Fant Kathryn E, Clark Sarah J, Kemper Alex R
Child Health Evaluation and Research Unit, Division of General Pediatrics, University of Michigan, 6E08 300 N Ingalls Building, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0456, USA.
Pediatrics. 2005 May;115(5):1268-72. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0834.
In 2000, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Task Force on Newborn Screening published a blueprint for the future of newborn screening that included recommendations for information provided to parents about screening.
To evaluate the completeness of educational material provided by newborn-screening programs and to measure the reading level and complexity of the material.
Telephone survey of newborn-screening programs (n = 51) followed by content analysis of educational material.
All 51 programs responded (response rate: 100%); 47 of these programs made educational material available. None of the material included all elements recommended in the blueprint. Benefits of screening (98%) and how parents would be notified of results (87%) were included more often than the risks of screening (19%), possibility of a false-positive result (13%), importance of (34%) and how to respond to (28%) a positive result, and the storage and use of residual samples (11%). The median readability grade level was 10. Grade-level complexity of the material was not associated with completeness according to the AAP criteria.
Parent educational materials for newborn-screening programs do not meet the standard recommended by the AAP, and there are important variations between programs in the information provided to parents. Continuing research is needed to measure progress toward the goals outlined within the blueprint and to assess how these changes impact the care provided through newborn-screening programs.
2000年,美国儿科学会(AAP)新生儿筛查特别工作组发布了一份新生儿筛查未来蓝图,其中包括了关于向家长提供筛查信息的建议。
评估新生儿筛查项目所提供教育材料的完整性,并衡量材料的阅读水平和复杂程度。
对新生儿筛查项目进行电话调查(n = 51),随后对教育材料进行内容分析。
所有51个项目均做出回应(回应率:100%);其中47个项目提供了教育材料。没有一份材料包含蓝图中推荐的所有要素。筛查的益处(98%)以及如何向家长告知结果(87%)比筛查的风险(19%)、假阳性结果的可能性(13%)、阳性结果的重要性(34%)以及如何应对阳性结果(28%)和剩余样本的储存与使用(11%)被包含的频率更高。可读性年级中位数为10。根据AAP标准,材料的年级水平复杂程度与完整性无关。
新生儿筛查项目的家长教育材料未达到AAP推荐的标准,并且在向家长提供的信息方面各项目之间存在重要差异。需要持续开展研究以衡量朝着蓝图中所概述目标取得的进展,并评估这些变化如何影响通过新生儿筛查项目提供的护理。