• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Self-Collected Oral Fluid and Nasal Swabs Demonstrate Comparable Sensitivity to Clinician Collected Nasopharyngeal Swabs for Coronavirus Disease 2019 Detection.自我采集的口腔液和鼻腔拭子与临床医生采集的鼻咽拭子在检测 2019 年冠状病毒病方面具有相当的敏感性。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 2;73(9):e3106-e3109. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1589.
2
Detection of severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in outpatients: A multicenter comparison of self-collected saline gargle, oral swab, and combined oral-anterior nasal swab to a provider collected nasopharyngeal swab.门诊患者中严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 型（SARS-CoV-2）的检测：自行采集盐水漱口液、口腔拭子和联合采集口咽-前鼻拭子与医务人员采集鼻咽拭子的多中心比较。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2021 Nov;42(11):1340-1344. doi: 10.1017/ice.2021.2. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
3
Buccal swabs as non-invasive specimens for detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2.颊拭子作为非侵入性标本用于检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 型。
J Int Med Res. 2021 May;49(5):3000605211016996. doi: 10.1177/03000605211016996.
4
Self-collected unstimulated saliva, oral swab, and nasopharyngeal swab specimens in the detection of SARS-CoV-2.自我采集的非刺激唾液、口腔拭子和鼻咽拭子标本在 SARS-CoV-2 检测中的应用。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Feb;26(2):1561-1567. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04129-7. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
5
Detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 on Self-Collected Saliva or Anterior Nasal Specimens Compared With Healthcare Personnel-Collected Nasopharyngeal Specimens.与医护人员采集的鼻咽标本相比，自我采集的唾液或前鼻标本中严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 的检测。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jul 15;73(Suppl 1):S65-S73. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab330.
6
Self-collected mid-nasal swabs and saliva specimens, compared with nasopharyngeal swabs, for SARS-CoV-2 detection in mild COVID-19 patients.在轻度新冠肺炎患者中，自我采集的中鼻拭子和唾液标本与鼻咽拭子用于新冠病毒检测的比较。
J Infect. 2021 Dec;83(6):709-737. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.09.012. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
7
Self-Collected Anterior Nasal and Saliva Specimens versus Health Care Worker-Collected Nasopharyngeal Swabs for the Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2.自我采集的前鼻和唾液样本与医护人员采集的鼻咽拭子在 SARS-CoV-2 的分子检测中的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Oct 21;58(11). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01824-20.
8
Comparative evaluation of nasopharyngeal swab and saliva specimens for the molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Japanese patients with COVID-19.比较日本 COVID-19 患者鼻咽拭子和唾液标本用于 SARS-CoV-2 RNA 分子检测的效果。
J Infect Chemother. 2021 Jan;27(1):126-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2020.09.027. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
9
Sensitivity of midturbinate versus nasopharyngeal swabs for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).中鼻甲拭子与鼻咽拭子检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2（SARS-CoV-2）的敏感性。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2021 Aug;42(8):1001-1003. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.1326. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
10
Effects of Patient Characteristics on Diagnostic Performance of Self-Collected Samples for SARS-CoV-2 Testing.患者特征对 SARS-CoV-2 检测自采样本诊断性能的影响。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2021;27(8):2081-2089. doi: 10.3201/eid2708.210667.

引用本文的文献

1
Saliva Has High Sensitivity and Specificity for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Compared to Nasal Swabs but Exhibits Different Viral Dynamics from Days of Symptom Onset.与鼻拭子相比，唾液在检测新型冠状病毒2（SARS-CoV-2）方面具有高灵敏度和特异性，但从症状出现之日起其病毒动态有所不同。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jul 30;15(15):1918. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15151918.
2
Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) Nanorod Arrays-Based Organic Electrochemical Transistor for SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Detection in Artificial Saliva.基于聚（3,4-乙撑二氧噻吩）纳米棒阵列的有机电化学晶体管用于人工唾液中SARS-CoV-2刺突蛋白的检测
ACS Sens. 2025 Mar 28;10(3):2007-2018. doi: 10.1021/acssensors.4c03207. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
3
The effect of sample site and collection procedure on identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection.样本采集部位和采集程序对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2（SARS-CoV-2）感染鉴定的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 16;12(12):CD014780. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014780.
4
Impact of Mild COVID-19 History on Oral-Gut Microbiota and Serum Metabolomics in Adult Patients with Crohn's Disease: Potential Beneficial Effects.轻度新冠病史对成年克罗恩病患者口腔-肠道微生物群和血清代谢组学的影响：潜在益处
Biomedicines. 2024 Sep 14;12(9):2103. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12092103.
5
Evaluating diagnostic accuracy of an RT-PCR test for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva.评估用于检测唾液中SARS-CoV-2的逆转录聚合酶链反应（RT-PCR）检测的诊断准确性。
Diagn Progn Res. 2024 Jul 24;8(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s41512-024-00176-2.
6
Highly sensitive extraction-free saliva-based molecular assay for rapid diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2.基于唾液的高灵敏度无提取分子检测法，用于 SARS-CoV-2 的快速诊断。
J Clin Microbiol. 2024 Jun 12;62(6):e0060024. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00600-24. Epub 2024 May 24.
7
Impact of Swabbing Location, Self-Swabbing, and Food Intake on SARS-CoV-2 RNA Detection.采样部位、自行采样及食物摄入对新型冠状病毒2型RNA检测的影响
Microorganisms. 2024 Mar 15;12(3):591. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12030591.
8
The Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on the Diagnosis of COVID-19: Molecular Diagnostic Testing (December 2023).美国传染病学会关于 COVID-19 的诊断指南：分子诊断检测（2023 年 12 月）。
Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Jun 27;78(7):e385-e415. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad646.
9
Unlocking the potential of RNA-based therapeutics in the lung: current status and future directions.挖掘基于RNA的疗法在肺部的潜力：现状与未来方向。
Front Genet. 2023 Nov 23;14:1281538. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1281538. eCollection 2023.
10
Molecular Diagnosis of COVID-19; Biosafety and Pre-analytical Recommendations.新型冠状病毒肺炎的分子诊断；生物安全与分析前建议
Iran J Pathol. 2023 Summer;18(3):244-256. doi: 10.30699/IJP.2023.1988405.3061. Epub 2023 Jul 16.

自我采集的口腔液和鼻腔拭子与临床医生采集的鼻咽拭子在检测 2019 年冠状病毒病方面具有相当的敏感性。

Self-Collected Oral Fluid and Nasal Swabs Demonstrate Comparable Sensitivity to Clinician Collected Nasopharyngeal Swabs for Coronavirus Disease 2019 Detection.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Curative Inc., Menlo Park, California, USA.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 2;73(9):e3106-e3109. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1589.

DOI:10.1093/cid/ciaa1589
PMID:33075138
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7665422/
Abstract

We compared self-collected oral fluid swab specimens with and without clinician supervision, clinician-supervised self-collected anterior nasal swab specimens, and clinician-collected nasopharyngeal swab specimens for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Supervised oral fluid and nasal swab specimens performed similarly to clinician-collected nasopharyngeal swab specimens. No sample type could detect SARS-CoV-2 infections amongst all positive participants.

摘要

我们比较了有和没有临床医生监督的自我采集口腔液拭子标本、有临床医生监督的自我采集前鼻拭子标本和临床医生采集的鼻咽拭子标本，以检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2（SARS-CoV-2）。有监督的口腔液和鼻腔拭子标本与临床医生采集的鼻咽拭子标本表现相似。没有任何一种样本类型能够检测到所有阳性参与者中的 SARS-CoV-2 感染。