Arch Suicide Res. 2022 Apr-Jun;26(2):465-480. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2020.1833799. Epub 2020 Oct 18.
While suicide prevention interventions should be informed by lived experience, there are no reviews examining involvement of lived experience (LE) thus far. This rapid review aimed to synthesize available studies using LE of suicidality to guide the development of suicide prevention interventions.
A rapid review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted. Key electronic databases were searched for the literature for the last 10 years (2010 until June 2019) to identify studies that have incorporated the lived experience of people of suicide to develop a suicide prevention intervention. Key features of the LE intervention development process were synthesized and discussed.
A final 11 studies from 13 papers were selected for synthesis. Most studies employed focus groups (73%). Research questions focused on participant preferences, experiences, and recommendations for suicide prevention interventions. Considering the qualitative nature, majority of studies used thematic analyses to study participant responses and generate intervention components based on identified themes. Translation from research findings into a physical intervention was described in limited detail across all studies. The rapid review was limited to the literature about development of interventions using LE of suicide published in English in last 10 years.
With an increased focus on person-centered care and LE in suicide prevention, such valuable expertise should be integrated into intervention development. This review provides insight into the process to ensure responses to suicidal persons are well aligned with the needs of those they serve. HighlightsLimited studies have involved lived experience in the development of interventionsFocus groups and thematic analysis are common methods to develop interventionsLimited description of translating themes into intervention components is described.
虽然预防自杀干预措施应该基于生活经验，但迄今为止，还没有审查涉及生活经验（LE）的干预措施。本快速审查旨在综合利用自杀生活经验的现有研究，以指导预防自杀干预措施的制定。
根据 PRISMA 指南进行了快速审查。检索了主要电子数据库，以获取过去 10 年（2010 年至 2019 年 6 月）的文献，以确定纳入自杀生活经验来制定预防自杀干预措施的研究。综合讨论了 LE 干预措施发展过程的关键特征。
从 13 篇论文中最终选择了 11 项研究进行综合分析。大多数研究采用焦点小组（73%）。研究问题集中在参与者的偏好、经验以及对预防自杀干预措施的建议上。考虑到定性性质，大多数研究使用主题分析来研究参与者的反应，并根据确定的主题生成干预组件。所有研究都有限地描述了如何将研究结果转化为物理干预措施。本快速审查仅限于过去 10 年以英语发表的关于使用自杀生活经验开发干预措施的文献。
随着人们更加关注以患者为中心的护理和预防自杀方面的生活经验，这种宝贵的专业知识应该融入干预措施的制定中。本综述深入了解了这一过程，以确保对自杀者的反应与他们所服务的人群的需求保持一致。
有限的研究涉及生活经验在干预措施的发展。
焦点小组和主题分析是开发干预措施的常用方法。
将主题转化为干预措施的描述有限。
