• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新生儿筛查家长教育材料评估

Assessment of newborn screening parent education materials.

作者信息

Arnold Connie L, Davis Terry C, Frempong Janet Ohene, Humiston Sharon G, Bocchini Anna, Kennen Estela M, Lloyd-Puryear Michele

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-Shreveport, Louisiana 71130, USA.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2006 May;117(5 Pt 2):S320-5. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2633L.

DOI:10.1542/peds.2005-2633L
PMID:16735259
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to measure the readability and user-friendliness (clarity, complexity, organization, appearance, and cultural appropriateness of materials) of parent education brochures on newborn screening.

METHODS

We studied English-language versions of the brochures that state newborn screening programs prepare and distribute. We obtained brochures from 48 states and Puerto Rico. We evaluated each brochure for readability with the Flesch reading ease formula. User-friendliness of the brochures was assessed with an instrument we created that contained 22 specific criteria grouped into 5 categories, ie, layout, illustrations, message, manageable information, and cultural appropriateness.

RESULTS

Most current newborn screening brochures should be revised to make them more readable and user-friendly for parents. Ninety-two percent of brochures were written at a reading level that is higher than the average reading level of US adults (eighth-grade level). In most brochures, the essential information for parents was buried. Although all brochures were brief and focused on the newborn screening tests being performed, 81% needed improvement in getting to the point quickly and making it easy for parents to identify what they needed to know or to do. None of the brochures scored high in all 22 criteria on the user-friendliness checklist.

CONCLUSIONS

Parent education materials about newborn screening should be revised to be easier to read and more user-friendly, by lowering the reading difficulty to eighth-grade level and focusing on issues such as layout, illustrations, message, information, and cultural appropriateness. It is important that state newborn screening programs and organizations work with parents to develop and to evaluate materials to ensure that they are user-friendly.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估新生儿筛查家长教育手册的可读性及用户友好度(材料的清晰度、复杂性、组织性、外观和文化适宜性)。

方法

我们研究了各州新生儿筛查项目编写并分发的手册英文版本。我们从48个州和波多黎各获取了手册。我们使用弗莱什易读性公式评估每本手册的可读性。手册的用户友好度通过我们创建的一个包含22项具体标准的工具进行评估,这些标准分为5类,即布局、插图、信息、可管理信息和文化适宜性。

结果

大多数现行的新生儿筛查手册应进行修订,以使其对家长而言更具可读性和用户友好度。92%的手册所针对的阅读水平高于美国成年人的平均阅读水平(八年级水平)。在大多数手册中,对家长而言的关键信息都被埋没了。尽管所有手册都很简短且聚焦于正在进行的新生儿筛查测试,但81%的手册在迅速切入重点以及让家长轻松识别他们需要了解或做的事情方面需要改进。在用户友好度清单的所有22项标准中,没有一本手册得分很高。

结论

关于新生儿筛查的家长教育材料应进行修订,通过将阅读难度降低到八年级水平并关注布局、插图、信息、信息呈现和文化适宜性等问题,使其更易于阅读且更具用户友好度。各州新生儿筛查项目和组织与家长合作开发和评估材料以确保其对用户友好非常重要。

相似文献

1
Assessment of newborn screening parent education materials.新生儿筛查家长教育材料评估
Pediatrics. 2006 May;117(5 Pt 2):S320-5. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2633L.
2
Research briefs reading grade level and readability of printed cancer education materials.研究简报:癌症印刷教育材料的阅读年级水平与可读性
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2003 Sep-Oct;30(5):867-70. doi: 10.1188/03.ONF.867-870.
3
Completeness and complexity of information available to parents from newborn-screening programs.新生儿筛查项目向家长提供的信息的完整性和复杂性。
Pediatrics. 2005 May;115(5):1268-72. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0834.
4
The readability of American Academy of Pediatrics patient education brochures.美国儿科学会患者教育手册的可读性。
J Pediatr Health Care. 2005 May-Jun;19(3):151-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2005.01.013.
5
Readability of the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry patient education materials.美国儿科学会牙科患者教育材料的可读性。
Pediatr Dent. 2007 Sep-Oct;29(5):431-5.
6
Infant hearing screening: stakeholder recommendations for parent-centered communication.婴儿听力筛查:以家长为中心沟通的利益相关者建议
Pediatrics. 2006 May;117(5 Pt 2):S341-54. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2633N.
7
Parent comprehension of polio vaccine information pamphlets.家长对脊髓灰质炎疫苗信息手册的理解。
Pediatrics. 1996 Jun;97(6 Pt 1):804-10.
8
Recommendations for effective newborn screening communication: results of focus groups with parents, providers, and experts.有效新生儿筛查沟通的建议:与家长、医护人员及专家的焦点小组讨论结果
Pediatrics. 2006 May;117(5 Pt 2):S326-40. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2633M.
9
Are end-of-life patient education materials readable?临终患者教育材料是否具有可读性?
Palliat Med. 2009 Sep;23(6):545-8. doi: 10.1177/0269216309106313. Epub 2009 May 21.
10
The use of illustrations and narrative text style to improve readability of a health education brochure.运用插图和叙事文本风格提高健康教育手册的可读性。
J Cancer Educ. 1992;7(3):251-60. doi: 10.1080/08858199209528176.

引用本文的文献

1
Health literacy characteristics of over-the-counter rapid antigen COVID-19 test materials.非处方快速抗原 COVID-19 检测材料的健康素养特征。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022 Dec;18(12):4124-4128. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.08.003. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
2
Comprehensiveness of infant formula and bottle feeding resources: A review of information from Australian healthcare organisations.婴儿配方奶粉和奶瓶喂养资源的全面性:对澳大利亚医疗机构信息的综述。
Matern Child Nutr. 2022 Apr;18(2):e13309. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13309. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
3
A Health-Literacy Intervention for Early Childhood Obesity Prevention: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.
一项针对儿童肥胖预防的健康素养干预措施:一项集群随机对照试验。
Pediatrics. 2021 May;147(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-049866.
4
Factors Influencing Parental Awareness about Newborn Screening.影响父母对新生儿筛查认知的因素。
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2019 Sep 18;5(3):35. doi: 10.3390/ijns5030035. eCollection 2019 Sep.
5
Congenital Hypothyroidism 3-Year Follow-Up Project: Region 4 Midwest Genetics Collaborative Results.先天性甲状腺功能减退症3年随访项目:中西部第4区遗传学协作组结果
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2018 Jun 17;4(2):18. doi: 10.3390/ijns4020018. eCollection 2018 Jun.
6
Supporting Parental Decisions About Genomic Sequencing for Newborn Screening: The NC NEXUS Decision Aid.支持父母关于新生儿筛查基因组测序的决策:北卡罗来纳州NEXUS决策辅助工具。
Pediatrics. 2016 Jan;137 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S16-23. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-3731E.
7
Readability and Content Characteristics of Powdered Infant Formula Instructions in the United States.美国婴儿配方奶粉粉状产品说明的可读性及内容特征
Matern Child Health J. 2016 Apr;20(4):889-94. doi: 10.1007/s10995-015-1877-9.
8
Framing optional genetic testing in the context of mandatory newborn screening tests.在强制性新生儿筛查测试的背景下构建可选的基因检测。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Jun 27;15:50. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0173-3.
9
Quality, range, and legibility in web sites related to orofacial functions.与口面部功能相关的网站的质量、范围和易读性。
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Oct;17(4):358-62. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1351372.
10
Knowledge of birth defects among nursing mothers in a developing country.发展中国家哺乳期母亲的出生缺陷知识
Afr Health Sci. 2015 Mar;15(1):180-7. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v15i1.24.