• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Consolidation of Cancer Registry and Administrative Claims Data on Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment in the US Military Health System.美国军人健康系统中癌症诊断和治疗的癌症登记和行政索赔数据的整合。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2020 Oct;4:906-917. doi: 10.1200/CCI.20.00043.
2
MilCanEpi: Increased Capability for Cancer Care Research in the Department of Defense.MilCanEpi:提高国防部癌症护理研究能力。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2023 Aug;7:e2300035. doi: 10.1200/CCI.23.00035.
3
Completeness of American Cancer Registry Treatment Data: implications for quality of care research.美国癌症登记处治疗数据的完整性:对护理质量研究的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Mar;216(3):428-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.12.016. Epub 2013 Jan 26.
4
Cost-Efficiency of Breast Cancer Care in the US Military Health System: An Economic Evaluation in Direct and Purchased Care.美国军事医疗系统中乳腺癌护理的成本效益:直接护理和购买护理的经济评估
Mil Med. 2019 Oct 1;184(9-10):e494-e501. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usz025.
5
Costs for Colon Cancer Treatment Comparing Benefit Types and Care Sources in the US Military Health System.美国军事医疗系统中结肠癌治疗成本:比较受益类型和护理来源
Mil Med. 2019 Dec 1;184(11-12):e847-e855. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usz065.
6
Using personal health insurance numbers to link the Canadian Cancer Registry and the Discharge Abstract Database.利用个人健康保险号码将加拿大癌症登记处与出院摘要数据库相链接。
Health Rep. 2015 Jun;26(6):3-11.
7
[Record linkage of a large clinical practice patient cohort with the Cancer Registry Schleswig-Holstein].[将一个大型临床实践患者队列与石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因癌症登记处进行记录链接]
Gesundheitswesen. 2011 Jul;73(7):452-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1252037. Epub 2010 Jun 14.
8
Routine practice data of three cancer entities: Comparison among cancer registry and health insurance data.三种癌症实体的常规实践数据:癌症登记处和健康保险数据的比较。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2023 Apr;177:65-72. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2023.01.001. Epub 2023 Feb 18.
9
Opportunities and obstacles in linking large health care registries: the primary secondary cancer care registry - breast cancer.链接大型医疗保健注册中心的机遇与挑战:主要二级癌症护理注册中心 - 乳腺癌。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Apr 27;22(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01601-0.
10
Ascertaining invasive breast cancer cases; the validity of administrative and self-reported data sources in Australia.确定浸润性乳腺癌病例;澳大利亚行政和自我报告数据源的有效性。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Feb 11;13:17. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-17.

引用本文的文献

1
Short-Term Outcomes of Breast Cancer Surgery by Race-Ethnicity in the Military Health System.军事医疗系统中按种族划分的乳腺癌手术短期结果
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17449-9.
2
Racial-Ethnic Comparisons in Surgical Treatment and Outcomes of Non-Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer in an Equal Access Health System.平等医疗体系中非转移性肾细胞癌外科治疗及预后的种族-民族比较
Cancer Control. 2025 Jan-Dec;32:10732748251334455. doi: 10.1177/10732748251334455. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
3
Post-diagnosis statin use and survival among head and neck cancer patients: a cohort study in a universal health care system.头颈部癌症患者诊断后他汀类药物的使用与生存情况:一项在全民医疗保健系统中的队列研究
Br J Cancer. 2025 Feb;132(3):259-265. doi: 10.1038/s41416-024-02925-y. Epub 2024 Dec 7.
4
Comparing Black and White Patients in Treatment of Advanced Prostate Cancer and Survival in an Equal Access Health System.在平等医疗体系中比较黑人和白人患者晚期前列腺癌的治疗及生存情况
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Oct 21. doi: 10.1007/s40615-024-02217-4.
5
Racial comparisons in treatment of rectal adenocarcinoma and survival in the military health system.在军队卫生系统中,直肠癌治疗和生存的种族比较。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2024 Sep 2;8(5). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkae074.
6
Racial-Ethnic Comparison of Treatment for Papillary Thyroid Cancer in the Military Health System.种族-民族比较在军事卫生系统中治疗甲状腺乳头状癌。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Nov;31(12):8196-8205. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15941-2. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
7
Pulmonary Hypertension and Survival among Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study in the U.S. Military Health System.非小细胞肺癌患者的肺动脉高压与生存率:美国军事卫生系统的一项回顾性队列研究
J Clin Med. 2024 May 30;13(11):3217. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113217.
8
Characteristics Associated With Survival in Surgically Nonresected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma in the Military Health System.与军事卫生系统中行手术非切除术的胰腺腺癌生存相关的特征。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2024 Feb 1;47(2):64-70. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001057. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
9
MilCanEpi: Increased Capability for Cancer Care Research in the Department of Defense.MilCanEpi:提高国防部癌症护理研究能力。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2023 Aug;7:e2300035. doi: 10.1200/CCI.23.00035.

本文引用的文献

1
Time-to-surgery and overall survival after breast cancer diagnosis in a universal health system.在全民健康体系中,乳腺癌诊断后的手术时间与总生存。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Nov;178(2):441-450. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05404-8. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
2
The US Military Health System: Promoting Readiness And Providing Health Care.美国军事卫生系统:促进战备和提供医疗保健。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Aug;38(8):1259-1267. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00239.
3
Determining the Cancer Diagnostic Interval Using Administrative Health Care Data in a Breast Cancer Cohort.利用行政医疗保健数据确定乳腺癌队列中的癌症诊断间隔时间。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2019 May;3:1-10. doi: 10.1200/CCI.18.00131.
4
Identifying Cancer-Directed Surgeries in Medicare Claims: A Validation Study Using SEER-Medicare Data.在医疗保险索赔中识别癌症导向手术:一项使用监测、流行病学和最终结果-医疗保险数据的验证研究
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2019 Feb;3:1-24. doi: 10.1200/CCI.18.00093.
5
Racial Differences in Time to Breast Cancer Surgery and Overall Survival in the US Military Health System.美国军事医疗体系中种族差异对乳腺癌手术时间和整体存活率的影响。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Mar 1;154(3):e185113. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.5113. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
6
Algorithm to Identify Systemic Cancer Therapy Treatment Using Structured Electronic Data.使用结构化电子数据识别全身癌症治疗方案的算法
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2017 Nov;1:1-9. doi: 10.1200/CCI.17.00002.
7
Cancer statistics, 2019.癌症统计数据,2019 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Jan;69(1):7-34. doi: 10.3322/caac.21551. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
8
Comparison of cancer diagnosis recording between the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, Cancer Registry and Hospital Episodes Statistics.临床实践研究数据链、癌症登记处和医院事件统计数据之间癌症诊断记录的比较。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2018 Dec;57:148-157. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2018.08.009. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
9
Breast Cancer, Version 4.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.《乳腺癌临床实践指南(NCCN 指南)》第 4 版 2017 年版
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018 Mar;16(3):310-320. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.0012.
10
Breast Cancer Treatment and Survival Among Department of Defense Beneficiaries: An Analysis by Benefit Type and Care Source.国防部受益人的乳腺癌治疗与生存情况:按受益类型和护理来源进行的分析
Mil Med. 2018 Mar 1;183(3-4):e186-e195. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usx031.

美国军人健康系统中癌症诊断和治疗的癌症登记和行政索赔数据的整合。

Consolidation of Cancer Registry and Administrative Claims Data on Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment in the US Military Health System.

机构信息

Murtha Cancer Center/Research Program, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD.

Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD.

出版信息

JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2020 Oct;4:906-917. doi: 10.1200/CCI.20.00043.

DOI:10.1200/CCI.20.00043
PMID:33074744
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7608597/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Linked cancer registry and medical claims data have increased the capacity for cancer research. However, few efforts have described methods to select information between data sources, which may affect data use. We developed a systematic process to evaluate and consolidate cancer diagnosis and treatment information between the linked Department of Defense Central Cancer Registry (CCR) and Military Health System Data Repository (MDR) administrative claims database, called Military Cancer Epidemiology Data System (MilCanEpi).

METHODS

MilCanEpi contains information on cancer diagnosis and treatment of patients receiving care from 1998 to 2014. We used an iterative process guided by knowledge of data features, current literature, and logical comparisons between the CCR and MDR data to evaluate and consolidate cancer diagnosis and treatment received (yes or no) and their dates. We applied the processes to breast cancer data as an example. Agreement between diagnosis and treatment dates in the two data sources was evaluated using Cohen's κ with 95% CIs.

RESULTS

In MilCanEpi, we identified 15,965 patients with a breast cancer diagnosis and 15,145 patients who underwent breast cancer surgery; 97.9% and 84.1% of patients had records in both CCR and MDR for diagnosis and surgery, respectively. Exact agreement was 13.7% for diagnosis dates (Cohen's κ = 0.14; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.14) and 68.9% for surgery dates (Cohen's κ = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.70) between the two data sources. After applying systematic processes, 98.1% of patients with a breast cancer diagnosis and 99.7% of patients with surgery had information selected for analytic data sets.

CONCLUSION

The developed processes resulted in high consolidation rates of breast cancer data in MilCanEpi and may serve as a data selection template for other tumor sites and linked data sources.

摘要

目的

癌症登记处和医疗索赔数据的关联提高了癌症研究的能力。然而,很少有研究描述在数据源之间选择信息的方法,这可能会影响数据的使用。我们开发了一种系统的方法来评估和整合关联的国防部中央癌症登记处(CCR)和军事健康系统数据存储库(MDR)行政索赔数据库之间的癌症诊断和治疗信息,称为军事癌症流行病学数据系统(MilCanEpi)。

方法

MilCanEpi 包含了 1998 年至 2014 年期间接受治疗的患者的癌症诊断和治疗信息。我们使用一种迭代过程,该过程由对数据特征、现有文献以及 CCR 和 MDR 数据之间的逻辑比较的了解来指导,以评估和整合癌症诊断和治疗的接受情况(是或否)及其日期。我们将该过程应用于乳腺癌数据作为示例。使用 Cohen's κ (95%置信区间)评估了两个数据源中诊断和治疗日期之间的一致性。

结果

在 MilCanEpi 中,我们确定了 15965 名患有乳腺癌的患者和 15145 名接受乳腺癌手术的患者;分别有 97.9%和 84.1%的患者在 CCR 和 MDR 中都有诊断和手术记录。两个数据源的诊断日期完全一致的比例为 13.7%(Cohen's κ = 0.14;95%置信区间,0.13 至 0.14),手术日期完全一致的比例为 68.9%(Cohen's κ = 0.69;95%置信区间,0.68 至 0.70)。在应用系统过程后,98.1%的乳腺癌诊断患者和 99.7%的手术患者的信息被选入分析数据集。

结论

开发的过程导致 MilCanEpi 中乳腺癌数据的整合率很高,并且可以作为其他肿瘤部位和关联数据源的数据选择模板。