Human Vascular Physiology Laboratory, Department of Physiology and Anatomy, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas.
Department of Surgery, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas.
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2020 Dec 1;319(6):R666-R672. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00257.2020. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
Endoplasmic reticulum stress contributes to ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury in rodent and cell models. However, the contribution of endoplasmic reticulum stress in the pathogenesis of endothelial I/R injury in humans is unknown. We tested the hypothesis that compared with placebo, inhibition of endoplasmic reticulum stress via ingestion of tauroursodeoxycholic acid would prevent the attenuation of endothelium-dependent vasodilation following I/R injury. Twelve young adults (6 women) were studied following ingestion of a placebo or 1,500 mg tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA). Endothelium-dependent vasodilation was assessed via brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (duplex ultrasonography) before and after I/R injury, which was induced by 20 min of arm ischemia followed by 20 min of reperfusion. Endothelium-independent vasodilation (glyceryl trinitrate-mediated vasodilation) was also assessed after I/R injury. Compared with placebo, TUDCA ingestion increased circulating plasma concentrations by 145 ± 90 ng/ml and increased concentrations of the taurine unconjugated form, ursodeoxycholic acid, by 560 ± 156 ng/ml (both < 0.01). Ischemia-reperfusion injury attenuated endothelium-dependent vasodilation, an effect that did not differ between placebo (pre-I/R, 5.0 ± 2.1% vs. post-I/R, 3.5 ± 2.2%) and TUDCA (pre-I/R, 5.6 ± 2.1% vs. post-I/R, 3.9 ± 2.1%; = 0.8) conditions. Similarly, endothelium-independent vasodilation did not differ between conditions (placebo, 19.6 ± 4.8% vs. TUDCA, 19.7 ± 6.1%; = 0.9). Taken together, endoplasmic reticulum stress does not appear to contribute to endothelial I/R injury in healthy young adults.
内质网应激有助于啮齿动物和细胞模型中的缺血再灌注 (I/R) 损伤。然而,内质网应激在人类内皮 I/R 损伤发病机制中的贡献尚不清楚。我们检验了这样一个假设,即与安慰剂相比,通过摄入牛磺熊脱氧胆酸来抑制内质网应激会防止 I/R 损伤后内皮依赖性血管舒张的减弱。12 名年轻成年人(6 名女性)在摄入安慰剂或 1500 毫克牛磺熊脱氧胆酸 (TUDCA) 后进行了研究。通过肱动脉血流介导的扩张(双功能超声)在 I/R 损伤前后评估内皮依赖性血管舒张,I/R 损伤通过 20 分钟的手臂缺血和随后的 20 分钟再灌注来诱导。在 I/R 损伤后也评估了内皮非依赖性血管舒张(硝酸甘油介导的血管舒张)。与安慰剂相比,TUDCA 摄入使循环血浆浓度增加 145±90ng/ml,并使牛磺酸未结合形式的熊去氧胆酸浓度增加 560±156ng/ml(均 <0.01)。I/R 损伤减弱了内皮依赖性血管舒张,这种作用在安慰剂(预 I/R,5.0±2.1%vs. 后 I/R,3.5±2.2%)和 TUDCA(预 I/R,5.6±2.1%vs. 后 I/R,3.9±2.1%)条件之间没有差异。同样,内皮非依赖性血管舒张在两种情况下也没有差异(安慰剂,19.6±4.8%vs.TUDCA,19.7±6.1%;=0.9)。综上所述,内质网应激似乎不会导致健康年轻成年人的内皮 I/R 损伤。