Unit of PharmacoTherapy, Epidemiology and Economics, Groningen Research Institute Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Department of Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Eur J Health Econ. 2021 Feb;22(1):75-88. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01236-2. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
The prevalence of diagnosed chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection among pregnant women in the Netherlands is 0.26%, yet many cases remain undiagnosed. HCV screening and treatment of pregnant HCV carriers could reduce the burden of disease and limit vertical transmission from mother to child. We assessed the impact of HCV screening and subsequent treatment with new direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) among pregnant women in the Netherlands.
An HCV natural history Markov transition state model was developed, to evaluate the public-health and economic impact of HCV screening and treatment. Besides all 179,000 pregnant women in the Netherlands (cohort 1), we modelled 3 further cohorts: all 79,000 first-time pregnant women (cohort 2), 33,000 pregnant migrant women (cohort 3) and 16,000 first-time pregnant migrant women (cohort 4). Each cohort was analyzed in various scenarios: i no intervention, i.e., the current practice, ii screen-and-treat, i.e., the most extensive approach involving treatment of all individuals found HCV-positive, and iii screen-and-treat/monitor, i.e., a strategy involving treatment of symptomatic (F1-F4) patients and follow-up of asymptomatic (F0) HCV carriers with subsequent treatment only at progression.
For all cohorts, comparison between scenarios (ii) and (i) resulted in ICERs between €9,306 and €10,173 per QALY gained and 5 year budget impacts varying between €6,283,830 and €19,220,405. For all cohorts, comparison between scenarios (iii) and (i) resulted in ICERs between €1,739 and €2,749 per QALY gained and budget impacts varying between €1,468,670 and €5,607,556. For all cohorts, the ICERs (scenario iii versus ii) involved in delayed treatment of asymptomatic (F0) HCV carriers varied between €56,607 and €56,892, well above the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of €20,000 per QALY gained and even above a threshold of €50,000 per QALY gained.
Universal screening for HCV among all pregnant women in the Netherlands is cost-effective. However, it would be reasonable to consider smaller risk groups in view of the budget impact of the intervention.
荷兰孕妇慢性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染的患病率为 0.26%,但仍有许多病例未被诊断。对 HCV 孕妇携带者进行 HCV 筛查和治疗可以减轻疾病负担,并限制母婴垂直传播。我们评估了 HCV 筛查以及随后使用新的直接作用抗病毒药物(DAA)对荷兰孕妇的影响。
我们开发了 HCV 自然史马尔可夫转移状态模型,以评估 HCV 筛查和治疗对公共卫生和经济的影响。除了荷兰的 179,000 名孕妇(队列 1)外,我们还对另外三个队列进行了建模:所有 79,000 名初次怀孕的妇女(队列 2)、33,000 名孕妇移民(队列 3)和 16,000 名初次怀孕的移民妇女(队列 4)。每个队列都在以下几种情况下进行了分析:i 无干预,即当前的做法;ii 筛查和治疗,即最广泛的方法,包括对所有 HCV 阳性的人进行治疗;iii 筛查和治疗/监测,即对有症状(F1-F4)患者进行治疗,并对无症状(F0)HCV 携带者进行随访,只有在进展时才进行治疗。
对于所有队列,方案(ii)与方案(i)之间的比较结果显示,每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量成本效益比(ICER)在 9306 欧元至 10173 欧元之间,5 年预算影响在 628.383 万欧元至 1922.0405 万欧元之间。对于所有队列,方案(iii)与方案(i)之间的比较结果显示,每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量成本效益比(ICER)在 1739 欧元至 2749 欧元之间,5 年预算影响在 1468.67 万欧元至 5607.556 万欧元之间。对于所有队列,方案(iii)与方案(ii)相比,延迟治疗无症状(F0)HCV 携带者的增量成本效益比(ICER)在 56607 欧元至 56892 欧元之间,远高于增量成本效益比(ICER)的意愿支付(WTP)阈值 20000 欧元,甚至高于 50000 欧元的阈值。
对荷兰所有孕妇进行 HCV 普遍筛查是具有成本效益的。然而,鉴于干预措施的预算影响,考虑较小的风险群体是合理的。