From the Pharmacy Department, St Paul's Hospital, Providence Health Care, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences.
Anesth Analg. 2020 Oct;131(4):1164-1172. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004730.
Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common occurrence after cardiac surgery. However, in contrast to other surgical populations, routine PONV prophylaxis is not a standard of care in cardiac surgery. We hypothesized that routine administration of a single prophylactic dose of ondansetron (4 mg) at the time of stopping postoperative propofol sedation before extubation in the cardiac surgery intensive care unit would decrease the incidence of PONV.
With institutional human ethics board approval and written informed consent, we conducted a randomized controlled trial in patients ≥19 years of age with no history of PONV undergoing elective or urgent cardiac surgery procedures requiring cardiopulmonary bypass. The primary outcome was the incidence of PONV in the first 24 hours postextubation, compared by the χ test. Secondary outcomes included the incidence and times to first dose of rescue antiemetic treatment administration, the incidence of headaches, and the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias.
PONV within the first 24 hours postextubation occurred in 33 of 77 patients (43%) in the ondansetron group versus 50 of 82 patients (61%) in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.70 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.51-0.95]; absolute risk difference, -18% [95% CI, -33 to -2]; number needed to treat, 5.5 [95% CI, 3.0-58.4]; χ test, P = .022). Kaplan-Meier "survival" analysis of the times to first rescue antiemetic treatment administration over 24 hours indicated that patients in the ondansetron group fared better than those in the placebo group (log-rank [Mantel-Cox] test; P = .028). Overall, 32 of 77 patients (42%) in the ondansetron group received rescue antiemetic treatment over the first 24 hours postextubation versus 47 of 82 patients (57%) in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.52-1.00]; absolute risk difference, -16% [95% CI, -31 to 1]); P = .047. There were no significant differences between the groups in the incidence of postoperative headache (ondansetron group, 5 of 77 patients [6%] versus placebo group, 4 of 82 patients [5%]; Fisher exact test; P = .740) or ventricular arrhythmias (ondansetron group, 2 of 77 patients [3%] versus placebo group, 4 of 82 patients [5%]; P = .68).
These findings support the routine administration of ondansetron prophylaxis at the time of discontinuation of postoperative propofol sedation before extubation in patients following cardiac surgery. Further research is warranted to optimize PONV prophylaxis in cardiac surgery patients.
术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)是心脏手术后的常见现象。然而,与其他手术人群相比,心脏手术中常规使用 PONV 预防药物并非标准护理。我们假设在心脏外科重症监护病房(CSCU)拔管前停止术后异丙酚镇静时,常规给予单次预防性昂丹司琼(4mg)剂量,将降低 PONV 的发生率。
在获得机构人类伦理委员会批准和书面知情同意的情况下,我们对 77 例年龄≥19 岁、无 PONV 病史、接受需要体外循环的择期或紧急心脏手术的患者进行了一项随机对照试验。主要结局是拔管后 24 小时内 PONV 的发生率,采用 χ 检验比较。次要结局包括首次使用止吐治疗的发生率和时间、头痛的发生率和室性心律失常的发生率。
拔管后 24 小时内 PONV 发生在昂丹司琼组的 77 例患者中的 33 例(43%)和安慰剂组的 82 例患者中的 50 例(61%)(相对风险,0.70 [95%置信区间 {CI},0.51-0.95];绝对风险差异,-18% [95% CI,-33 至-2];需要治疗的人数,5.5 [95% CI,3.0-58.4]; χ 检验,P=0.022)。拔管后 24 小时内首次使用止吐治疗的 Kaplan-Meier“生存”分析表明,昂丹司琼组患者的预后优于安慰剂组(对数秩[Mantel-Cox]检验;P=0.028)。总体而言,在昂丹司琼组的 77 例患者中,有 32 例(42%)在拔管后 24 小时内接受了止吐治疗,而在安慰剂组的 82 例患者中,有 47 例(57%)(相对风险,0.73 [95% CI,0.52-1.00];绝对风险差异,-16% [95% CI,-31 至 1]);P=0.047。两组之间术后头痛的发生率(昂丹司琼组 77 例患者中有 5 例[6%],安慰剂组 82 例患者中有 4 例[5%];Fisher 确切检验;P=0.740)或室性心律失常(昂丹司琼组 77 例患者中有 2 例[3%],安慰剂组 82 例患者中有 4 例[5%];P=0.68)均无显著差异。
这些发现支持在心脏手术后患者拔管前停止术后异丙酚镇静时常规给予昂丹司琼预防。需要进一步研究以优化心脏手术患者的 PONV 预防。