• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院获得性压力性损伤的发生率:巴西圣保罗市公立和私立医院成年患者的队列研究。

Incidence of hospital-acquired pressure injury: A cohort study of adults admitted to public and private hospitals in Sao Paulo, Brazil.

机构信息

School of Health Sciences Education, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Enterostomal Therapy Post-graduation Program, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Wound Repair Regen. 2021 Jan;29(1):79-86. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12868. Epub 2020 Oct 26.

DOI:10.1111/wrr.12868
PMID:33047424
Abstract

This study aimed to estimate the incidence of hospital-acquired pressure injury (PI) and its risk factors in inpatient and intensive care units of five hospitals (two public and three private) in the city of Sao Paulo, Brazil. A 6-month follow-up prospective cohort study (n = 1937) was conducted from April to September 2013. Baseline and follow-up measurements included demographic and care information, as well as risk assessments for both undernutrition (NRS-2002) and PI (Braden scale). Poisson regression with robust variance was used for data analysis. A total of 633 patients (32.60%) showed risk for PI. The incidence rate of PI was of 5.9% (9.9% in public hospitals vs 4.1% in private hospitals) and was higher in intensive care units, compared to inpatient care units (10% vs 5.7%, respectively). Risk for PI increased with age (RR = 1.05; 95% CI 1.04-1.07); was higher in in public hospitals, compared to private hospitals (RR = 4.39; 95% CI 2.92-6.61); in patients admitted for non-surgical reasons compared to those admitted for surgical reasons (RR = 1.91; 95% CI 1.12-3.27); in patients with longer hospital stays (RR = 1.04; 95% CI 1.03-1.06); high blood pressure (RR = 1.76; 95% CI 1.17-2.64); or had a risk for undernutrition (RR = 3.51; 95% CI 1.71-7.24). Higher scores in the Braden scale was associated with a decreased risk of PI (RR = 0.79; 95% CI 0.75-0.83). The results of our study indicate that 5.9% of all patients developed PI and that the most important factors that nurses should consider are: patient age, care setting, length of hospitalization, comorbidities, reason for admission and nutrition when planning and implementing PI-preventative actions.

摘要

本研究旨在评估巴西圣保罗市五家医院(两家公立医院和三家私立医院)住院和重症监护病房(ICU)的医院获得性压力性损伤(PI)发生率及其危险因素。这是一项为期 6 个月的前瞻性队列研究(n=1937),于 2013 年 4 月至 9 月进行。基线和随访测量包括人口统计学和护理信息,以及营养不良(NRS-2002)和 PI(Braden 量表)风险评估。使用具有稳健方差的泊松回归进行数据分析。共有 633 名患者(32.60%)存在 PI 风险。PI 的发病率为 5.9%(公立医院为 9.9%,私立医院为 4.1%),ICU 高于住院病房(分别为 10%和 5.7%)。PI 风险随年龄增加而增加(RR=1.05;95%CI 1.04-1.07);与私立医院相比,公立医院的风险更高(RR=4.39;95%CI 2.92-6.61);与因手术原因入院的患者相比,因非手术原因入院的患者风险更高(RR=1.91;95%CI 1.12-3.27);与住院时间较长的患者相比(RR=1.04;95%CI 1.03-1.06);高血压(RR=1.76;95%CI 1.17-2.64);或存在营养不良风险(RR=3.51;95%CI 1.71-7.24)。Braden 量表评分较高与 PI 风险降低相关(RR=0.79;95%CI 0.75-0.83)。我们的研究结果表明,所有患者中有 5.9%发生了 PI,护士在计划和实施 PI 预防措施时应考虑的最重要因素是:患者年龄、护理环境、住院时间、合并症、入院原因和营养状况。

相似文献

1
Incidence of hospital-acquired pressure injury: A cohort study of adults admitted to public and private hospitals in Sao Paulo, Brazil.医院获得性压力性损伤的发生率:巴西圣保罗市公立和私立医院成年患者的队列研究。
Wound Repair Regen. 2021 Jan;29(1):79-86. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12868. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
2
Risk for undernutrition and development of pressure injury in hospitalised patients in Brazil: Multicentre prospective cohort study.巴西住院患者营养不良和发生压疮的风险:多中心前瞻性队列研究。
Int Wound J. 2020 Aug;17(4):916-924. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13352. Epub 2020 Mar 29.
3
Availability and use of noninvasive ventilation in the intensive care units of public, private and teaching hospitals in the greater metropolitan area of São Paulo, Brazil.巴西圣保罗大都市区公立、私立和教学医院重症监护病房无创通气的可及性与使用情况
J Bras Pneumol. 2006 Jan-Feb;32(1):29-34. doi: 10.1590/s1806-37132006000100008.
4
Differences in sepsis treatment and outcomes between public and private hospitals in Brazil: a multicenter observational study.巴西公立和私立医院脓毒症治疗和结局的差异:一项多中心观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 6;8(6):e64790. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064790. Print 2013.
5
Pressure ulcers in the intensive care unit: the relationship between nursing workload, illness severity and pressure ulcer risk.重症监护病房的压疮:护理工作量、疾病严重程度与压疮风险之间的关系。
J Clin Nurs. 2013 Aug;22(15-16):2183-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04216.x. Epub 2012 Dec 7.
6
Characteristics, Outcomes, and Predictability of Critically Ill Obstetric Patients: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.危重症产科患者的特征、结局和可预测性:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。
Crit Care Med. 2015 Sep;43(9):1887-97. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001139.
7
The Challenge of Predicting Pressure Ulcers in Critically Ill Patients. A Multicenter Cohort Study.预测危重症患者压疮的挑战。一项多中心队列研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Oct;13(10):1775-1783. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201603-154OC.
8
[Hospital mortality and length of stay: comparison between public and private hospitals in Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo State, Brazil].[医院死亡率与住院时间:巴西圣保罗州里贝朗普雷图公立与私立医院的比较]
Cad Saude Publica. 2004;20 Suppl 2:S268-82. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2004000800021. Epub 2004 Dec 15.
9
Midrange Braden Subscale Scores Are Associated With Increased Risk for Pressure Injury Development Among Critical Care Patients.中等范围的Braden量表子量表评分与重症监护患者发生压疮的风险增加相关。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2017 Sep/Oct;44(5):420-428. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000349.
10
Factors associated with cesarean delivery in public and private hospitals in a city of northeastern Brazil: a cross-sectional study.巴西东北部某城市公立和私立医院剖宫产相关因素:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Jun 5;15:132. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0570-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors contributing to the quality of nursing care in Gauteng province hospitals.豪登省医院护理质量的影响因素。
Curationis. 2025 Mar 25;48(1):e1-e9. doi: 10.4102/curationis.v48i1.2653.
2
The prevalence and risk factors of pressure ulcers among residents of long-term care institutions: a case study of Kazakhstan.长期护理机构居民中压疮的患病率及危险因素:以哈萨克斯坦为例的一项病例研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 26;14(1):7105. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57721-8.