• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于GDINA的一阶学习模型:使用期望最大化算法的估计及应用

First-Order Learning Models With the GDINA: Estimation With the EM Algorithm and Applications.

作者信息

Yigit Hulya D, Douglas Jeffrey A

机构信息

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA.

出版信息

Appl Psychol Meas. 2021 May;45(3):143-158. doi: 10.1177/0146621621990746. Epub 2021 Feb 15.

DOI:10.1177/0146621621990746
PMID:33958833
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8042554/
Abstract

In learning environments, understanding the longitudinal path of learning is one of the main goals. Cognitive diagnostic models (CDMs) for measurement combined with a transition model for mastery may be beneficial for providing fine-grained information about students' knowledge profiles over time. An efficient algorithm to estimate model parameters would augment the practicality of this combination. In this study, the Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm is presented for the estimation of student learning trajectories with the GDINA (generalized deterministic inputs, noisy, "and" gate) and some of its submodels for the measurement component, and a first-order Markov model for learning transitions is implemented. A simulation study is conducted to investigate the efficiency of the algorithm in estimation accuracy of student and model parameters under several factors-sample size, number of attributes, number of time points in a test, and complexity of the measurement model. Attribute- and vector-level agreement rates as well as the root mean square error rates of the model parameters are investigated. In addition, the computer run times for converging are recorded. The result shows that for a majority of the conditions, the accuracy rates of the parameters are quite promising in conjunction with relatively short computation times. Only for the conditions with relatively low sample sizes and high numbers of attributes, the computation time increases with a reduction parameter recovery rate. An application using spatial reasoning data is given. Based on the Bayesian information criterion (BIC), the model fit analysis shows that the DINA (deterministic inputs, noisy, "and" gate) model is preferable to the GDINA with these data.

摘要

在学习环境中,了解学习的纵向路径是主要目标之一。用于测量的认知诊断模型(CDM)与掌握程度的转换模型相结合,可能有助于提供有关学生知识概况随时间变化的细粒度信息。一种估计模型参数的有效算法将增强这种组合的实用性。在本研究中,提出了期望最大化(EM)算法,用于估计学生的学习轨迹,测量部分采用广义确定性输入、噪声“与”门(GDINA)及其一些子模型,学习转换采用一阶马尔可夫模型。进行了一项模拟研究,以考察该算法在样本量、属性数量、测试中的时间点数和测量模型复杂度等几个因素下估计学生和模型参数的准确性。研究了属性和向量级别的一致率以及模型参数的均方根误差率。此外,记录了收敛的计算机运行时间。结果表明,在大多数情况下,参数的准确率相当可观,且计算时间相对较短。仅在样本量相对较小且属性数量较多的情况下,计算时间会随着参数恢复率的降低而增加。给出了一个使用空间推理数据的应用示例。基于贝叶斯信息准则(BIC)的模型拟合分析表明,对于这些数据,确定性输入、噪声“与”门(DINA)模型比GDINA模型更优。

相似文献

1
First-Order Learning Models With the GDINA: Estimation With the EM Algorithm and Applications.基于GDINA的一阶学习模型:使用期望最大化算法的估计及应用
Appl Psychol Meas. 2021 May;45(3):143-158. doi: 10.1177/0146621621990746. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
2
The accuracy and consistency of mastery for each content domain using the Rasch and deterministic inputs, noisy “and” gate diagnostic classification models: a simulation study and a real-world analysis using data from the Korean Medical Licensing Examination.使用 Rasch 和确定性输入、嘈杂“与”门诊断分类模型对每个内容领域的掌握程度的准确性和一致性:一项基于韩国医师执照考试数据的模拟研究和真实世界分析。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2021;18:15. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.15. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
3
Estimating the DINA model parameters using the No-U-Turn Sampler.使用无回转采样器估计DINA模型参数。
Biom J. 2018 Mar;60(2):352-368. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201600225. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
4
Developing a Learning Progression for Probability Based on the GDINA Model in China.基于中国的广义诊断性项目反应理论模型开发概率学习进阶
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 23;11:569852. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.569852. eCollection 2020.
5
Bayesian Estimation of the DINA Q matrix.贝叶斯估计 DINA Q 矩阵。
Psychometrika. 2018 Mar;83(1):89-108. doi: 10.1007/s11336-017-9579-4. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
6
Using Penalized EM Algorithm to Infer Learning Trajectories in Latent Transition CDM.使用惩罚期望最大化算法推断潜在转变 CDM 中的学习轨迹。
Psychometrika. 2021 Mar;86(1):167-189. doi: 10.1007/s11336-020-09742-1. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
7
Research on the Cognitive Diagnosis of Chinese Listening Comprehension Ability Based on the G-DINA Model.基于G-DINA模型的汉语听力理解能力认知诊断研究
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 7;12:714568. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.714568. eCollection 2021.
8
Estimation of item parameters and examinees' mastery probability in each domain of the Korean medical licensing examination using deterministic inputs, noisy and gate(DINA) model.使用确定性输入、噪声与门(DINA)模型,对韩国医师执照考试各领域项目参数和考生掌握概率进行估计。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020;17:35. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.35. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
9
A Hidden Markov Model for Learning Trajectories in Cognitive Diagnosis With Application to Spatial Rotation Skills.一种用于认知诊断中学习轨迹的隐马尔可夫模型及其在空间旋转技能中的应用
Appl Psychol Meas. 2018 Jan;42(1):5-23. doi: 10.1177/0146621617721250. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
10
Scalable Bayesian Approach for the Dina Q-Matrix Estimation Combining Stochastic Optimization and Variational Inference.可扩展的贝叶斯方法用于结合随机优化和变分推断的 Dina Q-矩阵估计。
Psychometrika. 2023 Mar;88(1):302-331. doi: 10.1007/s11336-022-09884-4. Epub 2022 Sep 12.

本文引用的文献

1
A Hidden Markov Model for Learning Trajectories in Cognitive Diagnosis With Application to Spatial Rotation Skills.一种用于认知诊断中学习轨迹的隐马尔可夫模型及其在空间旋转技能中的应用
Appl Psychol Meas. 2018 Jan;42(1):5-23. doi: 10.1177/0146621617721250. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
2
Consistency of Cluster Analysis for Cognitive Diagnosis: The DINO Model and the DINA Model Revisited.认知诊断聚类分析的一致性:重新审视DINO模型和DINA模型
Appl Psychol Meas. 2015 Sep;39(6):465-479. doi: 10.1177/0146621615577087. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
3
Assessing Change in Latent Skills Across Time With Longitudinal Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling: An Evaluation of Model Performance.使用纵向认知诊断模型评估潜在技能随时间的变化:模型性能评估
Educ Psychol Meas. 2017 Jun;77(3):369-388. doi: 10.1177/0013164416659314. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
4
A Latent Transition Analysis Model for Assessing Change in Cognitive Skills.一种用于评估认知技能变化的潜在转变分析模型。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2016 Apr;76(2):181-204. doi: 10.1177/0013164415588946. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
5
Sequential detection of learning in cognitive diagnosis.认知诊断中学习的顺序检测
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2016 May;69(2):139-58. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12065. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
6
Statistical Analysis of -matrix Based Diagnostic Classification Models.基于矩阵的诊断分类模型的统计分析
J Am Stat Assoc. 2015;110(510):850-866. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2014.934827.
7
Measurement of psychological disorders using cognitive diagnosis models.使用认知诊断模型测量心理障碍。
Psychol Methods. 2006 Sep;11(3):287-305. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.11.3.287.