Division of Cardiology, Triemli Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland; Institute of Primary Care, University of Zürich, Switzerland.
Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zürich, Switzerland.
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Jan 15;139:15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.09.054. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
The glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor eptifibatide, administered as bolus followed by infusion, is an adjunctive antithrombotic treatment during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in selected patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Whether both bolus and infusion are necessary to improve outcomes is unknown. We hypothesized that primary PCI with eptifibatide bolus only is non-inferior to the conventional treatment (bolus and infusion) with regard to infarct size, while reducing bleeding complications. We analyzed 720 consecutive STEMI patients receiving eptifibatide bolus only or conventional treatment in an observational case-control study utilizing propensity score matching of clinical and intervention-specific confounders. Infarct size was estimated based on myocardial bound creatine kinase, creatine kinase (CK), and CK area under the curve values, with a prespecified non-inferiority margin of 20%. Major bleeding was defined as type 2, 3, or 5 on the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium classification. Eptifibatide bolus only was administered to 147 patients (20%), which were matched 1:1 to patients receiving conventional treatment. Based on peak myocardial bound creatine kinase, CK and CK area under the curve values, infarct size was -8.4% (95% CI [-31.2%, 14.4%]), -11.6% (95% CI [-33.5%, 10.3%]), and -13.9% (95% CI [-34.1%, 6.2%]) after eptifibatide bolus, respectively, reaching prespecified noninferiority compared with conventional treatment. Bolus treatment significantly reduced major bleeding complications (OR 0.48, 95% CI [0.30, 0.79]). In conclusion, eptifibatide given as abbreviated bolus only to selected STEMI patients who underwent primary PCI was noninferior regarding infarct size and resulted in less bleeding complications compared with conventional bolus and infusion treatment.
血小板糖蛋白 IIb/IIIa 抑制剂依替巴肽,以推注继以输注的方式给药,是 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)时的辅助抗血栓治疗选择之一。但尚不清楚推注和输注是否都需要以改善结局。我们假设,与传统治疗(推注和输注)相比,仅接受依替巴肽推注的直接 PCI 在梗死面积方面不劣效,同时减少出血并发症。我们利用倾向性评分匹配临床和介入特定混杂因素,对接受依替巴肽推注或传统治疗的 720 例连续 STEMI 患者进行了观察性病例对照研究分析。基于心肌结合肌酸激酶、肌酸激酶(CK)和 CK 曲线下面积,估计梗死面积,并设定了 20%的非劣效性边界。根据出血学术研究联合会(BARC)分类,主要出血定义为 2、3 或 5 型。147 例患者(20%)接受了依替巴肽推注,与接受传统治疗的患者 1:1 匹配。基于峰值心肌结合肌酸激酶、CK 和 CK 曲线下面积,依替巴肽推注后的梗死面积分别为-8.4%(95%CI[-31.2%,14.4%])、-11.6%(95%CI[-33.5%,10.3%])和-13.9%(95%CI[-34.1%,6.2%]),与传统治疗相比达到了预设的非劣效性。推注治疗显著减少了主要出血并发症(OR 0.48,95%CI[0.30,0.79])。结论:与传统的推注和输注治疗相比,对于接受直接 PCI 的选择 STEMI 患者,仅给予依替巴肽短程推注在梗死面积方面不劣效,且出血并发症更少。