• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

议论文中的论证的可视化分析。

Visual Analysis of Argumentation in Essays.

出版信息

IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2021 Feb;27(2):1139-1148. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2020.3030425. Epub 2021 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1109/TVCG.2020.3030425
PMID:33048728
Abstract

This paper presents a visual analytics system for exploring, analyzing and comparing argument structures in essay corpora. We provide an overview of the corpus by a list of ArguLines which represent the argument units of each essay by a sequence of glyphs. Each glyph encodes the stance, the depth and the relative position of an argument unit. The overview can be ordered in various ways to reveal patterns and outliers. Subsets of essays can be selected and analyzed in detail using the Argument Unit Occurrence Tree which aggregates the argument structures using hierarchical histograms. This hierarchical view facilitates the estimation of statistics and trends concerning the progression of the argumentation in the essays. It also provides insights into the commonalities and differences between selected subsets. The text view is the necessary textual basis to verify conclusions from the other views and the annotation process. Linking the views and interaction techniques for visual filtering, studying the evolution of stance within a subset of essays and scrutinizing the order of argumentative units enable a deep analysis of essay corpora. Our expert reviews confirmed the utility of the system and revealed detailed and previously unknown information about the argumentation in our sample corpus.

摘要

本文提出了一种用于探索、分析和比较论文语料库中论点结构的可视分析系统。我们通过一个由 ArguLines 组成的列表提供了语料库的概述,这些 ArguLines 通过一系列符号来表示每篇论文的论点单元。每个符号都对论点单元的立场、深度和相对位置进行编码。概述可以通过各种方式进行排序,以揭示模式和异常值。使用论点单元出现树可以选择和详细分析子集的论文,该树使用层次直方图对论点结构进行聚合。这种层次视图有助于估计与论文中论证进展有关的统计数据和趋势。它还提供了关于所选子集之间的共性和差异的见解。文本视图是从其他视图验证结论和注释过程的必要文本基础。链接视图和用于视觉过滤的交互技术、研究一个子集内立场的演变以及仔细研究论证单元的顺序,可以对论文语料库进行深入分析。我们的专家评论证实了该系统的实用性,并揭示了我们样本语料库中论证的详细和以前未知的信息。

相似文献

1
Visual Analysis of Argumentation in Essays.议论文中的论证的可视化分析。
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2021 Feb;27(2):1139-1148. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2020.3030425. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
2
Annotating Argument Schemes.注释论证模式
Argumentation. 2021;35(1):101-139. doi: 10.1007/s10503-020-09519-x. Epub 2020 May 7.
3
Fusion weighted features and BiLSTM-attention model for argument mining of EFL writing.用于外语写作论证挖掘的融合加权特征与双向长短期记忆网络注意力模型
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 25;14:1049266. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1049266. eCollection 2023.
4
An empirical study on the scaffolding Chinese university students' English argumentative writing based on toulmin model.基于图尔敏模型对中国大学生英语议论文写作支架搭建的实证研究
Heliyon. 2022 Dec 15;8(12):e12199. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12199. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
Didactics of written argumentation with Spanish as a Foreign Language (SFL) students at university level in Algeria.阿尔及利亚针对大学阶段以西班牙语为外语的学生的书面论证教学法
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 21;14:1192823. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1192823. eCollection 2023.
6
Argumentation schemes, fallacies, and evidence in politicians' argumentative tweets-A coded dataset.政治家论证性推文的论证方案、谬误与证据——一个编码数据集
Data Brief. 2022 Jul 30;44:108501. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2022.108501. eCollection 2022 Oct.
7
Visual analysis of online social media to open up the investigation of stance phenomena.通过对在线社交媒体进行可视化分析来开展对立场现象的调查。
Inf Vis. 2016 Apr;15(2):93-116. doi: 10.1177/1473871615575079. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
8
Toward an experimental account of argumentation: the case of the slippery slope and the ad hominem arguments.走向论证的实验性阐释:滑坡论证与诉诸人身论证的案例
Front Psychol. 2014 Dec 15;5:1420. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01420. eCollection 2014.
9
The Argument Web: an Online Ecosystem of Tools, Systems and Services for Argumentation.
Philos Technol. 2017;30(2):137-160. doi: 10.1007/s13347-017-0260-8. Epub 2017 May 11.
10
Evaluating and selecting arguments in the context of higher order uncertainty.在高阶不确定性的背景下评估和选择论据。
Front Artif Intell. 2023 May 19;6:1133998. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1133998. eCollection 2023.