• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口腔健康设计的应用与演变:一项基于交互证据图的系统综述研究。

Application and evolution of design in oral health: A systematic mapping study with an interactive evidence map.

机构信息

Division of Industrial Design, School of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

School of Dentistry, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2024 Feb;52(1):1-12. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12892. Epub 2023 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1111/cdoe.12892
PMID:37526262
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10952138/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

There is increasing recognition of the value and capabilities of design in healthcare. Beyond the development of medical devices, design is increasingly being applied to intangible, complex and systemic healthcare problems. However, there is limited evidence on the use of design specifically in the field of oral health. This systematic mapping study aims to collate and catalogue evidence of design in oral health.

METHODS

A systematic search of academic databases and grey literature was performed. Duplicate results were removed, and publications relating to the same project were grouped. Reviewers from design and oral health independently screened a sample of the dataset. Projects of both relevance to oral health, and with input from a designer or clear implementation of a design methodology or approach were included. Projects were coded and plotted on a novel interactive evidence map.

RESULTS

119 design and oral health projects were included between 1973 and 2022. Interventional (n = 94, 79%), empirical (n = 46, 39%), methodological (n = 35, 29%) and theoretical (n = 7, 6%) design contributions were identified across the projects. The projects were categorized by four orders of design: first-graphics (n = 6, 5%), second-products (n = 41, 34%), third-interactions (n = 70, 59%), and fourth-systems (n = 2, 2%). Design was found in a diverse range of contexts in oral health; most commonly being relevant to general patients (n = 61, 51%), and for use in general dental practice (n = 56, 47%). Further design outcome categories (digital material; printed material; object; room or space; apparel; process; smart device; tangible interface; graphical interface; virtual reality; service; policy; system) and oral health themes (oral health literacy; oral care training; dental clinic design; dental instruments and equipment; personal oral care; dental appliance; clinician health and productivity; clinical information systems; informed consent; oral health promotion and prevention; oral care training; patient interactions and experience) were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel interactive evidence map of design in oral health created enables ongoing and open-ended multivariant documentation and analysis of the evidence, as well as identification of strategic opportunities. Future research and policy implications include; recognition and engagement with the full capabilities of design; integration of design experts; fostering inclusive engagement and collaboration; disentangling patient and public involvement; advancing human-centred systems approaches; adopting design-led approaches for policy-making.

摘要

目的

人们越来越认识到设计在医疗保健中的价值和能力。除了医疗器械的开发,设计越来越多地应用于无形的、复杂的和系统的医疗保健问题。然而,关于设计在口腔健康领域的具体应用的证据有限。本系统制图研究旨在整理和分类口腔健康设计的证据。

方法

对学术数据库和灰色文献进行了系统搜索。去除重复项,并将同一项目的出版物进行分组。来自设计和口腔健康领域的评审员独立筛选了数据集的一部分。纳入了与口腔健康相关且有设计师参与或明确实施设计方法或方法的项目。对项目进行编码,并在一个新的交互式证据图上进行绘制。

结果

1973 年至 2022 年期间共纳入 119 项设计和口腔健康项目。干预(n=94,79%)、经验(n=46,39%)、方法(n=35,29%)和理论(n=7,6%)设计贡献在项目中得到了识别。这些项目按四个设计层次进行分类:第一级图形(n=6,5%)、第二级产品(n=41,34%)、第三级交互(n=70,59%)和第四级系统(n=2,2%)。设计在口腔健康的各种环境中都有发现;最常见的是与一般患者相关(n=61,51%),并用于一般牙科实践(n=56,47%)。进一步的设计成果类别(数字材料;印刷材料;物体;房间或空间;服装;过程;智能设备;有形界面;图形界面;虚拟现实;服务;政策;系统)和口腔健康主题(口腔健康素养;口腔保健培训;牙科诊所设计;牙科仪器和设备;个人口腔保健;牙科器具;临床医生健康和生产力;临床信息系统;知情同意;口腔健康促进和预防;口腔保健培训;患者互动和体验)被确定。

结论

创建的口腔健康设计交互式证据图能够对证据进行持续的、开放式的多变量记录和分析,并确定战略机会。未来的研究和政策影响包括:认识和参与设计的全部能力;整合设计专家;促进包容和协作的参与;解开患者和公众参与的束缚;推进以人为本的系统方法;采用以设计为主导的决策方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e2b/10952138/43ea66a54cbb/CDOE-52-1-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e2b/10952138/83948222eae4/CDOE-52-1-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e2b/10952138/a31738d6cffd/CDOE-52-1-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e2b/10952138/6f46c453d435/CDOE-52-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e2b/10952138/43ea66a54cbb/CDOE-52-1-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e2b/10952138/83948222eae4/CDOE-52-1-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e2b/10952138/a31738d6cffd/CDOE-52-1-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e2b/10952138/6f46c453d435/CDOE-52-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e2b/10952138/43ea66a54cbb/CDOE-52-1-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Application and evolution of design in oral health: A systematic mapping study with an interactive evidence map.口腔健康设计的应用与演变:一项基于交互证据图的系统综述研究。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2024 Feb;52(1):1-12. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12892. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
6
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
7
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
8
Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.改善物质使用障碍康复期学生行为和学业成果的康复学校:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;14(1):1-86. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.9. eCollection 2018.
9
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
10
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.

引用本文的文献

1
A Communication Toolkit to Assist Families Access Dental Care Services in Scotland: A Qualitative Evaluation.一个协助苏格兰家庭获得牙科护理服务的沟通工具包:一项定性评估。
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Feb 14;13(2):80. doi: 10.3390/dj13020080.
2
Patient preferences and willingness to pay for dental services: a systematic review.患者对牙科服务的偏好及支付意愿:一项系统评价
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Feb 13;25(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05520-6.
3
Developing SysteMatic: Prevention, precision and equity by design for people living with multiple long-term conditions.

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence and gap maps: a comparison of different approaches.证据与差距图:不同方法的比较
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 12;14(1):1-38. doi: 10.4073/cmdp.2018.2. eCollection 2018.
2
Evolution and development of methodologies in social and behavioural science research in relation to oral health.社会和行为科学研究方法在口腔健康方面的演变和发展。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2023 Feb;51(1):46-57. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12821. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
3
An opportunity for inclusive and human-centred design.一个具有包容性和以人文本的设计机会。
系统性发展:通过设计实现针对患有多种慢性病患者的预防、精准医疗与公平性。
J Multimorb Comorb. 2024 Sep 30;14:26335565241272682. doi: 10.1177/26335565241272682. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
4
Adolescents' views on oral health care and promotion in Norway: everyday practices, recommendations, and future visions.挪威青少年对口腔保健与推广的看法:日常实践、建议及未来愿景
Front Oral Health. 2024 Apr 9;5:1290652. doi: 10.3389/froh.2024.1290652. eCollection 2024.
5
Investigating hope in oral health promotion for adolescents: an exploratory study based on observations at the dental clinic.探究青少年口腔健康促进中的希望:一项基于牙科诊所观察的探索性研究。
Front Oral Health. 2024 Feb 16;5:1303933. doi: 10.3389/froh.2024.1303933. eCollection 2024.
Br Dent J. 2022 Oct;233(8):607-612. doi: 10.1038/s41415-022-5101-1. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
4
Complexity in Health: Can Design Help Support Interdisciplinary Solutions?健康复杂性:设计能否助力支持跨学科解决方案?
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2021 Nov 29;9(Suppl 2):S217-S225. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00222.
5
Health Care 4.0: A Vision for Smart and Connected Health Care.医疗保健4.0:智能互联医疗保健愿景
IISE Trans Healthc Syst Eng. 2021;11(3):171-180. doi: 10.1080/24725579.2021.1884627. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
6
Who should I involve in my research and why? Patients, carers or the public?我应该让谁参与我的研究,为什么?患者、护理人员还是公众?
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jun 14;7(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00282-1.
7
FDI Vision 2030: Delivering Optimal Oral Health for All.《2030年国际牙科联合会愿景:为所有人提供最佳口腔健康》
Int Dent J. 2021 Feb;71(1):3-4. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2020.12.026. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
8
The wicked problem of the oral health care system.口腔保健系统的棘手问题。
J Public Health Dent. 2020 Sep;80 Suppl 2:S5-S7. doi: 10.1111/jphd.12424.
9
Innovating health care: key characteristics of human-centered design.创新医疗保健:以人为本设计的关键特征。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Jan 12;33(Supplement_1):37-44. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa127.
10
A Call for Intersectional Healthcare Design Research.呼吁开展交叉性医疗保健设计研究。
HERD. 2021 Jan;14(1):273-277. doi: 10.1177/1937586720964729. Epub 2020 Oct 13.