Department of Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Departments of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Ann Surg. 2021 Dec 1;274(6):e465-e472. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004564.
We conducted a multicenter randomized prospective phase 2 trial of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) versus chemotherapy (CT) as initial induction therapy for conversion surgery (CS) in clinical T4b esophageal cancer. We compared treatment effects and adverse events (AEs).
Although induction followed by CS is potentially curative for T4b esophageal cancer, the optimal initial induction treatment is unclear.
Ninety-nine patients with T4b esophageal cancer were randomly allocated to chemoradiotherapy (Group A, n = 49) or CT (Group B, n = 50) as initial induction treatment. CRT consisted of radiation (50.4 Gy) with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. CT consisted of 2 cycles of docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF). CRT or CT was followed by CS if resectable. If unresectable, the patient received the other treatment as secondary treatment. CS was performed if resectable after secondary treatment. The primary end point was 2-year overall survival.
In Group A, CS was performed in 34 (69%) and 7 patients (14%) after initial and secondary treatment. In Group B, CS was performed in 25 (50%) and 17 patients (34%) after initial and secondary treatment. The R0 resection rate after initial and secondary treatment was similar (78% vs 76%, P = 1.000). AEs including leukopenia, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and diarrhea were significantly more frequent in Group B. Group A had better histological complete response of the primary tumor (40% vs 17%, P = 0.028) and histological nodal status (P = 0.038).
Upfront CRT was superior to upfront CT in terms of pathological effects and AEs. The Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (s051180164).
我们进行了一项多中心、随机、前瞻性 2 期临床试验,比较了放化疗(CRT)与化疗(CT)作为临床 T4b 食管癌转化手术(CS)初始诱导治疗的效果。我们比较了两种治疗方法的疗效和不良反应(AEs)。
尽管诱导后行 CS 对 T4b 食管癌有潜在的治愈作用,但最佳的初始诱导治疗方法尚不清楚。
99 例 T4b 食管癌患者被随机分配至 CRT 组(A 组,n=49)或 CT 组(B 组,n=50)作为初始诱导治疗。CRT 包括放疗(50.4Gy)联合顺铂和 5-氟尿嘧啶。CT 包括 2 周期多西紫杉醇联合顺铂和 5-氟尿嘧啶(DCF)。如果可切除,则 CRT 或 CT 后行 CS。如果不可切除,则患者接受另一种治疗作为二线治疗。二线治疗后如果可切除,则行 CS。主要终点是 2 年总生存率。
A 组中,34 例(69%)和 7 例(14%)患者在初始和二线治疗后接受了 CS。B 组中,25 例(50%)和 17 例(34%)患者在初始和二线治疗后接受了 CS。初始和二线治疗后的 R0 切除率相似(78%比 76%,P=1.000)。B 组白细胞减少、中性粒细胞减少、发热性中性粒细胞减少和腹泻等不良反应发生率明显较高。A 组原发肿瘤的组织学完全缓解率(40%比 17%,P=0.028)和组织学淋巴结状态(P=0.038)更好。
与 CT 相比, upfront CRT 在病理疗效和不良反应方面具有优势。日本临床试验注册(s051180164)。