• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

托法替尼和巴瑞替尼相关的静脉血栓栓塞风险:系统评价和间接荟萃分析。

Risk of Venous Thromboembolism Associated With Tofacitinib and Baricitinib: A Systematic Review and Indirect Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Pharmacy Department, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain.

Pharmacy Department, Hospital Universitari Mútua Terrassa, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Pharmacotherapy. 2020 Dec;40(12):1248-1264. doi: 10.1002/phar.2472. Epub 2020 Nov 16.

DOI:10.1002/phar.2472
PMID:33064892
Abstract

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the effect of tofacitinib and baricitinib on venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk. Search of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, LILACS, and Google Scholar databases to identify controlled observational and clinical trials reporting on adverse effects in patients treated with oral tofacitinib or baricitinib up to July 2020. The outcome measure was occurrence of VTE events. We analyzed 59 studies involving 14,335 patients treated with tofacitinib or baricitinib and 11,612 patients who received another active drug or placebo. The meta-analysis showed an odds ratio (OR) for VTE events of 0.29 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.10-0.84) overall for tofacitinib based on data from 10 clinical trials with 15 treatment arms; similar ORs were observed for the 10 mg/d dose (OR = 0.18; 95% CI = 0.02-1.60) and the 20 mg/d dose (OR = 0.19; 95% CI = 0.04-0.91). The ORs for VTE events for baricitinib were 3.39 (95% CI = 0.82-14.04) overall, 3.05 (95% CI = 0.12-75.43) for 2 mg, 3.64 (95% CI = 0.59-22.46) for 4 mg, and 3.0 (95% CI = 0.12-76.49) for 7 mg. The indirect meta-analysis comparing tofacitinib with baricitinib (10 clinical trials with 15 treatment arms) showed an OR for VTE events of 0.086 (95% CI = 0.02-0.51) for tofacitinib and a superior safety profile for VTE events. In the meta-regression analysis (19 clinical trials with 21 treatment arms), the effect was 0.02 (95% CI = -0.04 to 0.08) for tofacitinib and -0.01 (95% CI = -1.29 to 1.26 for baricitinib. Plotting of the data for tofacitinib showed that VTE risk increased with high doses. The effect, however, was less than 1 for the 10-mg and 20-mg doses, indicating a protective effect. This effect was not observed for baricitinib. Tofacitinib is not associated with an increased risk of VTE and has a superior safety profile to baricitinib in this respect. Tofacitinib may exert a protective effect against VTE.

摘要

进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以调查托法替尼和巴瑞替尼对静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)风险的影响。检索PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science、Scopus、ClinicalTrials.gov、LILACS 和 Google Scholar 数据库,以确定截至 2020 年 7 月报告口服托法替尼或巴瑞替尼治疗患者不良事件的对照观察性和临床试验。结局指标为 VTE 事件的发生。我们分析了 59 项研究,共纳入 14335 例接受托法替尼或巴瑞替尼治疗的患者和 11612 例接受另一种活性药物或安慰剂治疗的患者。荟萃分析显示,托法替尼治疗 VTE 事件的优势比(OR)总体为 0.29(95%置信区间[CI]:0.10-0.84),基于 10 项临床试验(15 个治疗臂)的数据;对于 10mg/d 剂量(OR=0.18;95%CI=0.02-1.60)和 20mg/d 剂量(OR=0.19;95%CI=0.04-0.91),也观察到了类似的 OR。巴瑞替尼治疗 VTE 事件的 OR 总体为 3.39(95%CI=0.82-14.04),2mg 为 3.05(95%CI=0.12-75.43),4mg 为 3.64(95%CI=0.59-22.46),7mg 为 3.0(95%CI=0.12-76.49)。比较托法替尼和巴瑞替尼的间接荟萃分析(10 项临床试验,15 个治疗臂)显示,托法替尼治疗 VTE 事件的 OR 为 0.086(95%CI=0.02-0.51),VTE 事件的安全性状况更好。在荟萃回归分析(19 项临床试验,21 个治疗臂)中,托法替尼的效应为 0.02(95%CI=-0.04 至 0.08),巴瑞替尼的效应为-0.01(95%CI=-1.29 至 1.26)。托法替尼的数据图显示,随着剂量的增加,VTE 风险增加。然而,对于 10mg 和 20mg 剂量,其效果小于 1,表明具有保护作用。在巴瑞替尼中未观察到这种作用。托法替尼与 VTE 风险增加无关,在这方面具有优于巴瑞替尼的安全性。托法替尼可能对 VTE 有保护作用。

相似文献

1
Risk of Venous Thromboembolism Associated With Tofacitinib and Baricitinib: A Systematic Review and Indirect Meta-Analysis.托法替尼和巴瑞替尼相关的静脉血栓栓塞风险:系统评价和间接荟萃分析。
Pharmacotherapy. 2020 Dec;40(12):1248-1264. doi: 10.1002/phar.2472. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Tofacitinib, Baricitinib, and Upadacitinib for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.托法替布、巴瑞替尼和乌帕替尼治疗类风湿关节炎的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2020 Jul;95(7):1404-1419. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.01.039. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
3
Comparative efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, filgotinib and peficitinib as monotherapy for active rheumatoid arthritis.托法替布、巴瑞替尼、乌帕替尼、费卢替尼和培非替尼单药治疗活动性类风湿关节炎的疗效和安全性比较。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2020 Aug;45(4):674-681. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13142. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
4
Thromboembolic Safety Reporting of Tofacitinib and Baricitinib: An Analysis of the WHO VigiBase.托法替尼和巴瑞替尼的血栓栓塞安全性报告:世卫组织 VigiBase 分析。
Drug Saf. 2020 Sep;43(9):881-891. doi: 10.1007/s40264-020-00958-9.
5
Adverse cardiovascular events in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with JAK inhibitors: An analysis of postmarketing spontaneous safety reports.JAK 抑制剂治疗类风湿关节炎患者的心血管不良事件:上市后自发安全性报告分析。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2024 Aug;67:152461. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152461. Epub 2024 May 17.
6
The efficacy and safety of different Janus kinase inhibitors as monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.不同 Janus 激酶抑制剂单药治疗类风湿关节炎的疗效和安全性:一项贝叶斯网状荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 21;19(6):e0305621. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305621. eCollection 2024.
7
Critical Assessment of Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interaction Potential of Tofacitinib, Baricitinib and Upadacitinib, the Three Approved Janus Kinase Inhibitors for Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment.三种获批用于治疗类风湿关节炎的 Janus 激酶抑制剂(托法替布、巴瑞替尼和乌帕替尼)的药代动力学药物相互作用潜力的关键性评估。
Drug Saf. 2020 Aug;43(8):711-725. doi: 10.1007/s40264-020-00938-z.
8
Higher infection risk for JAK inhibitors tofacitinib and baricitinib compared to subcutaneous biological DMARDs.与皮下注射生物性改善病情抗风湿药相比,JAK抑制剂托法替布和巴瑞替尼的感染风险更高。
Clin Rheumatol. 2024 Jun;43(6):2133-2138. doi: 10.1007/s10067-024-06980-x. Epub 2024 May 4.
9
Cumulative incidence and risk of infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with janus kinase inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Janus 激酶抑制剂治疗类风湿关节炎患者的累积感染发生率和风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 31;19(7):e0306548. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306548. eCollection 2024.
10
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and baricitinib in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.托法替布与巴瑞替尼治疗活动性类风湿关节炎患者的疗效和安全性比较:一项随机对照试验的贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
Z Rheumatol. 2019 Aug;78(6):559-567. doi: 10.1007/s00393-018-0531-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Janus kinase inhibitor treatment for inflammatory diseases: excess or no excess risk of venous thromboembolism?Janus激酶抑制剂治疗炎症性疾病:静脉血栓栓塞风险是否过高?
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2024 Dec 31;9(1):102667. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102667. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
A Case of Superficial Thrombo-occlusive Vascular Disease in a Patient With Rheumatoid Arthritis.类风湿关节炎患者的浅表血栓闭塞性血管病一例。
J Rheum Dis. 2022 Jul 1;29(3):187-189. doi: 10.4078/jrd.2022.29.3.187.
3
Oral Janus kinase inhibitors in the treatment of atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
口服 Janus 激酶抑制剂治疗特应性皮炎:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Skin Health Dis. 2022 May 23;3(1):e133. doi: 10.1002/ski2.133. eCollection 2023 Feb.
4
Venous Thromboembolism in Rheumatoid Arthritis: The Added Effect of Disease Activity to Traditional Risk Factors.类风湿关节炎中的静脉血栓栓塞:疾病活动度对传统危险因素的附加影响。
Open Access Rheumatol. 2022 Oct 17;14:231-242. doi: 10.2147/OARRR.S284757. eCollection 2022.
5
Oral Janus kinase inhibitors and venous thromboembolic events in atopic dermatitis: protocols for a case-time control study and a nested case-control study based on the French national health insurance (SNDS) cohort.口服 JAK 抑制剂与特应性皮炎的静脉血栓栓塞事件:基于法国国家健康保险(SNDS)队列的病例时间对照研究和巢式病例对照研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 21;12(9):e059979. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059979.
6
Tofacitinib and newer JAK inhibitors in inflammatory bowel disease-where we are and where we are going.托法替布及新型JAK抑制剂在炎症性肠病中的应用现状与未来发展方向
Drugs Context. 2022 Apr 8;11. doi: 10.7573/dic.2021-11-4. eCollection 2022.
7
Effect of Anti-Rheumatic Drugs on Cardiovascular Disease Events in Rheumatoid Arthritis.抗风湿药物对类风湿关节炎患者心血管疾病事件的影响
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Feb 3;8:812631. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.812631. eCollection 2021.
8
An updated overview of recent advances, challenges, and clinical considerations of IL-6 signaling blockade in severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).白细胞介素 6 信号阻断在严重 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)中的最新进展、挑战和临床考虑的更新概述。
Int Immunopharmacol. 2022 Apr;105:108536. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.108536. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
9
Extra-Articular Manifestations and Comorbidities in Psoriatic Disease: A Journey Into the Immunologic Crosstalk.银屑病的关节外表现及合并症:免疫串扰之旅
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Sep 23;8:737079. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.737079. eCollection 2021.
10
Risk of venous thromboembolism associated with Janus kinase inhibitors for rheumatoid arthritis: case presentation and literature review.与类风湿关节炎相关的 Janus 激酶抑制剂的静脉血栓栓塞风险:病例报告和文献复习。
Clin Rheumatol. 2021 Nov;40(11):4457-4471. doi: 10.1007/s10067-021-05911-4. Epub 2021 Sep 23.