Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Fellowship Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Program, Womack Army Medical Center, Fort Bragg, NC 28303, USA.
Hum Reprod. 2020 Nov 1;35(11):2548-2555. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa219.
Do donor oocyte recipients benefit from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A)?
PGT-A did not improve the likelihood of live birth for recipients of vitrified donor oocytes, but it did avoid embryo transfer in cycles with no euploid embryos.
Relative to slow freeze, oocyte vitrification has led to increased live birth from cryopreserved oocytes and has led to widespread use of this technology in donor egg IVF programs. However, oocyte cryopreservation has the potential to disrupt the meiotic spindle leading to abnormal segregation of chromosome during meiosis II and ultimately increased aneuploidy in resultant embryos. Therefore, PGT-A might have benefits in vitrified donor egg cycles. In contrast, embryos derived from young donor oocytes are expected to be predominantly euploid, and trophectoderm biopsy may have a negative effect relative to transfer without biopsy.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is a paired cohort study analyzing donor oocyte-recipient cycles with or without PGT-A performed from 2012 to 2018 at 47 US IVF centers.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Vitrified donor oocyte cycles were analyzed for live birth as the main outcome measure. Outcomes from donors whose oocytes were used by at least two separate recipient couples, one couple using PGT-A (study group) and one using embryos without PGT-A (control group), were compared. Generalized estimating equation models controlled for confounders and nested for individual donors contributing to both PGT-A and non-PGT-A cohorts, enabling a single donor to serve as her own control.
In total, 1291 initiated recipient cycles from 223 donors were analyzed, including 262 cycles with and 1029 without PGT-A. The median aneuploidy rate per recipient was 25%. Forty-three percent of PGT-A cycles had only euploid embryos, whereas only 12.7% of cycles had no euploid embryos. On average 1.09 embryos were transferred in the PGT-A group compared to 1.38 in the group without PGT-A (P < 0.01). Live birth occurred in 53.8% of cycles with PGT-A versus 55.8% without PGT-A (P = 0.44). Similar findings persisted in cumulative live birth from per recipient cycle.
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Pooled clinical data from 47 IVF clinics introduced PGT-A heterogeneity as genetic testing were performed using different embryology laboratories, PGT-A companies and testing platforms.
PGT-A testing in donor oocyte-recipient cycles does not improve the chance for live birth nor decrease the risk for miscarriage in the first transfer cycle but does increase cost and time for the patient. Further studies are required to test if our findings can be applied to the young infertility patient population using autologous oocytes.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No external funding was used for this study. There are no conflicts of interest to declare.
N/A.
供体卵母细胞受者是否从非整倍体(PGT-A)的胚胎植入前遗传学检测中受益?
PGT-A 并没有提高玻璃化供体卵母细胞受者的活产率,但它确实避免了没有整倍体胚胎的周期中的胚胎移植。
与慢速冷冻相比,卵母细胞玻璃化导致冷冻保存卵母细胞的活产率增加,并导致这种技术在供体卵 IVF 计划中广泛使用。然而,卵母细胞冷冻保存有可能破坏减数分裂纺锤体,导致减数分裂 II 期间染色体异常分离,最终导致胚胎中出现非整倍体增加。因此,PGT-A 在玻璃化的供体卵周期中可能具有益处。相比之下,来自年轻供体卵母细胞的胚胎预计主要是整倍体,并且滋养外胚层活检可能相对于没有活检的转移具有负面影响。
研究设计、规模、持续时间:这是一项配对队列研究,分析了 2012 年至 2018 年在美国 47 个 IVF 中心进行的 223 对供体卵母细胞受者周期,有无 PGT-A。
参与者/材料、地点、方法:以活产为主要结局指标分析玻璃化供体卵母细胞周期。比较了至少有两名不同受者夫妇使用的供体卵的结局,一对夫妇使用 PGT-A(研究组),一对夫妇使用未经 PGT-A 的胚胎(对照组)。使用广义估计方程模型控制混杂因素,并嵌套为对每个贡献者的供者进行分组,使单个供者可以作为自己的对照。
总共分析了 223 名供体的 1291 个启动受者周期,包括 262 个有和 1029 个没有 PGT-A 的周期。每个受者的平均非整倍体率为 25%。43%的 PGT-A 周期只有整倍体胚胎,而只有 12.7%的周期没有整倍体胚胎。PGT-A 组平均转移 1.09 个胚胎,而无 PGT-A 组转移 1.38 个胚胎(P < 0.01)。PGT-A 组的活产率为 53.8%,无 PGT-A 组为 55.8%(P = 0.44)。从每个受者周期的累积活产来看,也存在类似的发现。
局限性、谨慎的原因:来自 47 个 IVF 诊所的汇总临床数据引入了 PGT-A 异质性,因为基因检测是使用不同的胚胎学实验室、PGT-A 公司和检测平台进行的。
PGT-A 检测在供体卵母细胞受者周期中并不能提高活产率,也不能降低首次移植周期的流产风险,但确实增加了患者的成本和时间。需要进一步的研究来测试我们的发现是否可以应用于使用自体卵母细胞的年轻不孕患者群体。
研究资金/利益冲突:本研究无外部资金支持。没有利益冲突需要声明。
无。