Phillips R S, Hanff P A, Kauffman R S, Aronson M D
J Infect Dis. 1987 Oct;156(4):575-81. doi: 10.1093/infdis/156.4.575.
We determined the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of a direct fluorescence test for Chlamydia trachomatis infection compared with culture of the endocervix in women seeking routine gynecologic care. Of 527 patients seen in a hospital-based practice, 23 (4.4%) had a positive culture for C. trachomatis. The overall sensitivity of the direct test was 70%, and the specificity was 98%. When five or more endocervical cells were present on the direct test slide, the sensitivity increased to 92%, and the specificity decreased to 96% (P less than .05). When the presence of any columnar epithelial cells, five or more elementary bodies, or both was used as the criteria for accepting specimens, the sensitivity and specificity of the direct test were 80% and 96%, respectively. However, 44% of the specimens would be rejected if these criteria were used. The overall probability that an individual with a positive direct test would have a positive culture was 62%.
我们比较了直接荧光试验与宫颈内膜培养法对寻求常规妇科护理的女性沙眼衣原体感染的敏感性、特异性和预测价值。在一家医院门诊就诊的527例患者中,23例(4.4%)沙眼衣原体培养呈阳性。直接试验的总体敏感性为70%,特异性为98%。当直接试验载玻片上有五个或更多宫颈内膜细胞时,敏感性增至92%,特异性降至96%(P小于0.05)。当以存在任何柱状上皮细胞、五个或更多原体或两者同时存在作为接受标本的标准时,直接试验的敏感性和特异性分别为80%和96%。然而,如果采用这些标准,44%的标本将被拒收。直接试验呈阳性的个体培养呈阳性的总体概率为62%。