• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

呼吁开展交叉性医疗保健设计研究。

A Call for Intersectional Healthcare Design Research.

作者信息

Crocker Sophie

机构信息

528131HKS Architects, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

HERD. 2021 Jan;14(1):273-277. doi: 10.1177/1937586720964729. Epub 2020 Oct 13.

DOI:10.1177/1937586720964729
PMID:33047650
Abstract

The majority of patient experience research has been conducted in culturally Western contexts without controlling for cultural and demographic variation. Designers are left with little choice but to apply contextually specific and demographically neutral research to a wide range of healthcare systems, cultural contexts, and demographic conditions. It is possible that some research will transfer and generate the intended outcomes. However, it is likely much will not, and there is currently little way of knowing what does and does not work in environments outside of those where the study was conducted. Healthcare design research conducted in a variety of sociocultural conditions could help to ensure healthcare facilities are designed to best suit the sociodemographic needs of their users and support the wider public health ambitions of the health system. Health inequalities that exist within and between nations are well-known, and while the systems and structures that inform these inequalities are complex, it is likely design can play a role in ensuring these inequalities are not exacerbated by the environments in which care is provided. In other words, while healthcare designers may not be able to affect the geographies of inequality outside health facilities, they should endeavor to impact those within. It is critical that studies be repeated in a wide variety of conditions and that design decisions be openly published, shared, and discussed to create a discourse around methods, ethics, and comparative studies in the field of Intersectional Healthcare Design Research.

摘要

大多数患者体验研究是在西方文化背景下进行的,没有考虑文化和人口统计学差异。设计师别无选择,只能将特定背景且不受人口统计学影响的研究应用于广泛的医疗系统、文化背景和人口状况。有些研究可能会适用并产生预期结果。然而,很可能许多研究并不适用,而且目前几乎无法知道在研究开展环境之外的环境中,哪些方法有效、哪些无效。在各种社会文化条件下进行医疗设计研究有助于确保医疗设施的设计最能满足其使用者的社会人口需求,并支持卫生系统更广泛的公共卫生目标。国家内部和国家之间存在的健康不平等现象众所周知,虽然导致这些不平等的系统和结构很复杂,但设计很可能在确保这些不平等不会因提供医疗服务的环境而加剧方面发挥作用。换句话说,虽然医疗设计师可能无法影响医疗机构之外的不平等地域,但他们应努力影响机构内部的不平等。至关重要的是,要在各种条件下重复进行研究,并公开公布、分享和讨论设计决策,以围绕交叉医疗设计研究领域的方法、伦理和比较研究展开讨论。

相似文献

1
A Call for Intersectional Healthcare Design Research.呼吁开展交叉性医疗保健设计研究。
HERD. 2021 Jan;14(1):273-277. doi: 10.1177/1937586720964729. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
5
"Is the doctor God to punish me?!" An intersectional examination of disrespectful and abusive care during childbirth against single mothers in Tunisia.“难道医生是上帝来惩罚我吗?!”对突尼斯针对单身母亲分娩期间不尊重和虐待性护理的交叉性审视。
Reprod Health. 2017 Mar 4;14(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0290-9.
6
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
7
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
8
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
9
A research roadmap for complementary and alternative medicine - what we need to know by 2020.补充和替代医学研究路线图——到2020年我们需要了解的内容。
Forsch Komplementmed. 2014;21(2):e1-16. doi: 10.1159/000360744. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
10
Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques.获取公众对医疗保健的偏好:技术的系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(5):1-186. doi: 10.3310/hta5050.

引用本文的文献

1
Application and evolution of design in oral health: A systematic mapping study with an interactive evidence map.口腔健康设计的应用与演变:一项基于交互证据图的系统综述研究。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2024 Feb;52(1):1-12. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12892. Epub 2023 Aug 1.