• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外科实习生进行腹腔镜阑尾切除术:为时过早?

Laparoscopic Appendectomy Performed by Surgical Interns: Is it Too Early?

作者信息

Valinoti Agustin C, Dreifuss Nicolas H, Angeramo Cristian A, Schlottmann Francisco

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2020 Oct 16;31(2):223-226. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000870.

DOI:10.1097/SLE.0000000000000870
PMID:33075005
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is a common procedure among surgical trainees. However, first-year residents' involvement in this procedure is scarcely studied. We aimed to determine the safety and outcomes of LA performed by surgical interns early in their first year of surgical training.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients who underwent LA for acute appendicitis from 2006 to 2019 was performed. All patients operated by surgical interns were included. The sample was divided into 2 groups: LA performed during the first (G1) and last 3 months (G2) of their first year of residency. Demographics, operative variables, and postoperative outcomes were compared between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 2009 LA were performed during the study period; 1647 (82%) were done by surgical interns. A total of 934 LA were performed at both ends of the year; 505 belonged to G1 and 429 to G2. Each surgical intern performed a mean of 40 LA. Demographics, complicated appendicitis rates, and presence of peritonitis were comparable between groups. Operative time was longer in G1 (G1: 61 vs. G2: 52 min, P<0.0001). Major morbidity (G1: 2.1% vs. G2: 3.4%, P=0.2), postoperative intra-abdominal abscess rates (G1: 2.8% vs. G2: 2.8%, P=0.66), median length of hospital stay (G1: 1.9 vs. G2: 1.8 d, P=0.59), and readmission rates (G1: 1.6% vs. G2: 2%, P=0.73) were similar between groups. There was no mortality in the series.

CONCLUSIONS

LA can be safely performed by supervised surgical interns early in their training. Despite a longer operative time, postoperative outcomes were favorable and similar as those achieved at the end of surgical internship.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)是外科实习生常见的手术操作。然而,关于一年级住院医师参与该手术的研究却很少。我们旨在确定外科实习医生在外科培训第一年早期进行LA的安全性和手术效果。

材料与方法

对2006年至2019年期间所有因急性阑尾炎接受LA的患者进行回顾性研究。纳入所有由外科实习医生实施手术的患者。样本分为两组:在住院医师第一年的前3个月(G1)和后3个月(G2)进行的LA。比较两组患者的人口统计学资料、手术变量和术后结果。

结果

研究期间共进行了2009例LA;其中1647例(82%)由外科实习医生完成。在年初和年末共进行了934例LA;505例属于G1组,429例属于G2组。每位外科实习医生平均进行40例LA。两组患者的人口统计学资料、复杂性阑尾炎发生率和腹膜炎情况相当。G1组的手术时间更长(G1组:61分钟 vs. G2组:52分钟,P<0.0001)。两组的主要发病率(G1组:2.1% vs. G2组:3.4%,P=0.2)、术后腹腔内脓肿发生率(G1组:2.8% vs. G2组:2.8%,P=0.66)、中位住院时间(G1组:1.9天 vs. G2组:1.8天,P=0.59)和再入院率(G1组:1.6% vs. G2组:2%,P=0.73)相似。该系列中无死亡病例。

结论

在监督下,外科实习医生在培训早期即可安全地进行LA。尽管手术时间较长,但术后结果良好,与外科实习期末的结果相似。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic Appendectomy Performed by Surgical Interns: Is it Too Early?外科实习生进行腹腔镜阑尾切除术:为时过早?
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2020 Oct 16;31(2):223-226. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000870.
2
Could an abdominal drainage be avoided in complicated acute appendicitis? Lessons learned after 1300 laparoscopic appendectomies.在复杂的急性阑尾炎中能否避免腹腔引流?1300 例腹腔镜阑尾切除术后的经验教训。
Int J Surg. 2016 Dec;36(Pt A):40-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.10.013. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
3
Impact of Obesity on Surgical Outcomes of Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Lessons Learned From 2000 Cases in an Urban Teaching Hospital.肥胖对腹腔镜阑尾切除术手术结果的影响:来自城市教学医院 2000 例病例的经验教训。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2021 Feb 17;31(5):523-527. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000914.
4
Surgical and obstetrical outcomes after laparoscopic appendectomy during pregnancy: a case-matched analysis.腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗妊娠合并阑尾炎的手术和产科结局:病例对照分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Dec;304(6):1535-1540. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06201-9. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
5
Complicated appendicitis in children: is laparoscopic appendectomy appropriate? A comparative study with the open appendectomy--our experience.儿童复杂性阑尾炎:腹腔镜阑尾切除术是否合适?与开腹阑尾切除术的比较研究——我们的经验。
J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Oct;44(10):1924-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.03.037.
6
One-trocar versus multiport hybrid laparoscopic appendectomy: What's the best option for children with acute appendicitis? Results of an international multicentric study.单孔与多孔混合腹腔镜阑尾切除术:对急性阑尾炎患儿而言,最佳选择是什么?一项国际多中心研究的结果
Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):4917-4923. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4832-y. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
7
Infectious Complications After Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Pediatric Patients with Perforated Appendicitis: Is There a Difference in the Outcome Using Irrigation and Suction Versus Suction Only? Results of a Multicentric International Retrospective Study.小儿穿孔性阑尾炎腹腔镜阑尾切除术后的感染并发症:冲洗吸引与单纯吸引的结局是否存在差异?一项多中心国际回顾性研究的结果
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Oct;28(10):1266-1270. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0061. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
8
Usefulness of intraoperative culture swabs in laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎术中培养拭子的应用价值。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020 Aug;405(5):691-695. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01913-z. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
9
Complicated appendicitis--is the laparoscopic approach appropriate? A comparative study with the open approach: outcome in a community hospital setting.复杂性阑尾炎——腹腔镜手术方法是否合适?与开放手术方法的比较研究:社区医院环境下的结果
Am Surg. 2007 Aug;73(8):737-41; discussion 741-2.
10
Risk Factors for Readmission After Short-Hospital-Stay Laparoscopic Appendectomy.短期住院腹腔镜阑尾切除术后再入院的危险因素。
World J Surg. 2020 Dec;44(12):4006-4011. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05730-9. Epub 2020 Aug 13.

引用本文的文献

1
A Retrospective Study of Routine Preoperative Blood Grouping and Saving in Laparoscopic Surgeries: A Minimally Utilized Expenditure.腹腔镜手术中常规术前血型鉴定与储血的回顾性研究:一项利用极少的支出
Cureus. 2024 Sep 3;16(9):e68557. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68557. eCollection 2024 Sep.