• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胎儿生物物理评分与围产期死亡

Fetal biophysical profile and perinatal death.

作者信息

Baskett T F, Allen A C, Gray J H, Young D C, Young L M

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Sep;70(3 Pt 1):357-60.

PMID:3306498
Abstract

Antepartum assessment of 5034 high-risk pregnancies to predict perinatal death included five biophysical variables (nonstress test, fetal breathing movements, fetal movements, fetal tone, and amniotic fluid volume) which combined to form a biophysical profile score. We assessed 4148 fetuses within seven days of delivery. The ability of each variable to predict perinatal death was expressed as the likelihood ratio, which incorporates sensitivity and specificity into one number. The predictive ability was most accurate with fetal movement (likelihood ratio 48.1) and the combined biophysical profile score (likelihood ratio 51.0). The biophysical profile score was more likely to predict perinatal death due to asphyxia (seven of eight) than lethal anomaly (six of 19). The overall perinatal mortality was 7.6 per 1000 total births. The perinatal mortality rate was 1.0 for a normal biophysical profile score, 31.3 for an equivocal score, and 200.0 for an abnormal score. The false-negative rate for the biophysical profile score was 0.7 per 1000.

摘要

对5034例高危妊娠进行产前评估以预测围产期死亡,评估内容包括五个生物物理变量(无应激试验、胎儿呼吸运动、胎动、胎儿肌张力和羊水量),这些变量综合形成生物物理评分。我们在分娩前7天内对4148例胎儿进行了评估。每个变量预测围产期死亡的能力用似然比表示,似然比将敏感度和特异度合并为一个数值。胎动(似然比48.1)和综合生物物理评分(似然比51.0)预测能力最为准确。生物物理评分预测因窒息导致的围产期死亡(8例中的7例)比致命性异常(19例中的6例)更有可能。总的围产期死亡率为每1000例总出生数中有7.6例。生物物理评分正常时围产期死亡率为1.0,评分可疑时为31.3,评分异常时为200.0。生物物理评分的假阴性率为每1000例中有0.7例。

相似文献

1
Fetal biophysical profile and perinatal death.胎儿生物物理评分与围产期死亡
Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Sep;70(3 Pt 1):357-60.
2
Perinatal outcome with the modified biophysical profile.改良生物物理评分的围产期结局
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Jun;170(6):1672-6.
3
A prospective trial of the fetal biophysical profile versus the nonstress test in the management of high-risk pregnancies.一项关于胎儿生物物理评分与无应激试验在高危妊娠管理中的前瞻性试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Nov 15;153(6):624-33.
4
Further experience with the fetal biophysical profile.胎儿生物物理评分的进一步经验
Obstet Gynecol. 1983 Apr;61(4):480-5.
5
Biophysical profile for antepartum fetal assessment.产前胎儿评估的生物物理评分
Am Fam Physician. 1986 Oct;34(4):83-9.
6
Antenatal fetal assessment using biophysical profile score.使用生物物理评分进行产前胎儿评估。
Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull. 1996 Aug;22(2):51-9.
7
[Biophysical profile in prolonged pregnancy. Another alternative of fetal surveillance].[过期妊娠的生物物理评分。胎儿监护的另一种选择]
Ginecol Obstet Mex. 1990 Oct;58:284-8.
8
Fetal biophysical profile score in triplet pregnancies.三胎妊娠中的胎儿生物物理评分
J Reprod Med. 1994 Jun;39(6):436-40.
9
[Prediction of fetal hypoxia using the fetal biophysical profile].[利用胎儿生物物理评分预测胎儿缺氧]
Cesk Gynekol. 1989 Dec;54(10):733-9.
10
A modified biophysical profile for antenatal fetal surveillance.一种用于产前胎儿监测的改良生物物理评分法。
Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Mar;71(3 Pt 1):365-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of Prenatal Care Services, Maternal Morbidity, and Perinatal Mortality With the Advanced Maternal Age Cutoff of 35 Years.产前保健服务、产妇发病率和围产儿死亡率与 35 岁高龄产妇截止线的关联。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Dec 3;2(12):e214044. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.4044. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
A scoring system predicting the clinical course of CLPB defect based on the foetal and neonatal presentation of 31 patients.基于 31 例胎儿和新生儿表现的 CLPB 缺陷临床病程预测评分系统。
J Inherit Metab Dis. 2017 Nov;40(6):853-860. doi: 10.1007/s10545-017-0057-z. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
3
Fetal ultrasonography.
胎儿超声检查
West J Med. 1993 Sep;159(3):273-85.
4
Regarding criticism on update of MSAFP policy statement from the ASHG.关于美国人类遗传学会(ASHG)对母血清甲胎蛋白(MSAFP)政策声明更新的批评。
Am J Hum Genet. 1990 Oct;47(4):740-1.