Ahram J, Feinstein S J, DePhillips H
Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Sep;70(3 Pt 1):405-7.
A survey was mailed to all 292 nonmilitary obstetrics and gynecology residency programs in the United States. The extent and type of ultrasound training and degree of compliance with recommended guidelines was evaluated from the 230 (78.8%) responses. Criteria for evaluation were based on guidelines from the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine Joint Task Group on Training for Diagnosis in Obstetrical and Gynecological Ultrasound, and on recommendations from The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Although almost 98% of respondents claimed to have ultrasound "training" in their programs, more than 55% indicated no resident experience with either reading or writing ultrasound reports, and only 39% of program chiefs claimed greater experience than 200 ultrasound scans per resident over four years. Overall, it appears that current suggested guidelines are not being met.
一项调查被邮寄给了美国所有292个非军事妇产科住院医师培训项目。根据230份（78.8%）回复评估了超声培训的范围和类型以及对推荐指南的遵守程度。评估标准基于美国医学超声学会妇产科超声诊断培训联合任务组的指南以及美国妇产科医师学会的建议。尽管近98%的受访者称其所在项目有超声“培训”，但超过55%的人表示住院医师没有阅读或撰写超声报告的经验，且只有39%的项目负责人称每位住院医师在四年内的超声扫描经验超过200次。总体而言，目前似乎未达到建议的指南要求。
