• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲利益相关者关于生物类似药的学习经验:第二部分——改善生物类似药在临床实践中的应用。

European Stakeholder Learnings Regarding Biosimilars: Part II-Improving Biosimilar Use in Clinical Practice.

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BioDrugs. 2020 Dec;34(6):797-808. doi: 10.1007/s40259-020-00440-z.

DOI:10.1007/s40259-020-00440-z
PMID:33063267
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7669768/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the benefits biosimilars offer in terms of cost savings and patient access, healthcare professionals and patients have been reluctant to use them. Next to insufficient understanding of and trust in biosimilars, healthcare professionals and patients have questions about switching and the nocebo effect when using biosimilars in clinical practice. In addition, clear motivation to use biosimilars may be lacking among these stakeholders.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to provide recommendations on how to improve biosimilar use on both a clinical and a practical level based on insights from healthcare professionals (physicians, hospital pharmacists, nurses), patients (or their representatives), and regulators across Europe.

METHODS

We conducted 44 semi-structured interviews with experts from five stakeholder groups across Europe: physicians, hospital pharmacists, nurses, regulators, and patients/representatives. Interviews were transcribed ad verbatim and transcripts analysed according to the thematic framework method.

RESULTS

Based on the insights and considerations of the experts interviewed, we identified a number of recommendations to improve the use of biosimilars in clinical practice. Regarding switch implementation, the experts voiced support for the following actions: (1) disseminate evidence from and experience with (multiple) switching; (2) provide clear, one-voice regulatory guidance about the interchangeability of biosimilars and their reference product; (3) apply a multi-stakeholder implementation and communication protocol to guide switching in clinical practice; (4) apply a pragmatic approach when taking switch decisions; and (5) avoid mandated switching, allowing stakeholder communication and alignment. When discussing approaches to increase the willingness of stakeholders to use biosimilars, we concluded that actions should be centred on (1) communicating the benefits provided by biosimilars and the introduction of market competition, (2) increasing awareness among stakeholders about medicine prices and their societal responsibility to use medicines in a cost-effective manner, (3) transparent reporting about the allocation of savings, (4) sharing biosimilar usage data among hospitals and prescribers to allow peer-to-peer benchmarking, and (5) applying a balanced combination of tangible and non-tangible incentives that can be tailored to offset the time and effort expended by stakeholders when switching to a biosimilar.

CONCLUSIONS

This study proposes a number of strategic, practical, and overarching recommendations to support healthcare professionals and inform decision makers to improve the clinical use of biosimilars and the willingness of stakeholders to use them. The proposed solutions to fully realise the potential of biosimilars for healthcare systems and patients include developing practical switch guidance, being transparent about the gains from biosimilar use (and how savings are allocated), and developing a combination of non-tangible and tangible incentives for involved stakeholders.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff3f/7669768/d88c79ea8ad2/40259_2020_440_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff3f/7669768/7e365c0259aa/40259_2020_440_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff3f/7669768/51b70bc86a2f/40259_2020_440_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff3f/7669768/faf1f6dda933/40259_2020_440_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff3f/7669768/dc3876482603/40259_2020_440_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff3f/7669768/d88c79ea8ad2/40259_2020_440_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff3f/7669768/7e365c0259aa/40259_2020_440_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff3f/7669768/51b70bc86a2f/40259_2020_440_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff3f/7669768/faf1f6dda933/40259_2020_440_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff3f/7669768/dc3876482603/40259_2020_440_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff3f/7669768/d88c79ea8ad2/40259_2020_440_Fig5_HTML.jpg
摘要

背景

尽管生物类似药在节省成本和增加患者可及性方面具有优势,但医疗保健专业人员和患者仍不愿使用生物类似药。除了对生物类似药的理解和信任不足外,医疗保健专业人员和患者还对在临床实践中使用生物类似药时的转换和反安慰剂效应存在疑问。此外,这些利益相关者可能缺乏使用生物类似药的明确动机。

目的

本研究旨在根据来自欧洲各地的医疗保健专业人员(医生、医院药剂师、护士)、患者(或其代表)和监管机构的见解,就如何在临床和实践层面上提高生物类似药的使用提供建议。

方法

我们对来自欧洲五个利益相关者群体的专家进行了 44 次半结构化访谈:医生、医院药剂师、护士、监管机构和患者/代表。访谈内容逐字记录,并根据主题框架方法进行分析。

结果

根据接受采访的专家的意见和考虑,我们确定了一些建议,以改善生物类似药在临床实践中的使用。关于实施转换,专家们表示支持以下行动:(1)传播来自(多次)转换的证据和经验;(2)提供关于生物类似药及其参照产品可互换性的明确、一致的监管指导;(3)应用多利益相关者实施和沟通协议来指导临床实践中的转换;(4)在做出转换决策时采取务实的方法;(5)避免强制转换,允许利益相关者进行沟通和协调。在讨论提高利益相关者使用生物类似药意愿的方法时,我们得出的结论是,行动应集中于:(1)沟通生物类似药提供的益处和引入市场竞争;(2)提高利益相关者对药品价格及其以具有成本效益的方式使用药品的社会责任感的认识;(3)透明报告节省的分配情况;(4)在医院和处方医生之间共享生物类似药使用数据,以允许同行基准测试;(5)应用有形和无形激励措施的平衡组合,可以针对利益相关者在转换为生物类似药时所花费的时间和精力进行调整。

结论

本研究提出了一些战略、实践和总体建议,以支持医疗保健专业人员并为决策者提供信息,以改善生物类似药的临床使用和利益相关者使用它们的意愿。为了充分发挥生物类似药对医疗保健系统和患者的潜力,提出的解决方案包括制定实用的转换指南、对生物类似药使用的收益(以及如何分配节省的费用)保持透明,并为相关利益相关者制定有形和无形激励措施的组合。

相似文献

1
European Stakeholder Learnings Regarding Biosimilars: Part II-Improving Biosimilar Use in Clinical Practice.欧洲利益相关者关于生物类似药的学习经验:第二部分——改善生物类似药在临床实践中的应用。
BioDrugs. 2020 Dec;34(6):797-808. doi: 10.1007/s40259-020-00440-z.
2
European Stakeholder Learnings Regarding Biosimilars: Part I-Improving Biosimilar Understanding and Adoption.欧洲利益相关方对生物类似药的认识:第一部分——提高对生物类似药的理解和采用。
BioDrugs. 2020 Dec;34(6):783-796. doi: 10.1007/s40259-020-00452-9.
3
Biosimilar Use and Switching in Belgium: Avenues for Integrated Policymaking.比利时生物类似药的使用与转换:综合政策制定途径
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jul 12;13:821616. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.821616. eCollection 2022.
4
Regulatory Information and Guidance on Biosimilars and Their Use Across Europe: A Call for Strengthened One Voice Messaging.欧洲生物类似药的监管信息与指南及其应用:呼吁强化统一发声
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Mar 9;9:820755. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.820755. eCollection 2022.
5
Off-Patent Biologicals and Biosimilars Tendering in Europe-A Proposal towards More Sustainable Practices.欧洲非专利生物制品和生物类似药招标——迈向更可持续做法的建议
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021 May 24;14(6):499. doi: 10.3390/ph14060499.
6
Biosimilars in Belgium: a proposal for a more competitive market.比利时的生物类似药:一个更具竞争力的市场的提案。
Acta Clin Belg. 2021 Dec;76(6):441-452. doi: 10.1080/17843286.2020.1761690. Epub 2020 May 13.
7
Leveraging the holistic benefits of biosimilars in Europe - part 2: how payers can safeguard the future of a healthy biosimilar market environment.利用生物类似药在欧洲的整体效益-第 2 部分:支付方如何保障健康的生物类似药市场环境的未来。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2024 Apr;24(4):509-519. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2024.2310684. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
8
The growing role of biologics and biosimilars in the United States: Perspectives from the APhA Biologics and Biosimilars Stakeholder Conference.生物制品和生物类似药在美国日益重要的作用:来自美国药师协会生物制品和生物类似药利益相关者会议的观点
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2017 Sep-Oct;57(5):e15-e27. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2017.05.014. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
9
Provider and patient knowledge gaps on biosimilars: insights from surveys.生物类似药的提供者和患者知识差距:调查结果。
Am J Manag Care. 2022 Nov;28(12 Suppl):S227-S233. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2022.89297.
10
Policies for biosimilar uptake in Europe: An overview.欧洲生物类似药采用政策概述
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 28;12(12):e0190147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190147. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Individual Prescribing Incentives for Biosimilars in Selected European Countries and the USA: a Scoping Literature Review.欧洲部分国家和美国生物类似药的个体处方激励措施:一项范围界定文献综述
BioDrugs. 2025 Sep;39(5):777-791. doi: 10.1007/s40259-025-00736-y. Epub 2025 Aug 1.
2
Untangling the Biosimilars Interchangeability Puzzle: A Provocative Dive into Concepts and Terminology, and Developing a Strategy to Minimize Uncertainties from Interchangeability.解开生物类似药可互换性谜团:深入探讨概念与术语,并制定策略以减少可互换性带来的不确定性
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2025 Apr 24. doi: 10.1007/s43441-025-00765-3.
3
The Path to Accessible Care: Development and Impact of Eculizumab Biosimilars for Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria and Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome.

本文引用的文献

1
European Stakeholder Learnings Regarding Biosimilars: Part I-Improving Biosimilar Understanding and Adoption.欧洲利益相关方对生物类似药的认识:第一部分——提高对生物类似药的理解和采用。
BioDrugs. 2020 Dec;34(6):783-796. doi: 10.1007/s40259-020-00452-9.
2
The Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of Switching Between Reference Biopharmaceuticals and Biosimilars: A Systematic Review.参考生物制品与生物类似药之间转换的疗效、安全性和免疫原性:系统评价。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Oct;108(4):734-755. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1836. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
3
The SPOSIB SB2 Sicilian Cohort: Safety and Effectiveness of Infliximab Biosimilar SB2 in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Including Multiple Switches.
通往可及治疗之路:依库珠单抗生物类似药用于阵发性夜间血红蛋白尿和非典型溶血尿毒综合征的研发与影响
BioDrugs. 2025 Mar;39(2):281-295. doi: 10.1007/s40259-025-00707-3. Epub 2025 Feb 21.
4
Efforts of the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency of Japanese regulatory agency in supporting biosimilar development and disseminate information.日本监管机构药品和医疗器械局在支持生物类似药研发及传播信息方面所做的努力。
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2025 Feb 14. doi: 10.1007/s00210-025-03874-w.
5
An Educational Digital Tool to Improve the Implementation of Switching to a Biosimilar (Rapid Switch Trainer): Tool Development and Validation Study.一种用于改善生物类似药转换实施的教育数字工具(快速转换培训师):工具开发与验证研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Nov 21;8:e56553. doi: 10.2196/56553.
6
Mitigating the Nocebo Effect in Biosimilar Use and Switching: A Systematic Review.减轻生物类似药使用和换药中的反安慰剂效应:一项系统评价
Pharmaceut Med. 2024 Nov;38(6):429-455. doi: 10.1007/s40290-024-00541-y. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
7
Barriers and Enablers Affecting the Uptake of Biosimilar Medicines Viewed Through the Lens of Actor Network Theory: A Systematic Review.通过 Actor Network 理论视角观察影响生物类似药采用的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
BioDrugs. 2024 Jul;38(4):541-555. doi: 10.1007/s40259-024-00659-0. Epub 2024 Jun 15.
8
Charting the Etanercept Journey: Tracing Cost Dynamics in Poland's Off-Patent Market from Reference Drug Rivalry to Biosimilar Monopoly.绘制依那西普的历程:从专利过期市场的参比药物竞争到生物类似药垄断,追踪波兰的成本动态。
BioDrugs. 2024 Jul;38(4):557-569. doi: 10.1007/s40259-024-00663-4. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
9
Can Endangered Biosimilar Markets be Rescued? The Need to Bridge Competing Interests for Long-Term Gain.濒危生物类似药市场能否起死回生?需要兼顾各方利益,谋求长远发展。
BioDrugs. 2024 May;38(3):325-329. doi: 10.1007/s40259-024-00652-7. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
10
Knowledge and attitudes of German and Swiss community pharmacists towards biologicals and biosimilars - a prospective survey before and after the COVID-19 pandemic.德瑞社区药剂师对生物制剂和生物类似药的认知和态度 - 新冠疫情前后的前瞻性调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec 18;23(1):1432. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10475-x.
SPOSIB SB2西西里队列研究:英夫利昔单抗生物类似药SB2在炎症性肠病中的安全性和有效性,包括多次换药情况
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2021 Jan 19;27(2):182-189. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izaa036.
4
Tendering and biosimilars: what role for value-added services?招标与生物类似药:增值服务扮演何种角色?
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2019 Dec 22;8(1):1705120. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2019.1705120. eCollection 2020.
5
The Clinical Implications of Nocebo Effects for Biosimilar Therapy.无安慰剂效应在生物类似药治疗中的临床意义。
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Nov 29;10:1372. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01372. eCollection 2019.
6
Identifying Key Benefits in European Off-Patent Biologics and Biosimilar Markets: It is Not Only About Price!识别欧洲非专利生物制品和生物类似药市场的关键优势:不仅仅是价格!
BioDrugs. 2020 Apr;34(2):159-170. doi: 10.1007/s40259-019-00395-w.
7
Implementing and delivering a successful biosimilar switch programme - the Berkshire West experience.实施并交付一个成功的生物类似药转换计划——伯克希尔西部的经验。
Future Healthc J. 2019 Jun;6(2):143-145. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.6-2-143.
8
Evaluation of Physicians' Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Biosimilars in Russia and Issues Associated with Their Prescribing.评价俄罗斯医生对生物类似药的知识和态度,以及与处方相关的问题。
Biomolecules. 2019 Feb 11;9(2):57. doi: 10.3390/biom9020057.
9
Non-pharmacological Effects in Switching Medication: The Nocebo Effect in Switching from Originator to Biosimilar Agent.转换药物时的非药物效应:从原创药到生物类似药转换时的反安慰剂效应。
BioDrugs. 2018 Oct;32(5):397-404. doi: 10.1007/s40259-018-0306-1.
10
Switching Reference Medicines to Biosimilars: A Systematic Literature Review of Clinical Outcomes.《参照药品转换为生物类似药:临床结局的系统文献回顾》。
Drugs. 2018 Mar;78(4):463-478. doi: 10.1007/s40265-018-0881-y.