• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比尔和梅琳达·盖茨如何增加其他人对公共产品资金的捐赠?

How can Bill and Melinda Gates increase other people's donations to fund public goods?

作者信息

Karlan Dean, List John A

机构信息

Northwestern University, Innovations for Poverty Action, Jameel Poverty Action Lab and NBER, United States of America.

University of Chicago and NBER, United States of America.

出版信息

J Public Econ. 2020 Nov;191:104296. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104296. Epub 2020 Oct 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104296
PMID:33052151
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7544478/
Abstract

We conducted a fundraising experiment with an international development nonprofit organization in which a matching grant offered by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation raised more funds than one from an anonymous donor. The effect is strongest for solicitees who previously gave to other BMGF-supported, poverty charities. With supporting evidence from two other fundraising experiments as well as a survey experiment, we argue this is consistent with a quality signal mechanism. Alternative mechanisms are discussed, and not ruled out. The results help inform theories about charitable giving decision-making, and provide guidance to organizations and large donors on how to overcome information asymmetries hindering fundraising.

摘要

我们与一家国际发展非营利组织进行了一项筹款实验,实验中比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会提供的配对赠款比匿名捐赠者提供的赠款筹集到了更多资金。对于之前向其他由比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会支持的扶贫慈善机构捐款的受捐者来说,这种效应最为明显。结合另外两项筹款实验以及一项调查实验的支持证据,我们认为这与质量信号机制相符。我们讨论了其他机制,但并未将其排除。研究结果有助于为慈善捐赠决策理论提供参考,并为组织和大型捐赠者提供指导,帮助他们克服阻碍筹款的信息不对称问题。

相似文献

1
How can Bill and Melinda Gates increase other people's donations to fund public goods?比尔和梅琳达·盖茨如何增加其他人对公共产品资金的捐赠?
J Public Econ. 2020 Nov;191:104296. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104296. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
2
Fundraising, government grants and donations to nonprofit hospital charities.非营利性医院慈善机构的筹款、政府拨款和捐赠。
Health Serv Manage Res. 1995 Aug;8(3):198-208. doi: 10.1177/095148489500800305.
3
When tainted money should fund public goods: fundraising professional and public moral preferences.当脏钱应用于公共物品时:筹款专业人士与公众道德偏好。
PNAS Nexus. 2023 Sep 26;2(9):pgad285. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad285. eCollection 2023 Sep.
4
Following new tax rules on charitable deductions.继慈善捐赠扣除的新税收规定之后。
Healthc Financ Manage. 1994 Nov;48(11):54, 56, 58.
5
The Influence of Proportion Dominance and Global Need Perception on Donations.比例优势和全球需求认知对捐赠的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 2;13:800867. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.800867. eCollection 2022.
6
Misfinancing global health: a case for transparency in disbursements and decision making.全球卫生资金错配:支出与决策透明化的必要性
Lancet. 2008 Sep 27;372(9644):1185-91. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61485-3.
7
Tax economics of charitable giving: pointers for the hospital and donor.慈善捐赠的税收经济学:给医院和捐赠者的建议
Top Health Care Financ. 1980 Winter;7(2):77-89.
8
Behavioral economics. Avoiding overhead aversion in charity.行为经济学。避免慈善中的管理费用厌恶。
Science. 2014 Oct 31;346(6209):632-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1253932.
9
What Determines the Success of Charitable Crowdfunding Campaigns? Evidence from China During the COVID-19 Pandemic.是什么决定了慈善众筹活动的成功?来自中国新冠疫情期间的证据。
Voluntas. 2023 Jan 30:1-15. doi: 10.1007/s11266-023-00557-z.
10
An experimental test of fundraising appeals targeting donor and recipient benefits.针对捐赠者和受赠者利益的筹款呼吁的实验测试。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Oct;5(10):1339-1348. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01095-8. Epub 2021 Apr 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Information and sin goods: Experimental evidence on cigarettes.信息与罪恶商品:香烟的实验证据。
Health Econ. 2021 Feb;30(2):289-310. doi: 10.1002/hec.4189. Epub 2020 Nov 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Impediments to Effective Altruism: The Role of Subjective Preferences in Charitable Giving.有效利他主义的障碍:主观偏好在慈善捐赠中的作用。
Psychol Sci. 2018 May;29(5):834-844. doi: 10.1177/0956797617747648. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
2
Behavioral economics. Avoiding overhead aversion in charity.行为经济学。避免慈善中的管理费用厌恶。
Science. 2014 Oct 31;346(6209):632-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1253932.
3
Compliance without pressure: the foot-in-the-door technique.无压力顺从:登门槛技巧。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1966 Aug;4(2):195-202. doi: 10.1037/h0023552.