University of Michigan, Department of Psychiatry, United States.
University of California San Francisco, Department of Emergency Medicine, United States.
J Affect Disord. 2021 Jan 15;279:274-281. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.10.015. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
Differences in risk and protective factors (e.g., victimization, abuse, social support) have been used to explain elevated rates of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in sexual minority youth (SMY) relative to heterosexual peers. However, little is known regarding how risk and protective factors may explain suicide risk differences among subgroups of SMY. The aims of this study were to 1) examine differences in prevalence and severity for suicide risk and protective factors among SMY, and 2) explore whether risk and protective factors are differentially associated with suicidal ideation and suicide attempts for SMY subgroups.
Participants were 6,423 adolescents (ages 12-17) recruited from 14 Emergency Departments across the United States who completed an assessment of suicide risk and protective factors. SMY were 20% of the sample (n = 1,275) and categorized as bisexual (8%), gay/lesbian (2%), mostly straight (5%), or other sexual minority (5%).
Bisexual youth had elevated rates of suicidal ideation and attempts, more risk factors (e.g., bullying victimization, depression), and fewer protective factors (e.g., parent-family connectedness, positive affect) relative to mostly straight and other sexual minority youth. Bisexual and gay/lesbian youth only differed in parent-family connectedness (lower among bisexual youth). Depression and parent-family connectedness had weaker associations with suicidal ideation for bisexual youth.
Emergency departments were not nationally representative. Study design was cross-sectional, preventing causal inferences.
Interventions seeking to mitigate risk factors and promote protective factors are greatly needed for SMY and may benefit from tailoring to address unique stressors for sexual minority subgroups.
风险和保护因素(例如,受害、虐待、社会支持)的差异已被用于解释性少数青年(SMY)自杀意念和自杀企图的发生率相对较高,与异性恋同龄人相比。然而,对于风险和保护因素如何解释 SMY 亚组的自杀风险差异,知之甚少。本研究的目的是:1)检查 SMY 中自杀风险和保护因素的流行率和严重程度的差异,2)探讨风险和保护因素是否与 SMY 亚组的自杀意念和自杀企图存在差异关联。
参与者是来自美国 14 家急诊室的 6423 名青少年(年龄 12-17 岁),他们完成了自杀风险和保护因素的评估。SMY 占样本的 20%(n=1275),分为双性恋(8%)、同性恋/女同性恋(2%)、主要异性恋(5%)或其他性少数群体(5%)。
与主要异性恋和其他性少数群体的青年相比,双性恋青年的自杀意念和企图发生率更高,风险因素更多(例如,欺凌受害,抑郁),保护因素更少(例如,父母家庭关系,积极情绪)。双性恋和同性恋/女同性恋青年仅在父母家庭关系方面存在差异(双性恋青年较低)。抑郁和父母家庭关系与双性恋青年的自杀意念关联较弱。
急诊室没有全国代表性。研究设计是横断面的,无法进行因果推断。
需要为 SMY 提供大量干预措施,以减轻风险因素并促进保护因素,并且可能需要针对特定的性少数亚组的独特压力源进行定制。