谁来决定？评估医疗环境中的避孕强制行为。
Who gets to decide? Assessing contraceptive coercion in health care settings.
机构信息
Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, Glen Head, New York, USA.
出版信息
Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug;58(4):767-771. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14193. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
Abstract
See related article by Swan et al.
摘要
见 Swan 等人的相关文章。
相似文献
1
Who gets to decide? Assessing contraceptive coercion in health care settings.谁来决定？评估医疗环境中的避孕强制行为。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug;58(4):767-771. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14193. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
2
Health care provider bias in the Appalachian region: The frequency and impact of contraceptive coercion.阿巴拉契亚地区医疗保健提供者的偏见：避孕强制的频率和影响。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug;58(4):772-780. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14157. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
3
Committee Opinion No. 419: Coercion Free Contraceptive Care.委员会意见第 419 号：非强制性避孕护理。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2021 Sep;43(9):1107-1111. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2021.07.001. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
4
Intersection of reproductive coercion and intimate partner violence: cross-sectional influences on women's contraceptive use in Burkina Faso, Côte d'Ivoire and Kenya.生育胁迫与亲密伴侣暴力的交叉：布基纳法索、科特迪瓦和肯尼亚对女性避孕使用的横断面影响。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 10;13(5):e065697. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065697.
5
Contraceptive Need, Intimate Partner Violence, and Reproductive Coercion Among Women Attending a Syringe Exchange Program.《针具交换项目中女性的避孕需求、亲密伴侣暴力和生殖胁迫》
J Addict Med. 2020 Jul/Aug;14(4):e70-e75. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000579.
6
Recognizing the Lasting Effects of Reproductive Coercion on Contraceptive Choices: Considering Trauma in a Pandemic Context.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021 Aug;30(8):1055-1056. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8963. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
7
Perception of coercion during contraceptive counseling among individuals with HIV.HIV 感染者在避孕咨询过程中的被强制感。
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2022 Dec;34:100791. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2022.100791. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
8
Types of Lifetime Reproductive Coercion and Current Contraceptive Use.终身生殖强迫的类型和当前避孕措施的使用。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021 Aug;30(8):1078-1085. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8784. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
9
Contraceptive method denial as downward contraceptive coercion: A mixed-methods mystery client study in Western Kenya.拒绝避孕方法等同于向下的避孕强制：肯尼亚西部一项混合方法神秘客户研究。
Contraception. 2022 Nov;115:53-58. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.06.014. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
10
Effects of a clinic-based reproductive empowerment intervention on proximal outcomes of contraceptive use, self-efficacy, attitudes, and awareness and use of survivor services: a cluster-controlled trial in Nairobi, Kenya.以诊所为基础的生殖权利赋权干预对避孕使用的近期结局、自我效能、态度以及对幸存者服务的认识和使用的影响：肯尼亚内罗毕的一项群组对照试验。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(1):2227371. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2227371.
引用本文的文献
1
What do oral contraceptive pills have to do with human rights abuses in sport?口服避孕药与体育界侵犯人权行为有何关联？
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2024 Dec;32(1):2342105. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2024.2342105. Epub 2024 May 24.
2
Reproductive decision making in women with medical comorbidities: a qualitative study.患有合并症的女性的生殖决策：一项定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Dec 11;23(1):848. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06093-4.
本文引用的文献
1
"She told me no, that you cannot change": Understanding provider refusal to remove contraceptive implants.“她告诉我不行，说无法改变”：理解医疗服务提供者拒绝取出避孕植入物的原因。
SSM Qual Res Health. 2022 Dec;2. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100154. Epub 2022 Aug 28.
2
Using the person-centered contraceptive counseling (PCCC) measure for quality improvement.使用以患者为中心的避孕咨询（PCCC）措施进行质量改进。
Contraception. 2023 Jul;123:110040. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110040. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
3
Health care provider bias in the Appalachian region: The frequency and impact of contraceptive coercion.阿巴拉契亚地区医疗保健提供者的偏见：避孕强制的频率和影响。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug;58(4):772-780. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14157. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
4
"I never went to see that doctor again": A qualitative study examining Australian women's experiences requesting removal of LARC within 12 months of insertion.“我再也不会去看那位医生了”：一项定性研究，调查澳大利亚女性在放置 LARC 后 12 个月内要求取出的经历。
Contraception. 2022 Jun;110:81-85. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.11.006. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
5
"We're a Little Biased": Medicine and the Management of Bias through the Case of Contraception.《有点偏见》：通过避孕案例看医学和偏见管理。
J Health Soc Behav. 2021 Jun;62(2):120-135. doi: 10.1177/00221465211003232. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
6
Exploring the physician's role in contraceptive counseling at the time of abortion in the US.探讨美国堕胎时医生在避孕咨询中的角色。
Contraception. 2021 May;103(5):316-321. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.01.014. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
7
The Fine Line Between Informing and Coercing: Community Health Center Clinicians' Approaches to Counseling Young People About IUDs.告知与强制之间的微妙界限：社区健康中心临床医生为年轻人提供宫内节育器咨询的方法。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2020 Dec;52(4):245-252. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12161. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
8
Meeting Women's Requests for Intrauterine Device and Contraceptive Implant Discontinuation: An Exploratory Survey of Physicians.满足女性对宫内节育器和避孕植入物停用的要求：对医生的探索性调查。
Hawaii J Health Soc Welf. 2020 Oct 1;79(10):296-301.
9
Hand-held device to remove a single-rod subdermal contraceptive implant: Results of early trials in Sweden.手持器械去除单棒皮下埋植避孕剂：瑞典早期试验结果。
Contraception. 2020 Dec;102(6):424-427. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.07.005. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
10
Reproductive Coercion Among African American Female Adolescents: Associations with Contraception and Sexually Transmitted Diseases.非裔美国少女的生殖强迫：与避孕和性传播疾病的关联。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021 Mar;30(3):429-437. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2019.8236. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
Zotero 插件