• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

圈养斑马雀不孕和胚胎死亡的近因。

Proximate Causes of Infertility and Embryo Mortality in Captive Zebra Finches.

出版信息

Am Nat. 2020 Nov;196(5):577-596. doi: 10.1086/710956. Epub 2020 Sep 28.

DOI:10.1086/710956
PMID:33064590
Abstract

AbstractSome species show high rates of reproductive failure, which is puzzling because natural selection works against such failure in every generation. Hatching failure is common in both captive and wild zebra finches (), yet little is known about its proximate causes. Here we analyze data on reproductive performance (the fate of >23,000 eggs) based on up to 14 years of breeding of four captive zebra finch populations. We find that virtually all aspects of reproductive performance are negatively affected by inbreeding (mean ); by an early-starting, age-related decline (mean ); and by poor early-life nutrition (mean ). However, these effects together explain only about 3% of the variance in infertility, offspring mortality, fecundity, and fitness. In contrast, individual repeatability of different fitness components varied between 15% and 50%. As expected, we found relatively low heritability in fitness components (median: 7% of phenotypic variation and 29% of individually repeatable variation). Yet some of the heritable variation in fitness appears to be maintained by antagonistic pleiotropy (negative genetic correlations) between male fitness traits and female and offspring fitness traits. The large amount of unexplained variation suggests a potentially important role of local dominance and epistasis, including the possibility of segregating genetic incompatibilities.

摘要

摘要

有些物种表现出高比例的繁殖失败,这令人费解,因为自然选择在每一代都反对这种失败。孵化失败在圈养和野生斑马雀()中都很常见,但对其近因知之甚少。在这里,我们分析了基于对四个圈养斑马雀种群长达 14 年的繁殖数据(超过 23000 个卵的命运)。我们发现,繁殖性能的几乎所有方面都受到近交(平均)、与年龄相关的早期衰退(平均)和早期生活营养差(平均)的负面影响。然而,这些影响总共仅解释了不孕、后代死亡率、繁殖力和适应性方差的约 3%。相比之下,不同适应度成分的个体可重复性在 15%至 50%之间变化。不出所料,我们在适应度成分中发现了相对较低的遗传力(中位数:表型变异的 7%和个体可重复变异的 29%)。然而,适应度的一些可遗传变异似乎是由雄性适应度特征与雌性和后代适应度特征之间的拮抗多效性(负遗传相关)维持的。大量无法解释的变异表明局部显性和上位性(包括遗传不相容性分离的可能性)可能发挥了重要作用。

相似文献

1
Proximate Causes of Infertility and Embryo Mortality in Captive Zebra Finches.圈养斑马雀不孕和胚胎死亡的近因。
Am Nat. 2020 Nov;196(5):577-596. doi: 10.1086/710956. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
2
Genetic variation and differentiation in captive and wild zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata).圈养和野生斑胸草雀(Taeniopygia guttata)的遗传变异与分化
Mol Ecol. 2007 Oct;16(19):4039-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03444.x.
3
Quantitative genetics and behavioural correlates of digit ratio in the zebra finch.斑胸草雀指长比的数量遗传学及行为相关性
Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Dec 22;272(1581):2641-9. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3264.
4
Maternal effects influence the sexual behavior of sons and daughters in the zebra finch.母体效应会影响斑胸草雀子代的性行为。
Evolution. 2004 Nov;58(11):2574-83. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb00885.x.
5
The influence of inherited plumage colour morph on morphometric traits and breeding investment in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata).遗传羽色形态对斑胸草雀(Taeniopygia guttata)形态特征和繁殖投入的影响。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 30;12(11):e0188582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188582. eCollection 2017.
6
Trisomy and triploidy are sources of embryo mortality in the zebra finch.三体和三倍体是斑马雀胚胎死亡的原因。
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Sep 7;277(1694):2655-60. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0394. Epub 2010 May 5.
7
A sex-linked supergene with large effects on sperm traits has little impact on reproductive traits in female zebra finches.性连锁超基因对精子特征有很大影响,但对雌性斑胸草雀的繁殖特征影响很小。
Proc Biol Sci. 2024 Mar 27;291(2019):20232796. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.2796.
8
Kin recognition and adjustment of reproductive effort in zebra finches.亲代识别与斑胸草雀繁殖努力的调节
Biol Lett. 2010 Dec 23;6(6):762-4. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0417. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
9
Breeding experience, alternative reproductive strategies and reproductive success in a captive colony of zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata).斑胸草雀(Taeniopygia guttata)圈养群体中的繁殖经验、替代繁殖策略与繁殖成功率
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 27;9(2):e89808. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089808. eCollection 2014.
10
Correlates of male fitness in captive zebra finches--a comparison of methods to disentangle genetic and environmental effects.圈养斑胸草雀雄性适合度的相关因素——解析遗传和环境效应的方法比较。
BMC Evol Biol. 2011 Nov 8;11:327. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-327.

引用本文的文献

1
Male inbreeding reduces fertility, but does not accelerate sperm senescence: an experimental approach in a polyandrous bird.雄性近亲繁殖会降低繁殖力,但不会加速精子衰老:对一种多配偶制鸟类的实验研究
Biol Lett. 2025 Apr;21(4):20250083. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2025.0083. Epub 2025 Apr 30.
2
Same data, different analysts: variation in effect sizes due to analytical decisions in ecology and evolutionary biology.相同的数据,不同的分析者:生态学与进化生物学中因分析决策导致的效应量差异
BMC Biol. 2025 Feb 6;23(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12915-024-02101-x.
3
Demographic drivers of reproductive failure in a threatened bird: Insights from a decade of data.
人口统计学因素对受威胁鸟类繁殖失败的影响:十年数据的启示。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Sep 3;121(36):e2319104121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2319104121. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
4
A sex-linked supergene with large effects on sperm traits has little impact on reproductive traits in female zebra finches.性连锁超基因对精子特征有很大影响,但对雌性斑胸草雀的繁殖特征影响很小。
Proc Biol Sci. 2024 Mar 27;291(2019):20232796. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.2796.
5
Spatial and temporal resource partitioning in a mixed-species colony of avian echolocators.鸟类回声定位者混合种群聚居地中的时空资源分配
Ecol Evol. 2023 Feb 16;13(2):e9805. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9805. eCollection 2023 Feb.
6
Fitness costs of female choosiness are low in a socially monogamous songbird.在社会一夫一妻制的鸣禽中,雌性择偶的适应代价较低。
PLoS Biol. 2021 Nov 4;19(11):e3001257. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001257. eCollection 2021 Nov.
7
A test for meiotic drive in hybrids between Australian and Timor zebra finches.澳大利亚斑马雀与帝汶斑马雀杂交种减数分裂驱动的测试。
Ecol Evol. 2020 Nov 3;10(23):13464-13475. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6951. eCollection 2020 Dec.