Suppr超能文献

晚期癌症老年患者临终住院期间重症监护使用情况的趋势

Trends in use of intensive care during hospitalizations at the end-of-life among older adults with advanced cancer.

作者信息

Jain Snigdha, Long Jessica B, Rao Vinay, Law Anica C, Walkey Allan J, Prsic Elizabeth, Lindenauer Peter K, Krumholz Harlan M, Gross Cary P

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy and Effectiveness Research Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Dec;72(12):3840-3848. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19119. Epub 2024 Aug 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

High-intensity end-of-life (EOL) care, marked by admission to intensive care units (ICUs) or in-hospital death, can be costly and burdensome. Recent trends in use of ICUs, life-sustaining treatments (LSTs), and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) during EOL hospitalizations among older adults with advanced cancer and patterns of in-hospital death are unknown.

METHODS

We used SEER-Medicare data (2003-2017) to identify beneficiaries with advanced solid cancer (summary stage 7) who died within 3 years of diagnosis. We identified EOL hospitalizations (within 30 days of death), classifying them by increasing intensity of care into: (1) without ICU; (2) with ICU but without LST (invasive mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy, gastrostomy, acute dialysis) or NIV; (3) with ICU and NIV but without LST; and (4) with ICU and LST use. We constructed a multinomial regression model to evaluate trends in risk-adjusted hospitalization, overall and across hospitalization categories, adjusting for sociodemographics, cancer characteristics, comorbidities, and frailty. We evaluated trends in in-hospital death across categories.

RESULTS

Of 226,263 Medicare beneficiaries with advanced cancer, 138,305 (61.1%) were hospitalized at EOL [Age, Mean (SD):77.9(7.1) years; 45.5% female]. Overall, EOL hospitalizations remained high throughout, from 78.1% (95% CI: 77.4, 78.7) in 2004 to 75.5% (95% CI: 74.5, 76.2) in 2017. Hospitalizations without ICU use decreased from 49.3% (95% CI: 48.5, 50.2) to 35.0% (95% CI: 34.2, 35.9) while hospitalizations with more intensive care increased, from 23.7% (95% CI: 23.0, 24.4) to 28.7% (95% CI: 27.9, 29.5) for ICU without LST or NIV, 0.8% (95% CI: 0.6, 0.9) to 3.8% (95% CI: 3.4, 4.1) for ICU with NIV but without LST, and 4.3% (95% CI: 4.0, 4.7) to 8.0% (95% CI: 7.5, 8.5) for ICU with LST use. Among those who experienced in-hospital death, the proportion receiving ICU care increased from 46.5% to 65.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

Among older adults with advanced cancer, EOL hospitalization rates remained stable from 2004-2017. However, intensity of care during EOL hospitalizations increased as evidenced by increasing use of ICUs, LSTs, and NIV.

摘要

背景

以入住重症监护病房(ICU)或院内死亡为特征的高强度临终关怀可能成本高昂且负担沉重。在患有晚期癌症的老年人临终住院期间,ICU、维持生命治疗(LST)和无创通气(NIV)的使用趋势以及院内死亡模式尚不清楚。

方法

我们使用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)医保数据(2003 - 2017年)来确定诊断后3年内死亡的晚期实体癌(总结分期7期)受益患者。我们确定了临终住院(死亡前30天内),并根据护理强度增加将其分类为:(1)未入住ICU;(2)入住ICU但未接受LST(有创机械通气、气管切开术、胃造口术、急性透析)或NIV;(3)入住ICU且接受NIV但未接受LST;以及(4)入住ICU且使用LST。我们构建了一个多项回归模型,以评估风险调整后的住院趋势,包括总体趋势以及各住院类别趋势,并对社会人口统计学、癌症特征、合并症和虚弱情况进行了调整。我们评估了各类别中的院内死亡趋势。

结果

在226,263名患有晚期癌症的医保受益患者中,138,305名(61.1%)在临终时住院[年龄,均值(标准差):77.9(7.1)岁;45.5%为女性]。总体而言,临终住院率一直居高不下,从2004年的78.1%(95%置信区间:77.4, 78.7)降至2017年的75.5%(95%置信区间:74.5, 76.2)。未使用ICU的住院比例从49.3%(95%置信区间:48.5, 50.2)降至35.0%(95%置信区间:34.2, 35.9),而接受更强化护理的住院比例增加,未使用LST或NIV的ICU住院比例从23.7%(95%置信区间:23.0, 24.4)增至28.7%(95%置信区间:27.9, 29.5),使用NIV但未使用LST的ICU住院比例从0.8%(95%置信区间:0.6, 0.9)增至3.8%(95%置信区间:3.4, 4.1),使用LST的ICU住院比例从4.3%(95%置信区间:4.0, 4.7)增至8.0%(95%置信区间:7.5, 8.5)。在院内死亡的患者中,接受ICU护理的比例从46.5%增至65.0%。

结论

在患有晚期癌症的老年人中,2004 - 2017年临终住院率保持稳定。然而,临终住院期间的护理强度增加,这表现为ICU、LST和NIV的使用增加。

相似文献

5
Hospital end-of-life treatment intensity among cancer and non-cancer cohorts.癌症和非癌症患者群体中的医院临终治疗强度。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Mar;49(3):521-9.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.06.017. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
10
Trends in end-of-life cancer care in the Medicare program.医疗保险计划中临终癌症护理的趋势。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2016 Mar;7(2):116-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2015.11.007. Epub 2016 Jan 15.

本文引用的文献

7
The Quality of End-of-Life Care among ICU versus Ward Decedents.ICU 与非 ICU 临终患者的临终关怀质量比较。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Apr 1;201(7):832-839. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201907-1423OC.
10
Understanding irresponsible use of intensive care unit resources in the USA.了解美国重症监护病房资源的滥用情况。
Lancet Respir Med. 2019 Jul;7(7):605-612. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30088-8. Epub 2019 May 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验