Knief Ulrich, Forstmeier Wolfgang, Pei Yifan, Wolf Jochen, Kempenaers Bart
Department of Behavioural Ecology and Evolutionary Genetics Max Planck Institute for Ornithology Seewiesen Germany.
Division of Evolutionary Biology Faculty of Biology Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich Planegg-Martinsried Germany.
Ecol Evol. 2020 Nov 3;10(23):13464-13475. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6951. eCollection 2020 Dec.
Meiotic drivers have been proposed as a potent evolutionary force underlying genetic and phenotypic variation, genome structure, and also speciation. Due to their strong selective advantage, they are expected to rapidly spread through a population despite potentially detrimental effects on organismal fitness. Once fixed, autosomal drivers are cryptic within populations and only become visible in between-population crosses lacking the driver or corresponding suppressor. However, the assumed ubiquity of meiotic drivers has rarely been assessed in crosses between populations or species. Here we test for meiotic drive in hybrid embryos and offspring of Timor and Australian zebra finches-subspecies that have evolved in isolation for about two million years-using 38,541 informative transmissions of 56 markers linked to either centromeres or distal chromosome ends. We did not find evidence for meiotic driver loci on specific chromosomes. However, we observed a weak overall transmission bias toward Timor alleles at centromeres in females (transmission probability of Australian alleles of 47%, nominal = 6 × 10). While this is in line with the centromere drive theory, it goes against the expectation that the subspecies with the larger effective population size (i.e., the Australian zebra finch) should have evolved the more potent meiotic drivers. We thus caution against interpreting our finding as definite evidence for centromeric drive. Yet, weak centromeric meiotic drivers may be more common than generally anticipated and we encourage further studies that are designed to detect also small effect meiotic drivers.
减数分裂驱动被认为是一种强大的进化力量,是遗传和表型变异、基因组结构以及物种形成的基础。由于其强大的选择优势,尽管对生物体适应性可能有不利影响,但预计它们会在种群中迅速传播。一旦固定下来,常染色体驱动在种群中是隐性的,只有在缺乏驱动或相应抑制因子的种群间杂交中才会显现出来。然而,减数分裂驱动的普遍存在性很少在种群或物种间的杂交中得到评估。在这里,我们利用与着丝粒或染色体末端相连的56个标记的38541次信息传递,对帝汶岛和澳大利亚斑胸草雀(已独立进化约200万年的亚种)的杂交胚胎和后代进行减数分裂驱动测试。我们没有在特定染色体上发现减数分裂驱动基因座的证据。然而,我们观察到雌性着丝粒处总体上对帝汶岛等位基因存在微弱的传递偏差(澳大利亚等位基因的传递概率为47%,名义值=6×10)。虽然这与着丝粒驱动理论一致,但与有效种群规模较大的亚种(即澳大利亚斑胸草雀)应该进化出更强有力的减数分裂驱动的预期相悖。因此,我们提醒不要将我们的发现解释为着丝粒驱动的确切证据。然而,微弱的着丝粒减数分裂驱动可能比一般预期的更为普遍,我们鼓励开展进一步研究,旨在检测出效应较小的减数分裂驱动。