University of Southern California, School of Pharmacy, Department of Regulatory and Quality Sciences, CA 90089, USA.
Vaccine. 2020 Nov 3;38(47):7485-7489. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.09.067. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
With the ongoing globalization of the pharmaceutical industry, efforts to harmonize technical requirements of registering drugs and biologics, including vaccines, have produced a number of useful guidelines utilized around the world. However, such efforts have not been extended to the regulatory review process or product labeling. Prescribing information and patient information leaflet are two types of such product labeling documents. This study examined the differences in the languages of these documents between the United States (US) and European Union (EU). The key documents examined were the U.S. Food & Drug Administration's (FDA) Package Inserts (PIs), U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Vaccine Information Statements (VISs), and the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPCs) and Package Leaflets (PLs). Prescribing information and patient information leaflet languages were subsequently organized into ten and seven categories, respectively. Comparison of FDA PIs to EMA SmPCs showed little harmonization between the two regions, and CDC VISs to EMA PLs revealed even less.
随着制药行业的不断全球化,为使药品和生物制剂(包括疫苗)的注册技术要求协调一致,人们做出了诸多努力,产生了许多在全球范围内使用的有用指南。然而,这些努力并未扩展到监管审查程序或产品标签。说明书和患者信息传单是此类产品标签文件的两种类型。本研究考察了美国(US)和欧盟(EU)之间这些文件在语言上的差异。研究中检查的主要文件是美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的包装插页(PI)、美国疾病预防控制中心(CDC)的疫苗信息声明(VIS),以及欧洲药品管理局(EMA)的产品特性摘要(SmPC)和包装说明书(PL)。随后,将说明书和患者信息传单语言分别归入十个和七个类别。将 FDA PIs 与 EMA SmPCs 进行比较表明,这两个地区之间几乎没有协调一致,而将 CDC VISs 与 EMA PLs 进行比较则显示出更少的一致性。