• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The evolving landscape of donor egg treatment: success, women's choice, and anonymity.供卵治疗的发展现状:成功率、女性选择和匿名性。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 Sep;38(9):2327-2332. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02262-6. Epub 2021 Jun 20.
2
Preimplantation genetic testing and chances of a healthy live birth amongst recipients of fresh donor oocytes in the United States.美国新鲜供体卵受者中,胚胎植入前遗传学检测与健康活产几率。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020 Sep;37(9):2283-2292. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01874-8. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
3
Live birth and perinatal outcomes using cryopreserved oocytes: an analysis of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority database from 2000 to 2016 using three clinical models.使用冷冻卵子的活产和围产期结局:2000 年至 2016 年人类受精和胚胎管理局数据库的三种临床模型分析。
Hum Reprod. 2021 Apr 20;36(5):1416-1426. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa343.
4
Association of Fresh Embryo Transfers Compared With Cryopreserved-Thawed Embryo Transfers With Live Birth Rate Among Women Undergoing Assisted Reproduction Using Freshly Retrieved Donor Oocytes.新鲜胚胎移植与使用新鲜募集供体卵进行辅助生殖的女性中冷冻-解冻胚胎移植与活产率的关系。
JAMA. 2021 Jan 12;325(2):156-163. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.23718.
5
Endometrial preparation for women undergoing embryo transfer with frozen embryos or embryos derived from donor oocytes.为接受冷冻胚胎或供体卵母细胞来源胚胎移植的女性进行子宫内膜准备。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 28;10(10):CD006359. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006359.pub3.
6
Cumulative live birth rates after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen-thaw cycles in 1050 women: secondary outcome of an RCT comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols.1050名女性在一个辅助生殖技术周期(包括所有后续冻融周期)后的累积活产率:一项比较促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂和促性腺激素释放激素激动剂方案的随机对照试验的次要结果。
Hum Reprod. 2017 Mar 1;32(3):556-567. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew358.
7
To test or not to test? A framework for counselling patients on preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A).是否进行检测?胚胎植入前遗传学检测非整倍体(PGT-A)咨询的框架。
Hum Reprod. 2019 Feb 1;34(2):268-275. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey346.
8
Factors affecting live birth rates in donor oocytes from commercial egg banks vs. program egg donors: an analysis of 40,485 cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry in 2016-2018.影响商业卵子库供卵者与项目供卵者活产率的因素:2016-2018 年美国生殖医学学会注册登记系统 40485 个周期分析。
Fertil Steril. 2022 Feb;117(2):339-348. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.10.006. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
9
Planned oocyte cryopreservation-10-15-year follow-up: return rates and cycle outcomes.计划卵母细胞冷冻保存 - 10-15 年随访:回院率和周期结局。
Fertil Steril. 2021 Jun;115(6):1511-1520. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.01.011. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
10
Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies does not increase success rates in fresh oocyte donation cycles: a paired cohort study.胚胎植入前遗传学检测非整倍体不能提高新鲜卵母细胞捐赠周期的成功率:一项配对队列研究。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 Nov;38(11):2909-2914. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02339-2. Epub 2021 Oct 5.

引用本文的文献

1
FIGO position statement: Gamete donations.国际妇产科联盟立场声明:配子捐赠
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Jul;170(1):15-24. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.70200. Epub 2025 May 15.
2
Pregnancies through oocyte donation. A mini review of pathways involved in placental dysfunction.通过卵母细胞捐赠的妊娠。胎盘功能障碍相关途径的简要综述。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jan 17;11:1338516. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1338516. eCollection 2024.
3
Does paternal age affect the live birth rate in donor oocyte cycles? A systematic review and meta-analysis.父亲年龄会影响供卵周期的活产率吗?系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Mar;40(3):617-626. doi: 10.1007/s10815-023-02714-1. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
4
Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies does not increase success rates in fresh oocyte donation cycles: a paired cohort study.胚胎植入前遗传学检测非整倍体不能提高新鲜卵母细胞捐赠周期的成功率:一项配对队列研究。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 Nov;38(11):2909-2914. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02339-2. Epub 2021 Oct 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Is increasing paternal age negatively associated with donor oocyte recipient success? A paired analysis using sibling oocytes.父亲年龄增加是否与供卵受者的妊娠结局呈负相关?一项利用同胞供卵的配对分析。
Fertil Steril. 2021 Aug;116(2):373-379. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.03.037. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
2
Association of Fresh Embryo Transfers Compared With Cryopreserved-Thawed Embryo Transfers With Live Birth Rate Among Women Undergoing Assisted Reproduction Using Freshly Retrieved Donor Oocytes.新鲜胚胎移植与使用新鲜募集供体卵进行辅助生殖的女性中冷冻-解冻胚胎移植与活产率的关系。
JAMA. 2021 Jan 12;325(2):156-163. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.23718.
3
Donor oocyte recipients do not benefit from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy to improve pregnancy outcomes.供卵受者并未从胚胎植入前遗传学检测非整倍体中获益,以改善妊娠结局。
Hum Reprod. 2020 Nov 1;35(11):2548-2555. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa219.
4
Pregnancy outcomes following oocyte donation.捐卵后的妊娠结局。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Jan;70:81-91. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.07.008. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
5
Preimplantation genetic testing and chances of a healthy live birth amongst recipients of fresh donor oocytes in the United States.美国新鲜供体卵受者中,胚胎植入前遗传学检测与健康活产几率。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020 Sep;37(9):2283-2292. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01874-8. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
6
Repetitive oocyte donation: a committee opinion.重复捐卵:委员会意见。
Fertil Steril. 2020 Jun;113(6):1150-1153. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.03.030.
7
Fertility care in the era of commercial direct-to-consumer home DNA kits: issues to ponder.商业化直接面向消费者的家用 DNA 检测试剂盒时代的生育保健:值得思考的问题。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020 Mar;37(3):689-692. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01711-y. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
8
Experiences and psychological outcomes of the oocyte donor: a survey of donors post-donation from one center.捐卵者的经验和心理结果:来自一个中心的捐卵后调查。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Oct;36(10):1999-2005. doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01527-5. Epub 2019 Jul 13.
9
Frozen versus fresh single blastocyst transfer in ovulatory women: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.促排卵周期中冻融与新鲜单个囊胚移植的多中心随机对照研究
Lancet. 2019 Mar 30;393(10178):1310-1318. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32843-5. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
10
A Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Donor Egg Single Embryo Transfers With and Without Preimplantation Genetic Testing.供卵单胚胎移植患者中进行与未进行胚胎植入前遗传学检测的妊娠结局比较。
Reprod Sci. 2019 Dec;26(12):1661-1665. doi: 10.1177/1933719118820474. Epub 2018 Dec 20.

供卵治疗的发展现状:成功率、女性选择和匿名性。

The evolving landscape of donor egg treatment: success, women's choice, and anonymity.

机构信息

Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Fertility, New York, NY, 10065, USA.

出版信息

J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 Sep;38(9):2327-2332. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02262-6. Epub 2021 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1007/s10815-021-02262-6
PMID:34148151
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8490562/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To analyze donor oocyte (DE) data across 6 years for oocyte usage efficiency, trends, and whether changes impacted outcomes.

METHODS

From 2014 to 2019, 323 DE embryo transfers were completed in 200 recipients using oocytes derived of 163 donors. We assessed data for oocytes being freshly retrieved (FRESH-EGG) vs. purchased frozen (FROZEN-EGG); embryos transferred fresh (FRESH-ET) vs. frozen (FROZEN-ET); cycles SHARED (two recipients) vs. SOLE (one recipient); single (SET) vs. double (DET) embryo transfers and usage of PGT-A. Primary outcome was ongoing pregnancy plus live birth (OP/LB) rate.

RESULTS

A total of 229 FRESH-EGG (70%) and 94 FROZEN-EGG (30%) cycles were completed. Overall, the use of FRESH-EGG yielded a higher OP/LB compared to FROZEN-EGG (49% vs. 30%, p = 0.001); within the FRESH-EGG group, OP/LB was similar when comparing FRESH-ET vs. FROZEN-ET (58% vs. 45%, p = 0.07). Within the FRESH-ET group, those using FRESH-EGG had a higher OP/LB than those using FROZEN-EGG (58% vs. 27%, p < 0.001). SHARED vs. SOLE cycles (p = 0.6), donor age (21-32 years; p = 0.4), and age of intended parents (maternal p = 0.3, paternal p = 0.2) did not significantly impact OP/LB. Notably, the use of PGT-A did not improve odds for an OP/LB (p = 0.7).

CONCLUSION

The use of FRESH-EGG with FRESH-ET without PGT-A remains superior to newer DE treatment combinations. Specifically, the use of FROZEN-EGG and PGT-A did not improve outcomes. Although changing DE practices may enhance experience and affordability, patients and providers must appreciate that choices do not always favorably impact success. Additionally, newly available genetic-ancestry testing may pose longer-term ramifications mandating change in treatment and/or counseling.

摘要

目的

分析 6 年来供体卵母细胞(DE)数据,评估卵母细胞使用效率、趋势以及这些变化是否对结局产生影响。

方法

2014 年至 2019 年,在 200 名接受治疗的患者中完成了 323 例 DE 胚胎移植,这些患者使用了 163 名供体获得的卵母细胞。我们评估了新鲜取出卵母细胞(FRESH-EGG)与冷冻购买卵母细胞(FROZEN-EGG)、新鲜胚胎移植(FRESH-ET)与冷冻胚胎移植(FROZEN-ET)、双受体(SHARED)与单受体(SOLE)、单胚胎移植(SET)与双胚胎移植(DET)以及 PGT-A 使用的数据。主要结局为持续妊娠加活产率(ongoing pregnancy plus live birth,OP/LB)。

结果

共完成 229 例 FRESH-EGG(70%)和 94 例 FROZEN-EGG(30%)周期。总体而言,与 FROZEN-EGG 相比,FRESH-EGG 获得的 OP/LB 更高(49% vs. 30%,p=0.001);在 FRESH-EGG 组中,FRESH-ET 与 FROZEN-ET 之间的 OP/LB 相似(58% vs. 45%,p=0.07)。在 FRESH-ET 组中,使用 FRESH-EGG 的患者 OP/LB 高于使用 FROZEN-EGG 的患者(58% vs. 27%,p<0.001)。SHARED 与 SOLE 周期(p=0.6)、供体年龄(21-32 岁;p=0.4)和预期父母年龄(母亲 p=0.3,父亲 p=0.2)对 OP/LB 没有显著影响。值得注意的是,PGT-A 的使用并不能提高 OP/LB 的几率(p=0.7)。

结论

使用 FRESH-EGG 联合 FRESH-ET 且不进行 PGT-A 仍然优于新的 DE 治疗组合。具体而言,使用 FROZEN-EGG 和 PGT-A 并不能改善结局。尽管改变 DE 实践可能会增强经验和可负担性,但患者和提供者必须认识到,选择并不总是有利于成功。此外,新出现的遗传谱系检测可能会带来更长期的后果,需要改变治疗和/或咨询。