Cappello Bernadette, Moja Lorenzo, Figueras Albert, Magrini Nicola
Department of Health Products Policy and Standards, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Department of Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Toxicology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Sep 11;11:578000. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.578000. eCollection 2020.
Every two years, the World Health Organization (WHO) updates its Model List of Essential Medicines, intended as a guide for countries to adopt or adapt in accordance with local priorities and treatment guidelines, for the development of national essential medicines lists. When more than one therapeutic option is available for a given indication, the WHO Model List often includes a single medicine as representative of a group of equivalent and interchangeable medicines. The representative medicine of that group is listed with an accompanying 'square box' symbol. The intended purpose of the square box is to highlight pharmacological classes or groups of medicines for which countries, institutions and health professionals can assume homogeneous therapeutic efficacy and safety and select the most appropriate single medicine based on price, local availability, and acceptability. Though this concept of therapeutic equivalence within a therapeutic class has been endorsed by most authoritative textbooks of pharmacology since and evidence-based guidelines, marketing forces have often made claims on individual drugs to distinguish them beyond relevant differences shown by reliable evidence: this has generated the concept of "me-too drugs" with its double meaning-, market latecomers differing minimally from products preceding them and whose marketing budgets have significant opportunity costs, or medicines which may be useful to substitute for equivalent products in the event of shortages. The square box concept is applied in the context of a comprehensive list: therapeutic equivalence or interchangeability cannot always be easily established. Different interpretations have been applied to different groups of medicines over the 40+ year history of the Model List. This paper presents the concept of the square box, provides key examples and guidance on how square box listings should be practically interpreted in the development and implementation of national essential medicine lists, considers the applicability of a square box listing concept to biologic medicines and proposes that an updated review of the square box concept and listings is warranted.
世界卫生组织(WHO)每两年更新一次其基本药物示范清单,该清单旨在为各国根据当地优先事项和治疗指南采用或调整、制定国家基本药物清单提供指导。当针对某一特定适应症有多种治疗选择时,WHO示范清单通常会列出一种药物作为一组等效且可互换药物的代表。该组中的代表药物会附带一个“方盒”符号列出。方盒的预期目的是突出那些国家、机构和卫生专业人员可以认为具有同质治疗效果和安全性的药理学类别或药物组,并根据价格、当地可获得性和可接受性选择最合适的单一药物。尽管自[具体时间]以来,治疗类别内的这种治疗等效性概念已得到大多数权威药理学教科书和循证指南的认可,但市场力量常常对个别药物进行宣传,以使其区别于可靠证据所显示的相关差异:这就产生了“仿制药”的概念,它有双重含义——市场后来者与之前的产品差异极小,其营销预算有重大机会成本,或者在短缺情况下可用于替代等效产品的药物。方盒概念是在一份综合清单的背景下应用的:治疗等效性或互换性并非总能轻易确定。在示范清单40多年的历史中,对不同类别的药物有不同的解释。本文介绍了方盒的概念,提供了关键示例以及在国家基本药物清单的制定和实施过程中对方盒清单应如何实际解读的指导,考虑了方盒清单概念对生物药物的适用性,并提出有必要对方盒概念和清单进行更新审查。