• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤性髋部骨折和原发性选择性全髋关节置换术患者并不相同:共病负担、住院过程、术后并发症和医疗成本分析比较。

Traumatic Hip Fracture and Primary Elective Total Hip Patients are Not the Same: A Comparison of Comorbidity Burden, Hospital Course, Postoperative Complications, and Cost of Care Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine Tucson, Tucson, AZ.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ; and.

出版信息

J Orthop Trauma. 2020 Nov;34(11):583-588. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001800.

DOI:10.1097/BOT.0000000000001800
PMID:33065658
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare patient admission comorbidity profiles, length of stay, readmission rate, postoperative complications, mortality rate, and cost of care between acute geriatric hip fractures (HF) and elective total hip arthroplasties (THA).

METHODS

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Multicenter health care system.

PATIENTS

Eighteen thousand forty-two geriatric HF treated with operative fixation or arthroplasty and 8761 elective total hip patients were reviewed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Charlson Comorbidity Index, length of stay, ICU admission, readmission rate, postoperative complications, mortality rates, and cost of care.

RESULTS

Medical comorbidities: chronic pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, coronary artery disease, heart failure, liver cirrhosis, and cerebrovascular disease were higher in HF patients as was mean Charlson Comorbidity Index (P < 0.001). Albumin was lower and HgbA1c higher in HF patients (P < 0.001). Average length of stay was 5.0 versus 2.6 days (P < 0.001) with 8.5% of HF patients being managed in the ICU versus 1.8% of THA patients. Readmission rates for HF and THA patients were 21.4% and 6.2%, respectively (P < 0.001). Minor and major complications were higher in the HF cohort (P < 0.001), as were 30-day (1.97% vs. 0.17%) and 1-year mortality rates (3.49% vs. 0.40%) (P < 0.001). Mean hospital cost of care was nearly 15,000 US dollars more expensive in HF patients when compared to the elective THA cohort (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

HF patients have increased comorbidity burdens, lengths of stay, ICU admissions, readmission rates, complications, mortality, and costs of care than patients with elective total hip arthroplasty. In the era of pay for quality performance, health systems must reconcile the difference between these 2 patient cohorts.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

目的

比较急性老年髋部骨折(HF)和择期全髋关节置换术(THA)患者的入院合并症谱、住院时间、再入院率、术后并发症、死亡率和医疗费用。

方法

回顾性队列研究。

设置

多中心医疗保健系统。

患者

接受手术固定或关节置换治疗的 18042 例老年 HF 患者和 8761 例择期全髋关节置换患者。

主要观察指标

Charlson 合并症指数、住院时间、重症监护病房(ICU)入院率、再入院率、术后并发症、死亡率和医疗费用。

结果

合并症:慢性肺部疾病、慢性肾脏病、冠状动脉疾病、心力衰竭、肝硬化和脑血管疾病在 HF 患者中更为常见,且平均 Charlson 合并症指数更高(P<0.001)。HF 患者的白蛋白水平较低,HgbA1c 水平较高(P<0.001)。HF 患者的平均住院时间为 5.0 天,而 THA 患者为 2.6 天(P<0.001),8.5%的 HF 患者在 ICU 接受治疗,而 THA 患者为 1.8%。HF 和 THA 患者的再入院率分别为 21.4%和 6.2%(P<0.001)。HF 患者的轻微和主要并发症发生率更高(P<0.001),30 天(1.97%比 0.17%)和 1 年死亡率(3.49%比 0.40%)也更高(P<0.001)。与择期 THA 患者相比,HF 患者的住院总费用高出近 15000 美元(P<0.001)。

结论

与择期全髋关节置换术患者相比,HF 患者的合并症负担、住院时间、ICU 入院率、再入院率、并发症、死亡率和医疗费用更高。在按质量绩效付费的时代,医疗体系必须协调这两组患者之间的差异。

证据等级

预后 III 级。有关证据等级的完整描述,请参阅作者说明。

相似文献

1
Traumatic Hip Fracture and Primary Elective Total Hip Patients are Not the Same: A Comparison of Comorbidity Burden, Hospital Course, Postoperative Complications, and Cost of Care Analysis.创伤性髋部骨折和原发性选择性全髋关节置换术患者并不相同:共病负担、住院过程、术后并发症和医疗成本分析比较。
J Orthop Trauma. 2020 Nov;34(11):583-588. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001800.
2
Hospital Discharge within 2 Days Following Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty Does Not Increase Major-Complication and Readmission Rates.全髋关节或膝关节置换术后2天内出院不会增加主要并发症和再入院率。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Sep 7;98(17):1419-28. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01109.
3
Complications Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Nationwide Database Study Comparing Elective vs Hip Fracture Cases.全髋关节置换术后的并发症:一项全国范围内数据库研究比较择期手术与髋部骨折病例。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Aug;35(8):2144-2148.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.03.006. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
4
Are There Modifiable Risk Factors for Hospital Readmission After Total Hip Arthroplasty in a US Healthcare System?在美国医疗系统中,全髋关节置换术后再次入院是否存在可改变的风险因素?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Nov;473(11):3446-55. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4278-x.
5
Which Clinical and Patient Factors Influence the National Economic Burden of Hospital Readmissions After Total Joint Arthroplasty?哪些临床和患者因素会影响全关节置换术后再入院的国家经济负担?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Dec;475(12):2926-2937. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5244-6.
6
The Frank Stinchfield Award : Total Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture Is Not a Typical DRG 470: A Propensity-matched Cohort Study.弗兰克·斯廷奇菲尔德奖:股骨颈骨折的全髋关节置换术并非典型的诊断相关分组470:一项倾向匹配队列研究
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Feb;475(2):353-360. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4868-2.
7
Predictors for readmission following primary total hip and total knee arthroplasty.初次全髋关节和全膝关节置换术后再入院的预测因素。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2020 Sep-Dec;28(3):2309499020959160. doi: 10.1177/2309499020959160.
8
Factors associated with hospital stay length, discharge destination, and 30-day readmission rate after primary hip or knee arthroplasty: Retrospective Cohort Study.初次髋关节或膝关节置换术后住院时间、出院去向和 30 天再入院率的相关因素:回顾性队列研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Sep;105(5):949-955. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.04.012. Epub 2019 Jun 15.
9
Higher Rates of Readmission After Acute Total Hip Arthroplasty Versus Open Reduction Internal Fixation for Elderly Acetabular Fractures, a National Study From 2010 to 2019.老年人髋臼骨折行全髋关节置换术与切开复位内固定术后的高再入院率:一项 2010 年至 2019 年的全国性研究。
J Orthop Trauma. 2023 Jul 1;37(7):334-340. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002575.
10
Hip Arthroplasty for Fracture vs Elective Care: One Bundle Does Not Fit All.骨折与择期治疗的髋关节置换术:一种方案并不适用于所有人。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Aug;32(8):2353-2358. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.061. Epub 2017 Mar 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Hypoalbuminemia associated perioperative mortality, reoperation, and readmission rates among total joint arthroplasty procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.全关节置换手术中低蛋白血症相关的围手术期死亡率、再次手术率和再入院率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Aug 9;35(1):342. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04468-1.
2
Interpretable machine learning for predicting optimal surgical timing in polytrauma patients with TBI and fractures to reduce postoperative infection risk.可解释的机器学习用于预测合并创伤性脑损伤和骨折的多发伤患者的最佳手术时机,以降低术后感染风险。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 26;15(1):18347. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04003-6.
3
Incidence and risk factors for stroke after hip fracture: a meta-analysis.
髋部骨折后卒中的发生率及危险因素:一项荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 17;13(1):17618. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44917-7.
4
Associations of Smoking With Delirium and Opioid Use in Older Adults With Traumatic Hip Fracture.吸烟与老年髋部骨折患者谵妄和阿片类药物使用的相关性。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2022 May 1;6(5):e21.00188. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00188.
5
Early outcomes after hip fracture surgery in COVID-19 patients in New York City.纽约市新冠肺炎患者髋部骨折手术后的早期结果
J Orthop. 2020 Jun 6;21:291-296. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.06.003. eCollection 2020 Sep-Oct.