Vollmann Dirk, Lüthje Lars, Seegers Joachim, Sohns Christian, Sossalla Samuel, Sohns Jan, Röver Christian, Hasenfuß Gerd, Zabel Markus
Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany,
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014 Oct;41(1):65-73. doi: 10.1007/s10840-014-9912-0. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
Remote magnetic navigation (RMN) is utilized for catheter guidance during pulmonary vein ablation (PVA). We aimed to determine whether the additional use of a circular mapping catheter (CMC) influences efficacy and outcome of RMN-guided PVA.
A total of 80 consecutive subjects (65 % male, age 62 ± 9 years) underwent circumferential PVA with a 3D mapping system and an RMN-guided irrigated catheter. Procedural endpoint was complete PV isolation (PVI), total radiofrequency (RF) time >60 min, or procedure duration >5 h. PVI was defined as an entrance and/or exit block, diagnosed with a CMC within the PV ostium or by pacing via the roving RMN-guided catheter (single-catheter technique). Prolonged Holter monitoring after 3 and 6 months was used to detect atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT/AF) recurrences.
Complete PVI was achieved in 56 % (45/80) of all subjects (isolated PVs per patient, 3.1 ± 1.2; RF time, 56.3 ± 17.2 min; procedure duration, 3.8 ± 0.8 h). Prospective validation of the single-catheter technique for diagnosing PVI demonstrated high concordance (94 %) with blinded CMC results. CMC use in first-time PVA was associated with similar total RF and procedure times but higher PV isolation rate. Upon multivariate analysis, CMC use, female gender, left PV, smaller PV ostium and repeat PVA predicted PVI during RMN-guided ablation. Persistent AF and mitral regurgitation at baseline and the number of non-isolated PVs predicted AT/AF recurrence during follow-up.
Concomitant CMC use for first-time, RMN-guided PVA is associated with similar procedure duration but higher PV isolation rates as compared to a single-catheter approach. Since the number of isolated PVs predicts freedom from AT/AF, CMC utilization appears advisable for first-time, RMN-guided PVA.
在肺静脉消融(PVA)过程中,远程磁导航(RMN)用于导管引导。我们旨在确定额外使用环形标测导管(CMC)是否会影响RMN引导下PVA的疗效和结果。
共有80例连续受试者(65%为男性,年龄62±9岁)接受了使用三维标测系统和RMN引导的灌注导管进行的环周PVA。手术终点为肺静脉完全隔离(PVI)、总射频(RF)时间>60分钟或手术持续时间>5小时。PVI定义为入口和/或出口阻滞,通过PV口内的CMC或通过移动的RMN引导导管起搏来诊断(单导管技术)。在3个月和6个月后进行延长的动态心电图监测以检测房性快速性心律失常(AT/AF)复发。
所有受试者中有56%(45/80)实现了完全PVI(每位患者隔离的肺静脉,3.1±1.2;RF时间,56.3±17.2分钟;手术持续时间,3.8±0.8小时)。单导管技术诊断PVI的前瞻性验证显示与盲法CMC结果高度一致(94%)。在首次PVA中使用CMC与总RF时间和手术时间相似,但肺静脉隔离率更高。多因素分析显示,在RMN引导下的消融过程中,使用CMC、女性、左肺静脉、较小的肺静脉口和再次进行PVA可预测PVI。基线时的持续性房颤和二尖瓣反流以及未隔离的肺静脉数量可预测随访期间的AT/AF复发。
与单导管方法相比,在首次RMN引导下的PVA中同时使用CMC,手术持续时间相似,但肺静脉隔离率更高。由于隔离的肺静脉数量可预测无AT/AF,因此在首次RMN引导下的PVA中使用CMC似乎是可取的。