Suppr超能文献

疼痛强度作为患者改善的滞后指标:在多学科护理中与睡眠、精神困扰和功能的纵向关系。

Pain Intensity as a Lagging Indicator of Patient Improvement: Longitudinal Relationships With Sleep, Psychiatric Distress, and Function in Multidisciplinary Care.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and.

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and.

出版信息

J Pain. 2021 Mar;22(3):313-321. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2020.10.001. Epub 2020 Oct 16.

Abstract

Despite a common assumption that reductions in chronic pain intensity must precede improvements in other pain-relevant domains, there has been limited empirical inquiry into the temporal ordering of improvements in chronic pain treatment. Cross-lagged models using retrospective clinical data examined relationships between average pain intensity and symptoms of psychological distress, difficulties with sleep initiation and maintenance, and disability in 666 treatment-seeking patients with chronic pain who demonstrated improvement in pain intensity (≥1-point reduction on 0-10 numeric rating scale) over a 1-year span. Results indicated that decreased difficulties with sleep initiation, depressive and anxious symptoms, and disability predicted later improvement in pain intensity, whereas greater pain intensity predicted only later difficulties in sleep initiation and maintenance. A combined lagged model highlighted fewer baseline symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder and lower levels of baseline disability as significant predictors of later improvements in pain. Overall, our results indicate that reductions in pain intensity may not be the first factors to change in effective chronic pain management. The current findings should be replicated using prospective studies utilizing structured approaches to maximize data capture, as well as uniform interventional approaches to permit greater inferences regarding causal and temporal aspects of the model. PERSPECTIVE: This study demonstrates that pain intensity scores are not robust predictors of psychosocial outcomes longitudinally. Instead, other factors such as sleep initiation, psychological distress and disability appear to be important targets for intervention that may promote effective pain reduction.

摘要

尽管人们普遍认为慢性疼痛强度的降低必须先于其他与疼痛相关领域的改善,但对于慢性疼痛治疗中改善的时间顺序,实证研究的关注有限。使用回顾性临床数据的交叉滞后模型,考察了在 666 名寻求治疗的慢性疼痛患者中,平均疼痛强度与心理困扰症状、入睡和维持困难以及残疾之间的关系,这些患者在 1 年的时间内疼痛强度(0-10 数字评分量表上降低≥1 分)有所改善。结果表明,入睡困难、抑郁和焦虑症状以及残疾的减少预测了疼痛强度的后期改善,而疼痛强度的增加仅预测了后期入睡和维持困难。综合滞后模型强调了创伤后应激障碍的基线症状较少和基线残疾水平较低是疼痛后期改善的重要预测因素。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,在有效的慢性疼痛管理中,疼痛强度的降低可能不是首先要改变的因素。这些发现应该使用前瞻性研究来复制,这些研究采用结构化的方法来最大限度地捕捉数据,并采用统一的干预方法,以便对模型的因果和时间方面进行更深入的推断。观点:本研究表明,疼痛强度评分不是纵向预测心理社会结局的可靠指标。相反,其他因素,如入睡、心理困扰和残疾,似乎是干预的重要目标,这可能有助于有效减轻疼痛。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验