• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于中国的广义诊断性项目反应理论模型开发概率学习进阶

Developing a Learning Progression for Probability Based on the GDINA Model in China.

作者信息

Bai Shengnan

机构信息

School of Mathematics and Statistics, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 23;11:569852. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.569852. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.569852
PMID:33071899
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7538770/
Abstract

This research focuses on developing a learning progression of probability for middle school students, and it applies the GDINA model in cognitive diagnosis models to data analysis. GDINA model analysis firstly extracted nine cognitive attributes and constructed their attribute hierarchy and the hypothesized learning progression according to previous studies, curriculum standards, and textbooks. Then the cognitive diagnostic test was developed based on Q-matrix theory. Finally, we used the GDINA model to analyze a sample of 1624 Chinese middle school students' item response patterns to identify their attribute master patterns, verify and modify the hypothesized learning progression. The results show that, first of all, the psychometric quality of the measurement instrument is good. Secondly, the hypothesized learning progression is basically reasonable and modified according to the attribute mastery probability. The results also show that the level of probabilistic thinking of middle school students is improving steadily. However, the students in grade 8 are slightly regressive. These results demonstrate the feasibility and superiority of using cognitive diagnosis models to develop a learning progression.

摘要

本研究聚焦于为中学生开发概率学习进程,并将认知诊断模型中的GDINA模型应用于数据分析。GDINA模型分析首先根据以往研究、课程标准和教科书提取了九个认知属性,并构建了它们的属性层次结构和假设的学习进程。然后基于Q矩阵理论开发了认知诊断测试。最后,我们使用GDINA模型分析了1624名中国中学生的项目反应模式样本,以识别他们的属性掌握模式,验证并修改假设的学习进程。结果表明,首先,测量工具的心理测量质量良好。其次,假设的学习进程基本合理,并根据属性掌握概率进行了修改。结果还表明,中学生的概率思维水平在稳步提高。然而,八年级的学生略有退步。这些结果证明了使用认知诊断模型来开发学习进程的可行性和优越性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7765/7538770/4e2cf2bb1785/fpsyg-11-569852-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7765/7538770/4e2cf2bb1785/fpsyg-11-569852-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7765/7538770/4e2cf2bb1785/fpsyg-11-569852-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Developing a Learning Progression for Probability Based on the GDINA Model in China.基于中国的广义诊断性项目反应理论模型开发概率学习进阶
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 23;11:569852. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.569852. eCollection 2020.
2
First-Order Learning Models With the GDINA: Estimation With the EM Algorithm and Applications.基于GDINA的一阶学习模型:使用期望最大化算法的估计及应用
Appl Psychol Meas. 2021 May;45(3):143-158. doi: 10.1177/0146621621990746. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
3
Measuring students' learning progressions in energy using cognitive diagnostic models.使用认知诊断模型测量学生在能源方面的学习进程。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 9;13:892884. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.892884. eCollection 2022.
4
Determining the number of attributes in the GDINA model.
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2025 Feb;78(1):84-111. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12349. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
5
On Interim Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing in Learning Context.关于学习情境中的临时认知诊断计算机自适应测试
Appl Psychol Meas. 2021 Jun;45(4):235-252. doi: 10.1177/0146621621990755. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
6
Probabilistic-Input, Noisy Conjunctive Models for Cognitive Diagnosis.用于认知诊断的概率输入噪声合取模型
Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 14;9:997. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00997. eCollection 2018.
7
International comparative study of learning trajectories based on TIMSS 2019 G4 data on cognitive diagnostic models.基于2019年国际数学和科学趋势研究(TIMSS)四年级数据的认知诊断模型的学习轨迹国际比较研究。
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 27;14:1241656. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1241656. eCollection 2023.
8
[Role of the implicit theories of intelligence in learning situations].[智力的内隐理论在学习情境中的作用]
Encephale. 2004 Sep-Oct;30(5):456-63. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95460-7.
9
Cognitive Diagnostic Models With Attribute Hierarchies: Model Estimation With a Restricted Q-Matrix Design.具有属性层次结构的认知诊断模型:基于受限Q矩阵设计的模型估计
Appl Psychol Meas. 2019 Jun;43(4):255-271. doi: 10.1177/0146621618765721. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
10
The Effects of Q-Matrix Design on Classification Accuracy in the Log-Linear Cognitive Diagnosis Model.Q矩阵设计对对数线性认知诊断模型中分类准确性的影响
Educ Psychol Meas. 2015 Jun;75(3):491-511. doi: 10.1177/0013164414539162. Epub 2014 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive diagnostic analysis of mathematics key competencies based on PISA data.基于国际学生评估项目(PISA)数据的数学关键能力认知诊断分析
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 24;20(2):e0315539. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315539. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Longitudinal Learning Diagnosis: Minireview and Future Research Directions.纵向学习诊断:综述与未来研究方向
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 3;11:1185. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01185. eCollection 2020.
2
A Latent Transition Analysis Model for Assessing Change in Cognitive Skills.一种用于评估认知技能变化的潜在转变分析模型。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2016 Apr;76(2):181-204. doi: 10.1177/0013164415588946. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
3
Using the Rasch model to validate stages of understanding the energy concept.
J Appl Meas. 2005;6(2):224-41.
4
Children's ability to make probability estimates: skills revealed through application of Anderson's functional measurement methodology.
Child Dev. 1989 Aug;60(4):933-45.