Laine D C, Thomas W, Levitt M D, Bantle J P
Diabetes Care. 1987 Jul-Aug;10(4):387-94. doi: 10.2337/diacare.10.4.387.
To determine whether the diabetic exchange lists or the glycemic index of foods better predicts postprandial responses to carbohydrate-containing foods eaten as part of a mixed meal, three test meals were developed and fed to 12 subjects with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) and 13 healthy subjects. Each test meal contained exactly the same exchanges (1 milk, 4 starch, 2 fruit, 2 meat, 3 fat, 1 vegetable). In one meal, foods of high glycemic index (GI) were used, in a second meal, foods of intermediate GI were used, and in a third meal foods of low GI were used. The total GIs of the meals were: high, 184; intermediate, 131; and low, 107, thus predicting responses to intermediate and low GI, which were 71 and 58%, respectively, of the responses to high GI. Although some of the observed differences in the glycemic responses to the test meals were statistically significant, primarily in healthy subjects, the differences were usually much less than predicted by the GIs of the meals. In NIDDM subjects, peak postprandial plasma glucose, plasma glucose area, plasma glucose area increment, and mean plasma glucose responses after intermediate and low GI were greater than 90% of the corresponding responses to high GI. In healthy subjects, only the plasma glucose area increment after the low-GI meal was close to the predicted response. High GI produced significantly greater insulin responses than low GI in healthy subjects. We conclude that the diabetic exchange lists more accurately predict postprandial responses to carbohydrate-containing foods eaten as part of a mixed meal than does the GI of foods.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
为了确定糖尿病食物交换份法或食物血糖生成指数能否更好地预测含碳水化合物食物作为混合餐一部分食用后的餐后反应,研究人员设计了三种测试餐,并将其提供给12名非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(NIDDM)患者和13名健康受试者。每餐都包含完全相同的食物交换份(1份奶类、4份淀粉类、2份水果、2份肉类、3份脂肪、1份蔬菜)。一餐使用高血糖生成指数(GI)的食物,另一餐使用中等GI的食物,第三餐使用低GI的食物。三餐的总GI分别为:高,184;中等,131;低,107,由此预测中等和低GI餐的反应分别为高GI餐反应的71%和58%。尽管观察到的测试餐血糖反应差异在统计学上具有显著性,主要体现在健康受试者中,但这些差异通常远小于餐食GI所预测的差异。在NIDDM患者中,中等和低GI餐后的餐后血浆葡萄糖峰值、血浆葡萄糖面积、血浆葡萄糖面积增加值以及平均血浆葡萄糖反应均大于高GI餐相应反应的90%。在健康受试者中,只有低GI餐后的血浆葡萄糖面积增加值接近预测反应。在健康受试者中,高GI餐比低GI餐产生的胰岛素反应显著更大。我们得出结论,与食物的GI相比,糖尿病食物交换份法能更准确地预测含碳水化合物食物作为混合餐一部分食用后的餐后反应。(摘要截选至250字)