D'Amore Carmen, Da Cas Roberto, Rossi Mariangela, Traversa Giuseppe
Pharmacoepidemiology Unit, National Centre for Epidemiology, National Institute of Health, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Unit for Pharmaceutical Governance, General Directorate for Health, Umbria Region, Perugia, Italy.
BioDrugs. 2016 Feb;30(1):27-32. doi: 10.1007/s40259-015-0155-0.
The acceptability of switching between reference drugs and their biosimilars is often disputed. It is unclear whether this concern is specific to the use of biosimilars or is relevant to the practice of switching between any biological drugs.
The objective of this study was to quantify the occurrence of switching between different erythropoiesis-stimulating agents.
A retrospective drug utilization study was conducted in the Umbria region (Italy). The study population included all residents who received their first epoetin prescription between 1 July 2011 and 31 December 2014. The Umbria drug prescription database and the regional archive of residents were used to gather information. Switching was defined as any transition between different epoetins (different substances and/or different products of the same substance) in a series of two prescriptions. The probability of switching was described in relationship to the duration of treatment in a survival analysis.
Overall, 3258 subjects received prescriptions of epoetins. Among the 2896 patients with at least two prescriptions, 354 (12.2%) experienced one or more switches. The probability of switching depended on the duration of treatment: approximately 15% of users switched within 12 months of observation and 25% switched within 2 years. Switching was not limited to reference and biosimilar epoetins and it affected patent and off-patent epoetins equally.
Switching between different epoetins was related to the duration of use and most episodes of switching involved epoetins that have never been contrasted in a comparability exercise. The present level of switching may provide reassurance to physicians when taken together with other sources of comparative evidence.
参比药物与其生物类似药之间换药的可接受性常常存在争议。目前尚不清楚这种担忧是否是生物类似药使用所特有的,还是与任何生物药物之间换药的做法相关。
本研究的目的是量化不同促红细胞生成剂之间换药的发生率。
在意大利翁布里亚地区进行了一项回顾性药物利用研究。研究人群包括2011年7月1日至2014年12月31日期间首次接受促红细胞生成素处方的所有居民。利用翁布里亚药物处方数据库和地区居民档案收集信息。换药定义为在一系列两张处方中不同促红细胞生成素(不同物质和/或同一物质的不同产品)之间的任何转换。在生存分析中,描述了换药概率与治疗持续时间的关系。
总体而言,3258名受试者接受了促红细胞生成素处方。在2896例至少有两张处方的患者中,354例(12.2%)经历了一次或多次换药。换药概率取决于治疗持续时间:约15%的使用者在观察的12个月内换药,25%的使用者在2年内换药。换药不仅限于参比促红细胞生成素和生物类似促红细胞生成素,专利期和专利过期的促红细胞生成素受到的影响相同。
不同促红细胞生成素之间的换药与使用持续时间有关,大多数换药事件涉及在可比性研究中从未进行过对比的促红细胞生成素。结合其他比较证据来源来看,目前的换药水平可能会让医生放心。