Suppr超能文献

终末期 Medicare 受益人群的无创和有创机械通气趋势。

Trends in Noninvasive and Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Among Medicare Beneficiaries at the End of Life.

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland.

Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, Veterans Affairs Portland Healthcare System, Portland, Oregon.

出版信息

JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Jan 1;181(1):93-102. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.5640.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

End-of-life care is costly, and decedents often experience overtreatment or low-quality care. Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) may be a palliative approach to avoid invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) among select patients who are hospitalized at the end of life.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the trends in NIV and IMV use among decedents with a hospitalization in the last 30 days of life.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This population-based cohort study used a 20% random sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries who had an acute care hospitalization in the last 30 days of life and died between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2017. Sociodemographic, diagnosis, and comorbidity data were obtained from Medicare claims data. Data analysis was performed from September 2019 to July 2020.

EXPOSURES

Use of NIV or IMV.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Validated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification or International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification procedure codes were reviewed to identify use of NIV, IMV, both NIV and IMV, or none. Four subcohorts of Medicare beneficiaries were identified using primary admitting diagnosis codes (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], congested heart failure [CHF], cancer, and dementia). Measures of end-of-life care included in-hospital death (acute care setting), hospice enrollment at death, and hospice enrollment in the last 3 days of life. Random-effects logistic regression examined NIV and IMV use adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics, admitting diagnosis, and comorbidities.

RESULTS

A total of 2 470 435 Medicare beneficiaries (1 353 798 women [54.8%]; mean [SD] age, 82.2 [8.2] years) were hospitalized within 30 days of death. Compared with 2000, the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for the increase in NIV use was 2.63 (95% CI, 2.46-2.82; % receipt: 0.8% vs 2.0%) for 2005 and 11.84 (95% CI, 11.11-12.61; % receipt: 0.8% vs 7.1%) for 2017. Compared with 2000, the AOR for the increase in IMV use was 1.04 (95% CI, 1.02-1.06; % receipt: 15.0% vs 15.2%) for 2005 and 1.63 (95% CI, 1.59-1.66; % receipt: 15.0% vs 18.2%) for 2017. In subanalyses comparing 2017 with 2000, similar trends found increased NIV among patients with CHF (% receipt: 1.4% vs 14.2%; AOR, 14.14 [95% CI, 11.77-16.98]) and COPD (% receipt: 2.7% vs 14.5%; AOR, 8.22 [95% CI, 6.42-10.52]), with reciprocal stabilization in IMV use among patients with CHF (% receipt: 11.1% vs 7.8%; AOR, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.95-1.19]) and COPD (% receipt: 17.4% vs 13.2%; AOR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.88-1.21]). The AOR for increased NIV use was 10.82 (95% CI, 8.16-14.34; % receipt: 0.4% vs 3.5%) among decedents with cancer and 9.62 (95% CI, 7.61-12.15; % receipt: 0.6% vs 5.2%) among decedents with dementia. The AOR for increased IMV use was 1.40 (95% CI, 1.26-1.55; % receipt: 6.2% vs 7.6%) among decedents with cancer and 1.28 (95% CI, 1.17-1.41; % receipt: 5.7% vs 6.2%) among decedents with dementia. Among decedents with NIV vs IMV use, lower rates of in-hospital death (50.3% [95% CI, 49.3%-51.3%] vs 76.7% [95% CI, 75.9%-77.5%]) and hospice enrollment in the last 3 days of life (57.7% [95% CI, 56.2%-59.3%] vs 63.0% [95% CI, 60.9%-65.1%]) were observed along with higher rates of hospice enrollment (41.3% [95% CI, 40.4%-42.3%] vs 20.0% [95% CI, 19.2%-20.7%]).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study found that the use of NIV rapidly increased from 2000 through 2017 among Medicare beneficiaries at the end of life, especially among persons with cancer and dementia. The findings suggest that trials to evaluate the outcomes of NIV are warranted to inform discussions about the goals of this therapy between clinicians and patients and their health care proxies.

摘要

重要性

临终关怀费用高昂,且逝者往往经历过度治疗或低质量的护理。在生命末期选择合适的患者中,非侵入性通气(NIV)可能是避免有创机械通气(IMV)的姑息治疗方法。

目的

研究在生命最后 30 天内住院的患者中,NIV 和 IMV 使用的趋势。

设计、地点和参与者:本基于人群的队列研究使用了 Medicare 按服务付费受益人的 20%随机样本,这些受益人在生命最后 30 天内有急性住院治疗,并于 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日期间死亡。从 Medicare 索赔数据中获得了人口统计学、诊断和合并症数据。数据分析于 2019 年 9 月至 2020 年 7 月进行。

暴露

NIV 或 IMV 的使用。

主要结果和措施

使用经过验证的国际疾病分类,第九版临床修订版或国际疾病分类,第十版临床修订版程序代码来识别 NIV、IMV、NIV 和 IMV 两者或均未使用。使用主要入院诊断代码(慢性阻塞性肺疾病[COPD]、充血性心力衰竭[CHF]、癌症和痴呆)确定了 Medicare 受益人的四个亚组。临终关怀措施包括院内死亡(急性护理环境)、死亡时的临终关怀登记和临终关怀登记的最后 3 天。使用随机效应逻辑回归检查了调整人口统计学特征、入院诊断和合并症后的 NIV 和 IMV 使用。

结果

共有 2470435 名 Medicare 受益人(1353798 名女性[54.8%];平均[SD]年龄,82.2[8.2]岁)在死亡后 30 天内住院。与 2000 年相比,2005 年 NIV 使用增加的调整优势比(AOR)为 2.63(95%置信区间,2.46-2.82;%接受者:0.8%比 2.0%),2017 年为 11.84(95%置信区间,11.11-12.61;%接受者:0.8%比 7.1%)。与 2000 年相比,2005 年 IMV 使用增加的 AOR 为 1.04(95%置信区间,1.02-1.06;%接受者:15.0%比 15.2%),2017 年为 1.63(95%置信区间,1.59-1.66;%接受者:15.0%比 18.2%)。在 2017 年与 2000 年比较的亚组分析中,发现心力衰竭(%接受者:1.4%比 14.2%;AOR,14.14[95%置信区间,11.77-16.98])和 COPD(%接受者:2.7%比 14.5%;AOR,8.22[95%置信区间,6.42-10.52])患者中 NIV 的使用增加,而心力衰竭(%接受者:11.1%比 7.8%;AOR,1.07[95%置信区间,0.95-1.19])和 COPD(%接受者:17.4%比 13.2%;AOR,1.03[95%置信区间,0.88-1.21])患者中 IMV 的使用稳定。癌症(%接受者:0.4%比 3.5%;AOR,10.82[95%置信区间,8.16-14.34])和痴呆(%接受者:0.6%比 5.2%;AOR,9.62[95%置信区间,7.61-12.15])患者中 NIV 使用增加的 AOR 分别为 10.82(95%置信区间,8.16-14.34)和 9.62(95%置信区间,7.61-12.15)。癌症(%接受者:6.2%比 7.6%;AOR,1.40[95%置信区间,1.26-1.55])和痴呆(%接受者:5.7%比 6.2%;AOR,1.28[95%置信区间,1.17-1.41])患者中 IMV 使用增加的 AOR 分别为 1.40(95%置信区间,1.26-1.55)和 1.28(95%置信区间,1.17-1.41)。与 IMV 相比,接受 NIV 的患者的院内死亡率(50.3%[95%置信区间,49.3%-51.3%]比 76.7%[95%置信区间,75.9%-77.5%])和临终关怀登记的最后 3 天(57.7%[95%置信区间,56.2%-59.3%]比 63.0%[95%置信区间,60.9%-65.1%])较低,而临终关怀登记(41.3%[95%置信区间,40.4%-42.3%]比 20.0%[95%置信区间,19.2%-20.7%])较高。

结论和相关性

本研究发现,NIV 在生命末期的 Medicare 受益人中的使用从 2000 年到 2017 年迅速增加,尤其是在癌症和痴呆患者中。研究结果表明,需要开展 NIV 效果的试验,为临床医生和患者及其医疗保健代理人之间关于该疗法目标的讨论提供信息。

相似文献

1
Trends in Noninvasive and Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Among Medicare Beneficiaries at the End of Life.
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Jan 1;181(1):93-102. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.5640.
2
Asian American Medicare Beneficiaries Disproportionately Receive Invasive Mechanical Ventilation When Hospitalized at the End-of-Life.
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Mar;37(4):737-744. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06794-6. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
3
4
End-of-Life Health Care Service Use and Cost Among Medicare Decedents With Neurodegenerative Diseases.
Neurology. 2024 Nov 12;103(9):e209925. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209925. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
8
Sociodemographic and Geographic Disparities in End-of-Life Health Care Intensity Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Parkinson Disease.
Neurol Clin Pract. 2023 Aug;13(4):e200171. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200171. Epub 2023 May 25.
9
Evaluation of Racial Disparities in Hospice Use and End-of-Life Treatment Intensity in the REGARDS Cohort.
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2014639. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.14639.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-Invasive Ventilation: When, Where, How to Start, and How to Stop.
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 16;14(14):5033. doi: 10.3390/jcm14145033.
3
Home Health Care and Place of Death in Medicare Beneficiaries With and Without Dementia.
Gerontologist. 2024 Nov 1;64(11). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnae131.
4
Case Definition for Diagnosed Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias in Medicare.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2427610. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.27610.
5
Trends in use of intensive care during hospitalizations at the end-of-life among older adults with advanced cancer.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Dec;72(12):3840-3848. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19119. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
6
Promoting serious illness conversations in primary care through telehealth among persons living with cognitive impairment.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Oct;72(10):3022-3034. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19100. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
7
Factors Associated With Quality-of-Dying-and-Death Classes Among Critically Ill Patients.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2420388. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.20388.
8
Mechanical Ventilation in Older Adults With Dementia: Opportunities to Promote Goal-Concordant Care.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 Aug;68(2):142-152.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.04.021. Epub 2024 Apr 27.
9
Factors Associated with Costly Hospital Care among Patients with Dementia and Acute Respiratory Failure.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2024 Jun;21(6):907-915. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202308-694OC.

本文引用的文献

2
Waste in the US Health Care System: Estimated Costs and Potential for Savings.
JAMA. 2019 Oct 15;322(15):1501-1509. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.13978.
4
Assessment of Strategies for Managing Expansion of Diagnosis Coding Using Risk-Adjustment Methods for Medicare Data.
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Sep 1;179(9):1287-1290. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.1005.
5
Association Between Medicare Policy Reforms and Changes in Hospitalized Medicare Beneficiaries' Severity of Illness.
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e193290. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.3290.
6
Rates of Mechanical Ventilation for Patients With Dementia in Ontario: A Population-Based Cohort Study.
Anesth Analg. 2019 Oct;129(4):e122-e125. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004003.
7
Outcome of invasive mechanical ventilation in cancer patients: Intubate or not to intubate a patient with cancer.
J Crit Care. 2019 Apr;50:87-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.11.014. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
10
Consensus statement for cancer patients requiring intensive care support.
Ann Hematol. 2018 Jul;97(7):1271-1282. doi: 10.1007/s00277-018-3312-y. Epub 2018 Apr 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验