• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗抑郁药情绪不良副作用的评估:一项随访研究。

Evaluation of Emotional Adverse Effects of Antidepressants: A Follow-up Study.

机构信息

From the Department of Psychiatry, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, İzmir.

Psychiatry Clinic, Manisa Mental Health and Diseases Hospital, Manisa.

出版信息

J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2020 Nov/Dec;40(6):594-598. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001300.

DOI:10.1097/JCP.0000000000001300
PMID:33065720
Abstract

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: Emotional adverse effects due to antidepressant use may cause difficulties for the clinician in the treatment of depression. In this prospective study, the emotional adverse effects of antidepressants were evaluated in various aspects.

METHODS/PROCEDURES: Ninety eight patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder were included in the study. At 2nd, 4th, 8th, 12th, and 16th weeks, patients were assessed with Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and the antidepressant dose was increased in patients with less than a 50% reduction at each visit compared with the initial MADRS score. The Oxford Questionnaire on the Emotional Side-effects of Antidepressants (OQESA) was used at the 8th-week and 16th-week visits.

FINDINGS/RESULTS: A significant difference is found in the OQESA score at the 8th-week visit compared with the 16th-week assessment (P < 0.001, t = 5.73). There were significant correlations between MADRS scores and OQESA scores both at the 8th (r = 0.346, P = 0.05) and the 16th (r = 0.490, P < 0.001) weeks. In regression analyses, at eighth-week assessment, MADRS score (B = 1.487, P = 0.002) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor use (B = 14.014, P = 0.023) had a significantly predicted OQESA score.

IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: In this study, it is found that, as the rate of remitted patients is increased, OQESA scores get decreased, and furthermore, the OQESA score of the remitted group is statistically low when compared with that of the nonremitted group at the 8th- and 16th-week visits. Oxford Questionnaire on the Emotional Side-effects of Antidepressants and MADRS scores are significantly correlated in all assessments. These results suggest that the score obtained from OQESA may be related not only to the emotional adverse effects of antidepressants but also to the residual symptoms of depression.

摘要

目的/背景:抗抑郁药引起的情绪不良反应可能会给临床医生的抑郁症治疗带来困难。在这项前瞻性研究中,评估了抗抑郁药在各个方面的情绪不良反应。

方法/过程:本研究纳入了 98 例被诊断为重度抑郁症的患者。在第 2、4、8、12 和 16 周时,使用蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)对患者进行评估,如果与初始 MADRS 评分相比,每位患者的评分减少不足 50%,则会增加抗抑郁药的剂量。在第 8 周和第 16 周就诊时使用牛津抗抑郁药情绪副作用问卷(OQESA)。

结果

第 8 周就诊时的 OQESA 评分与第 16 周评估时相比有显著差异(P < 0.001,t = 5.73)。在第 8 周和第 16 周时,MADRS 评分与 OQESA 评分之间均存在显著相关性(r = 0.346,P = 0.05;r = 0.490,P < 0.001)。在回归分析中,在第 8 周评估时,MADRS 评分(B = 1.487,P = 0.002)和选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂的使用(B = 14.014,P = 0.023)对 OQESA 评分有显著的预测作用。

结论

在这项研究中发现,随着缓解患者的比例增加,OQESA 评分降低,而且,在第 8 周和第 16 周就诊时,缓解组的 OQESA 评分明显低于未缓解组。在所有评估中,牛津抗抑郁药情绪副作用问卷和 MADRS 评分均显著相关。这些结果表明,OQESA 获得的评分不仅与抗抑郁药的情绪不良反应有关,而且与抑郁症的残留症状有关。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Emotional Adverse Effects of Antidepressants: A Follow-up Study.抗抑郁药情绪不良副作用的评估:一项随访研究。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2020 Nov/Dec;40(6):594-598. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001300.
2
Emotional blunting with antidepressant treatments: A survey among depressed patients.抗抑郁治疗导致的情感迟钝:对抑郁症患者的一项调查。
J Affect Disord. 2017 Oct 15;221:31-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.05.048. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
3
Efficacy and Safety of Basimglurant as Adjunctive Therapy for Major Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial.巴米谷氨酸辅助治疗重性抑郁症的疗效和安全性:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 Jul 1;73(7):675-84. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.0838.
4
Comparative evaluation of efficacy and tolerability of vilazodone, escitalopram, and amitriptyline in patients of major depressive disorder: A randomized, parallel, open-label clinical study.比较维拉唑酮、艾司西酞普兰和阿米替林治疗重度抑郁症患者的疗效和耐受性:一项随机、平行、开放标签的临床研究。
Indian J Pharmacol. 2020 Mar-Apr;52(2):79-85. doi: 10.4103/ijp.IJP_441_18. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
5
Single i.v. ketamine augmentation of newly initiated escitalopram for major depression: results from a randomized, placebo-controlled 4-week study.单次静脉注射氯胺酮增强新起始的艾司西酞普兰治疗重度抑郁症的疗效:一项随机、安慰剂对照的4周研究结果
Psychol Med. 2016 Feb;46(3):623-35. doi: 10.1017/S0033291715002159. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
6
The efficacy profile of vilazodone, a novel antidepressant for the treatment of major depressive disorder.维拉唑酮治疗重性抑郁障碍的疗效概况。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Jan;28(1):27-39. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.628303. Epub 2011 Nov 23.
7
Double-blind comparison of escitalopram and duloxetine in the acute treatment of major depressive disorder.艾司西酞普兰与度洛西汀治疗重度抑郁症急性期的双盲对照研究
Clin Drug Investig. 2007;27(7):481-92. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200727070-00005.
8
Impact of subjective vs. objective remission status on subjective cognitive impairments in depression.主观缓解与客观缓解状态对抑郁症患者主观认知损害的影响。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Mar 1;246:99-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.049. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
9
No predictors of antidepressant patient response to milnacipran were obtained using the three-factor structures of the Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale in Japanese patients with major depressive disorders.在患有重度抑郁症的日本患者中,使用蒙哥马利和阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表的三因素结构未获得抗抑郁药患者对米那普明反应的预测指标。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2008 Apr;62(2):197-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2008.01755.x.
10
The Oxford Questionnaire on the Emotional Side-effects of Antidepressants (OQuESA): development, validity, reliability and sensitivity to change.牛津抗抑郁药情绪副作用问卷(OQuESA):开发、有效性、可靠性及对变化的敏感性。
J Affect Disord. 2012 Sep;140(1):66-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.01.030. Epub 2012 Mar 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Emotional Blunting in Depression in the PREDDICT Clinical Trial: Inflammation-Stratified Augmentation of Vortioxetine With Celecoxib.PREDDICT 临床试验中抑郁的情绪迟钝:塞来昔布增强文拉法辛的炎症分层作用。
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2024 Mar 1;27(3). doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyad066.
2
The Role of Vortioxetine in the Treatment of Depressive Symptoms in General Hospital Psychiatry: A Case-Series and PRISMA-Compliant Systematic Review of the Literature.伏硫西汀在综合医院精神病学中治疗抑郁症状的作用:病例系列及符合PRISMA标准的文献系统评价
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 17;13(2):531. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020531.
3
Assessing Reliability and Validity of the Oxford Depression Questionnaire (ODQ) in a Japanese Clinical Population.
评估牛津抑郁问卷(ODQ)在日本临床人群中的信度和效度。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2023 Nov 8;19:2401-2412. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S428443. eCollection 2023.