• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过远程医疗在认知障碍患者的初级保健中促进重病对话。

Promoting serious illness conversations in primary care through telehealth among persons living with cognitive impairment.

机构信息

Section of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.

Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Implementation Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Oct;72(10):3022-3034. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19100. Epub 2024 Jul 23.

DOI:10.1111/jgs.19100
PMID:39041185
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11461126/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

serious illness conversations (SIC), particularly for persons living with cognitive impairment (PLCI), inconsistently happen in primary care. Pragmatic, scalable strategies are needed to promote SIC for PLCI.

DESIGN

Pragmatic, prospective single-arm pilot study that occurred between July 1, 2021 and May 30, 2022 across seven primary care practices in North Carolina.

PARTICIPANTS

Community-dwelling patients aged 65 and older with known or probable mild cognitive impairment or dementia (with decision-making capacity) and their care partners (if available).

INTERVENTION

SIC telehealth intervention (TeleVoice) via video or telephone to assist PLCI in discussing their current goals, values, and future medical preferences, while facilitating documentation within the EHR.

MAIN OUTCOMES

Main feasibility outcomes included reach/enrollment, intervention completion, and adoption rates at the clinic and provider level. Primary effectiveness outcomes included SIC documentation and quality within the EHR and usage of advance care planning billing (ACP) codes.

RESULTS

Of the 163 eligible PLCI approached, 107 (66%) enrolled (mean age 83.7 years, 68.2% female, 16.8% Black, 22% living in a geographic area of high socioeconomic disadvantage) and 81 (76%) completed the SIC telehealth intervention; 45 care partners agreed to participate (mean age 71.5 years, 80% female). Adoption at clinic level was 50%, while 75% of providers within these clinics participated. Among PLCI that completed the intervention, SIC documentation and usage of ACP billing codes was 100% and 96%, respectively, with 96% (n = 78) having high-quality SIC documentation. No significant differences were observed between telephone and video visits.

CONCLUSION

These findings provide preliminary evidence to support the feasibility of conducting SICs through telehealth to specifically meet the needs of community-dwelling PLCI. Further investigation of the sustainability of the intervention and its long-term impact on patient and caregiver outcomes is needed.

摘要

背景

严重疾病对话(SIC),特别是对于认知障碍(PLCI)患者,在初级保健中不一致地发生。需要实用且可扩展的策略来促进 PLCI 的 SIC。

设计

2021 年 7 月 1 日至 2022 年 5 月 30 日,在北卡罗来纳州的 7 个初级保健实践中进行了实用的前瞻性单臂试点研究。

参与者

社区居住的 65 岁及以上的患者,患有已知或可能的轻度认知障碍或痴呆症(有决策能力)及其护理伙伴(如果有)。

干预措施

通过视频或电话进行 SIC 远程医疗干预(TeleVoice),以帮助 PLCI 讨论其当前的目标、价值观和未来的医疗偏好,同时促进 EHR 中的文档记录。

主要结果

主要可行性结果包括覆盖面/入组、干预完成率和诊所及提供者层面的采用率。主要有效性结果包括 EHR 中的 SIC 文档记录和质量以及使用预先护理计划计费(ACP)代码。

结果

在 163 名符合条件的 PLCI 中,有 107 名(66%)入组(平均年龄 83.7 岁,68.2%为女性,16.8%为黑人,22%生活在社会经济劣势较高的地区),81 名(76%)完成了 SIC 远程医疗干预;45 名护理伙伴同意参与(平均年龄 71.5 岁,80%为女性)。诊所层面的采用率为 50%,而这些诊所的 75%的提供者参与了研究。在完成干预的 PLCI 中,SIC 文档记录和 ACP 计费代码的使用率分别为 100%和 96%,96%(n=78)的 SIC 文档记录质量较高。电话和视频访问之间没有观察到显著差异。

结论

这些发现提供了初步证据,支持通过远程医疗进行 SIC 的可行性,特别是满足社区居住的 PLCI 的需求。需要进一步研究该干预措施的可持续性及其对患者和护理人员结局的长期影响。

相似文献

1
Promoting serious illness conversations in primary care through telehealth among persons living with cognitive impairment.通过远程医疗在认知障碍患者的初级保健中促进重病对话。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Oct;72(10):3022-3034. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19100. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
2
Serious Illness Conversations in the Emergency Department for Older Adults With Advanced Illnesses: A Randomized Clinical Trial.针对患有晚期疾病的老年人在急诊科进行的重病谈话:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2516582. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.16582.
3
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
4
Engaging English- and Spanish-speaking older adults with and without possible cognitive impairment in advance care planning group visits: Protocol for the ENgaging in Advance Care Planning Talks (ENACT) Randomized Controlled Trial.让有或无可能存在认知障碍的讲英语和西班牙语的老年人参与预先护理计划小组访视:参与预先护理计划谈话(ENACT)随机对照试验方案。
Res Sq. 2025 Jun 20:rs.3.rs-6560971. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6560971/v1.
5
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
6
Telehealth interventions: remote monitoring and consultations for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).远程医疗干预:针对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的远程监测和咨询。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 20;7(7):CD013196. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013196.pub2.
7
Pharmacist-led telehealth deprescribing for people living with dementia and polypharmacy in primary care: A pilot study.药剂师主导的远程医疗减药用于初级保健中患有痴呆症和多种药物治疗的人群:一项试点研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Jul;72(7):1973-1984. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18867. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
8
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
9
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
10
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital Decision Aids to Support Decision-Making in Palliative and End-of-Life Dementia Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.支持姑息治疗和临终痴呆症护理决策的数字决策辅助工具:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 23;27:e71479. doi: 10.2196/71479.
2
External validation of a proprietary risk model for 1-year mortality in community-dwelling adults aged 65 years or older.针对65岁及以上社区居住成年人1年死亡率的专有风险模型的外部验证。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 Jul 1;32(7):1110-1119. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaf062.

本文引用的文献

1
Experiences and perspectives on the optimal timing for initiating advance care planning in patients with mild to moderate dementia: A meta-synthesis.轻度至中度痴呆患者启动预先医疗照护计划的最佳时机的经验和观点:一项荟萃分析。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2024 Jun;154:104762. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104762. Epub 2024 Mar 23.
2
Barriers to Advance Care Planning in Older Adults With Dementia, Their Families and Healthcare Professionals: An Umbrella Review of Qualitative Evidence.痴呆症老年患者、其家人及医护人员在进行预先护理计划时面临的障碍:定性证据的综合评价
Res Aging. 2024 May-Jun;46(5-6):339-358. doi: 10.1177/01640275241227909. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
3
What Clinicians and Researchers Should Know About the Evolving Field of Advance Care Planning: a Narrative Review.临床医生和研究人员应该了解的不断发展的预先医疗照护计划领域:叙事性综述。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Mar;39(4):652-660. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08579-5. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
4
Consensus definition of advance care planning in dementia: A 33-country Delphi study.痴呆症预先医疗照护计划的共识定义:33 个国家的德尔菲研究。
Alzheimers Dement. 2024 Feb;20(2):1309-1320. doi: 10.1002/alz.13526. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
5
Advanced care planning in the early phase of COVID-19: a rapid review of the practice and policy lessons learned.2019冠状病毒病早期的高级护理计划:对实践和政策经验教训的快速回顾。
Front Health Serv. 2023 Sep 15;3:1242413. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1242413. eCollection 2023.
6
Adapting the Serious Illness Conversation Guide for Dementia Care.适应于痴呆症护理的严重疾病对话指南。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 Aug;41(8):942-951. doi: 10.1177/10499091231200214. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
7
Prevalence of Alzheimer's disease dementia in the 50 US states and 3142 counties: A population estimate using the 2020 bridged-race postcensal from the National Center for Health Statistics.美国 50 个州和 3142 个县的阿尔茨海默病痴呆患病率:利用国家卫生统计中心 2020 年 bridged-race 人口普查后数据进行的人群估计。
Alzheimers Dement. 2023 Oct;19(10):4388-4395. doi: 10.1002/alz.13081. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
8
The Use of Telehealth Among People Living With Dementia-Caregiver Dyads During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,痴呆症患者-照护者对使用远程医疗的情况:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 25;25:e45045. doi: 10.2196/45045.
9
Patient Characteristics Associated With Being Offered or Choosing Telephone vs Video Virtual Visits Among Medicare Beneficiaries.与 Medicare 受益人接受或选择电话与视频虚拟就诊相关的患者特征。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e235242. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.5242.
10
Telehealth Palliative Care in Nursing Homes: A Scoping Review.养老院中的远程姑息治疗:范围综述。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023 Mar;24(3):356-367.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.01.004. Epub 2023 Feb 6.