A circular mapping catheter is not mandatory for isolating pulmonary veins during paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation with radiofrequency.

PURPOSE

In this study, we evaluated the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of radiofrequency ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) with the use of an ablation catheter only (non-CMC group) by retrospectively comparing its procedural success and recurrence rates at 1 year to ablation performed with the help of a circular mapping catheter (CMC group).

METHODS

We compared the success and recurrence rates between 226 patients and 251 patients who underwent index ablation with and without the use of CMC, respectively.

RESULTS

Freedom from recurrence was defined as a 1-year absence of AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) episodes > 30 s, beyond the 3-month blanking period. There was no significant difference between the number of pulmonary vein isolations, recurrence rate of AF/AT, and the use of antiarrhythmic drugs after 1 year of ablation. The procedure and fluoroscopy times were lower in the non-CMC group compared with the CMC group (106 ± 33 vs. 125 ± 32 min, p < 0.0001; 2.2 ± 1.9 vs. 2.7 ± 2.3 min, p = 0.0002, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Pulmonary vein isolation without the use of a CMC is feasible; moreover, the material costs, procedure time, and radiation exposure were reduced compared with the CMC group. Freedom of recurrence was similar between groups. Optimized use of 3D electro-anatomical mapping systems could reduce the radiation exposure for both the patient and physician.