Bonham James R, Carling Rachel S, Lindner Martin, Franzson Leifur, Zetterstrom Rolf, Boemer Francois, Cerone Roberto, Eyskens Francois, Vilarinho Laura, Hougaard David M, Schielen Peter C J I
Sheffield Children's NHS FT, Sheffield, S10 2TH, UK.
South East Thames Regional Newborn Screening Laboratory, Biochemical Sciences, Viapath, Guy's & St. Thomas' NHS FT, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2018 Feb 10;4(1):8. doi: 10.3390/ijns4010008. eCollection 2018 Mar.
While the early and asymptomatic recognition of treatable conditions offered by newborn screening confers clear health benefits for the affected child, the clinical referral of patients with screen positive results can cause significant harm for some families. The use of pivalate-containing antibiotics and more recently the inclusion of neopentanoate as a component within moisturising creams used as nipple balms by nursing mothers can result in a significant number of false positive results when screening for isovaleric acidaemia (IVA) by measuring C5 acylcarnitine. A recent survey conducted within centres from nine countries indicated that this form of contamination had been or was a significant confounding factor in the detection of IVA in seven of the nine who responded. In three of these seven the prominent cause was believed to derive from the use of moisturising creams and in another three from antibiotics containing pivalate; one country reported that the cause was mixed. As a result, four of these seven centres routinely perform second tier testing to resolve C5 isobars when an initial C5 result is elevated, and a fifth is considering making this change within their national programme. The use of creams containing neopentanoate by nursing mothers and evolving patterns in the prescription of pivalate-containing antibiotics during pregnancy require those involved in the design and operation of newborn screening programmes used to detect IVA and the doctors who receive clinical referrals from these programmes to maintain an awareness of the potential impact of this form of interference on patient results.
虽然新生儿筛查能够早期且无症状地识别可治疗疾病,为患病儿童带来明显的健康益处,但将筛查结果呈阳性的患者转诊至临床可能会对一些家庭造成严重伤害。使用含新戊酸的抗生素,以及最近哺乳期母亲将含新戊酸酯的保湿霜用作乳头膏的情况,在通过检测C5酰基肉碱筛查异戊酸血症(IVA)时,可能会导致大量假阳性结果。最近在九个国家的中心进行的一项调查表明,这种污染形式在九个做出回应的国家中的七个国家,已经或仍是IVA检测中的一个重大混杂因素。在这七个国家中的三个国家,主要原因被认为是使用了保湿霜;在另外三个国家,原因是使用了含新戊酸的抗生素;一个国家报告原因是混合的。因此,这七个中心中的四个在初始C5结果升高时,会常规进行二线检测以解决C5等压线问题,还有一个中心正在考虑在其国家项目中做出这一改变。哺乳期母亲使用含新戊酸酯的乳膏以及孕期含新戊酸抗生素处方模式的变化,要求参与用于检测IVA的新生儿筛查项目设计和运作的人员以及接收这些项目临床转诊的医生,持续关注这种干扰形式对患者检测结果的潜在影响。