Suppr超能文献

使用白面包血糖指数预测混合餐的相对血糖反应。

Prediction of the relative blood glucose response of mixed meals using the white bread glycemic index.

作者信息

Wolever T M, Nuttall F Q, Lee R, Wong G S, Josse R G, Csima A, Jenkins D J

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 1985 Sep-Oct;8(5):418-28. doi: 10.2337/diacare.8.5.418.

Abstract

Unexpected plasma glucose responses to different mixed meals fed to normal and diabetic volunteers have recently been reported. We have therefore examined in normal volunteers the effect of mixing carbohydrate foods of different glycemic indices (GIs) without the addition of fat and protein. The observed GI of the mixed meal was within 2% of the expected value. In studies in the literature where fat and protein were added to mixed meals, the observed blood glucose responses also related significantly to the meal GIs calculated from the individual foods. Addition of fat and protein in the quantities used did not obscure this relationship. Studies to determine sources of error in comparing glycemic responses showed that type II diabetic patients displayed the least within-individual variation, and type I diabetic patients the most. Expression of results as the GI rather than as absolute glycemic response areas reduced by 50% the between-subject variation. The mean GI values of rice tested in type I and type II patients were similar (82 +/- 22 compared with 74 +/- 19) and the reproducibility 22 mo later in the same group of subjects was excellent (81 +/- 15 compared with 83 +/- 15). However, the lack of precise GI values for all foods fed in the test meals indicates a need for GI values to be derived for a wider range of individual foodstuffs. The GI approach to classifying foods according to physiologic effect may play a useful role in planning meals and diets in which specific blood glucose profiles are required.

摘要

最近有报道称,正常志愿者和糖尿病志愿者对不同混合餐的血浆葡萄糖反应出人意料。因此,我们在正常志愿者中研究了不添加脂肪和蛋白质的情况下,混合不同血糖指数(GI)碳水化合物食物的效果。混合餐的实测GI在预期值的2%以内。在文献中关于向混合餐中添加脂肪和蛋白质的研究中,观察到的血糖反应也与根据单一食物计算出的餐食GI显著相关。按所使用的量添加脂肪和蛋白质并没有掩盖这种关系。确定血糖反应比较中误差来源的研究表明,II型糖尿病患者个体内变异最小,I型糖尿病患者个体内变异最大。将结果表示为GI而不是绝对血糖反应面积,可使受试者间变异减少50%。在I型和II型患者中测试的大米平均GI值相似(分别为82±22和74±19),并且在22个月后同一组受试者中的重现性极佳(分别为81±15和83±15)。然而,测试餐中所提供的所有食物缺乏精确的GI值,这表明需要为更广泛的单一食物确定GI值。根据生理效应分类食物的GI方法在规划需要特定血糖曲线的餐食和饮食方面可能会发挥有益作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验