医疗服务不足和被剥夺权利的人来说,有效地与提供者协商以请求取出可能会更加具有挑战性,因为他们可能没有能力这样做。本研究的目的是评估提供者在请求当天是否愿意尊重患者对 IUD 和避孕植入物取出的请求。进行了一项调查,其中向临床医生介绍了女性请求取出 IUD 或植入物的情况。临床医生被问到他们最有可能做什么。共有 105 名临床医生接受了调查。对插入 IUD 的 60 名临床医生和提供避孕植入物的 57 名临床医生的回复进行了分析。当被问及对要求取出的不满意患者当天取出 IUD 或植入物时,40%的人表示他们会取出植入物,57%的人表示他们会在请求当天取出 IUD。这项研究的结果表明,许多临床医生可能不愿意或无法在就诊时满足患者的设备取出请求。这种延迟或拒绝对患者来说是一个重大障碍,对生殖自主权产生了影响,应进一步探讨。

相似文献

1
Meeting Women's Requests for Intrauterine Device and Contraceptive Implant Discontinuation: An Exploratory Survey of Physicians.满足女性对宫内节育器和避孕植入物停用的要求:对医生的探索性调查。
Hawaii J Health Soc Welf. 2020 Oct 1;79(10):296-301.
2
Twelve-month contraceptive continuation and repeat pregnancy among young mothers choosing postdelivery contraceptive implants or postplacental intrauterine devices.选择产后避孕植入物或胎盘娩出后宫内节育器的年轻母亲的12个月避孕持续率及再次妊娠情况
Contraception. 2016 Feb;93(2):178-83. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.10.001. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
3
"I wish they could hold on a little longer": physicians' experiences with requests for early IUD removal.“我希望他们能再坚持久一点”:医生处理提前取出宫内节育器请求的经历
Contraception. 2017 Aug;96(2):106-110. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.05.007. Epub 2017 May 31.
4
Obstetrician-gynecologists and contraception: long-acting reversible contraception practices and education.妇产科医生与避孕:长效可逆避孕方法的应用与教育
Contraception. 2014 Jun;89(6):578-83. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
5
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 2 of 4).加拿大避孕共识(共四部分,第二部分)
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Nov;37(11):1033-9. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30054-8.
6
US family physicians' intrauterine and implantable contraception provision: results from a national survey.美国家庭医生提供宫内节育器和可植入式避孕措施的情况:一项全国性调查结果
Contraception. 2016 May;93(5):432-7. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.01.004. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
7
"She just told me to leave it": Women's experiences discussing early elective IUD removal.“她只是让我别管它”:女性讨论早期选择性取出宫内节育器的经历。
Contraception. 2016 Oct;94(4):357-61. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.04.012. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
8
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).加拿大避孕共识(共4部分,第1部分)
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Oct;37(10):936-42. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30033-0.
9
Predictors of Discontinuation of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Before 30 Months of Use by Adolescents and Young Women.青少年和年轻女性使用长效可逆避孕措施 30 个月前停药的预测因素。
J Adolesc Health. 2019 Aug;65(2):295-302. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.02.020. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
10
Characteristics of parents who think intrauterine devices or contraceptive implants are "best" for their daughter: An exploratory analysis in Dallas, Texas.父母认为宫内节育器或避孕植入物“最适合”女儿的特征:德克萨斯州达拉斯的探索性分析。
Contraception. 2023 Sep;125:110084. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110084. Epub 2023 May 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Who gets to decide? Assessing contraceptive coercion in health care settings.谁来决定?评估医疗环境中的避孕强制行为。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug;58(4):767-771. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14193. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
2
Intrauterine device self-removal practices during the COVID-19 pandemic among family planning clinics.COVID-19 大流行期间计划生育门诊的宫内节育器自行取出情况。
Contraception. 2023 Feb;118:109889. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.09.127. Epub 2022 Oct 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient-Perceived Autonomy and Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Use: A Qualitative Assessment in a Midwestern, University Community.患者感知的自主性与长效可逆避孕方法的使用:美国中西部大学社区的定性评估
Biores Open Access. 2018 Mar 1;7(1):25-32. doi: 10.1089/biores.2017.0037. eCollection 2018.
2
Practice Bulletin No. 186: Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Implants and Intrauterine Devices.实践公告第 186 号:长效可逆避孕:植入物和宫内节育器。
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;130(5):e251-e269. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002400.
3
Quality and Content of Patient-Provider Communication About Contraception: Differences by Race/Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Status.患者与提供者之间关于避孕的沟通质量和内容:按种族/民族和社会经济地位的差异。
Womens Health Issues. 2017 Sep-Oct;27(5):530-538. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
4
"She just told me to leave it": Women's experiences discussing early elective IUD removal.“她只是让我别管它”:女性讨论早期选择性取出宫内节育器的经历。
Contraception. 2016 Oct;94(4):357-61. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.04.012. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
5
Beyond Coercion: Let Us Grapple With Bias.超越强制手段:让我们应对偏见。
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Nov;126(5):915-916. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001116.
6
Contraception for adolescents.青少年避孕。
Pediatrics. 2014 Oct;134(4):e1257-81. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-2300.
7
Women or LARC first? Reproductive autonomy and the promotion of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods.先有女性还是先有长效可逆避孕法?生殖自主权与长效可逆避孕方法的推广。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014 Sep;46(3):171-5. doi: 10.1363/46e1614. Epub 2014 May 23.
8
Counseling about IUDs: a mixed-methods analysis.宫内节育器咨询:一项混合方法分析。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014 Sep;46(3):133-40. doi: 10.1363/46e0814. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
9
U.S. selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use, 2013.美国 2013 年避孕方法选择实践建议
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2014 Feb;23(2):108-11. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2013.4556. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
10
ACOG Committee opinion no. 554: reproductive and sexual coercion.美国妇产科医师学会委员会意见第 554 号:生殖和性胁迫。
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Feb;121(2 Pt 1):411-415. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000426427.79586.3b.