Wintergerst Kupper A, Eugster Erica, Andruszewski Karen, Kleyn Mary, Vanderburg Nancy, Sockalosky Joe, Menon Ram, Linard Sharon, Kingery Suzanne, Rose Susan R, Moore Julie, Gembel Gina, Gorman Lisa
Department of Pediatrics, Endocrinology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, Endocrinology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2018 Jun 17;4(2):18. doi: 10.3390/ijns4020018. eCollection 2018 Jun.
To identify the 3-year follow-up management and education patterns of primary care clinicians and pediatric endocrinologists for children diagnosed with congenital hypothyroidism (CH) through newborn screening programs, the Region 4 Midwest Genetics Collaborative, made up of seven regional states (Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Wisconsin), performed a survey study of parents and physicians caring for children identified with CH. The clinicians and parents of 409 children with CH regionally identified in 2007 were invited to participate in a voluntary survey. Responses relating to treatment, monitoring practices, educational resources, genetic counseling, and services provided/received were collected from 214 clinicians and 77 parents. In total, 99% had undergone a confirmatory test following positive newborn screening and 55% had imaging at diagnosis, but only 50% were identified as having the etiology identified. Thyroid withdrawal challenge testing was the choice method for re-evaluating thyroid function, but the approach varied. Clinician and parent responses to education and genetic counseling also differed. Clinicians report face-to-face education as the most common method, with less than 50% providing handouts to patients. Only 14% of patients were referred to a genetics counselor. Of parents reporting on their educational experience, 86% received face-to-face education from a pediatric endocrinologist and 4% received education from a genetic counselor. Only 65%, however, were satisfied with their education. These survey data suggest a lack of a standardized approach to diagnosis, follow-up, education, and genetic counseling. This collaborative effort provides insight into developing three-year follow-up, education and genetic counseling guidelines for children diagnosed with CH.
为确定通过新生儿筛查项目诊断为先天性甲状腺功能减退症(CH)的儿童的初级保健临床医生和儿科内分泌学家的3年随访管理及教育模式,由七个地区州(伊利诺伊州、印第安纳州、肯塔基州、密歇根州、明尼苏达州、俄亥俄州、威斯康星州)组成的第4区中西部遗传学协作组对照顾已确诊CH儿童的家长和医生进行了一项调查研究。邀请了2007年在该地区确诊的409名CH儿童的临床医生和家长参与一项自愿调查。从214名临床医生和77名家长那里收集了有关治疗、监测方法、教育资源、遗传咨询以及提供/接受的服务的反馈。总体而言,99%的儿童在新生儿筛查呈阳性后接受了确诊检查,55%的儿童在诊断时有影像学检查,但只有50%的儿童被确定病因已明确。甲状腺停药激发试验是重新评估甲状腺功能的首选方法,但具体方式各不相同。临床医生和家长对教育及遗传咨询的反馈也存在差异。临床医生报告称面对面教育是最常见的方法,不到50%的医生会向患者提供资料手册。只有14%的患者被转介给遗传咨询师。在报告其教育经历的家长中,86%的家长接受了儿科内分泌学家的面对面教育,4%的家长接受了遗传咨询师的教育。然而,只有65%的家长对他们接受的教育感到满意。这些调查数据表明在诊断、随访、教育和遗传咨询方面缺乏标准化方法。这项合作努力为制定针对已确诊CH儿童的三年随访、教育和遗传咨询指南提供了思路。