Department of Cardiology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, Australia.
ANZAC Research Institute, NSW, Australia; Westmead Applied Research Centre, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Jan 1;138:11-19. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.09.059. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
We assessed the association of BMI with all-cause and cardiovascular (CV) mortality in a contemporary acute coronary syndrome cohort. Patients from the Australian Cooperative National Registry of Acute Coronary Care, Guideline Adherence and Clinical Events and Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events between 2009 and 2019, were divided into BMI subgroups (underweight: <18.5, healthy: 18.5 to 24.9, overweight: 25 to 29.9, obese: 30 to 39.9, extremely obese: >40). Logistic regression was used to determine the association between BMI group and outcomes of all cause and CV death in hospital, and at 6 months. 8,503 patients were identified, mean age 64 ± 13, 72% male. The BMI breakdown was: underweight- 95, healthy- 2,140, overweight- 3,258, obese- 2,653, extremely obese- 357. Obese patients were younger (66 ± 12 vs 67 ± 13), with more hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia vs healthy (all p < 0.05). Obese had lower hospital mortality than healthy: all-cause: 1% versus 4%, aOR (95% CI): 0.49(0.27, 0.87); CV: 1% versus 3%, 0.51(0.27, 0.96). At 6-month underweight had higher mortality than healthy: all-cause: 11% versus 4%, 2.69(1.26, 5.76); CV: 7% versus 1%, 3.54(1.19, 10.54); whereas obese had lower mortality: all-cause: 1% versus 4%, 0.48(0.29, 0.77); CV: 0.4% versus 1%, 0.42(0.19, 0.93). When BMI was plotted as a continuous variable against outcome a U-shaped relationship was demonstrated, with highest event rates in the most obese (>60). In conclusion, BMI is associated with mortality following an acute coronary syndrome. Obese patients had the best outcomes, suggesting persistence of the obesity paradox. However, there was a threshold effect, and favorable outcomes did not extend to the most obese.
我们评估了 BMI 与当代急性冠状动脉综合征患者全因和心血管(CV)死亡率的相关性。2009 年至 2019 年期间,来自澳大利亚合作国家急性冠状动脉护理登记处、指南依从性和临床事件登记处和全球急性冠状动脉事件登记处的患者被分为 BMI 亚组(体重不足:<18.5、健康:18.5 至 24.9、超重:25 至 29.9、肥胖:30 至 39.9、极度肥胖:>40)。使用逻辑回归来确定 BMI 组与住院和 6 个月时全因和 CV 死亡的相关性。确定了 8503 名患者,平均年龄 64±13 岁,72%为男性。BMI 分布如下:体重不足-95、健康-2140、超重-3258、肥胖-2653、极度肥胖-357。肥胖患者年龄较轻(66±12 岁比 67±13 岁),高血压、糖尿病和血脂异常的比例高于健康组(均<0.05)。肥胖患者的住院死亡率低于健康组:全因:1%比 4%,优势比(95%CI):0.49(0.27,0.87);心血管:1%比 3%,0.51(0.27,0.96)。6 个月时,体重不足患者的死亡率高于健康组:全因:11%比 4%,2.69(1.26,5.76);心血管:7%比 1%,3.54(1.19,10.54);而肥胖患者的死亡率较低:全因:1%比 4%,0.48(0.29,0.77);心血管:0.4%比 1%,0.42(0.19,0.93)。当 BMI 作为连续变量与结果进行绘制时,呈 U 形关系,最肥胖的患者(>60)事件发生率最高。总之,BMI 与急性冠状动脉综合征后的死亡率相关。肥胖患者的预后最好,表明肥胖悖论仍然存在。然而,存在一个阈值效应,有利的结果并没有扩展到最肥胖的患者。