Suppr超能文献

在慢性机械性颈部疼痛患者的常规物理治疗方案中添加颈椎手法治疗的短期和中期效果。随机对照临床试验。

"Short- and mid-term effects of adding upper cervical manual therapy to a conventional physical therapy program in patients with chronic mechanical neck pain. Randomized controlled clinical trial.".

作者信息

González-Rueda Vanessa, López-de-Celis Carlos, Bueno-Gracia Elena, Rodríguez-Sanz Jacobo, Pérez-Bellmunt Albert, Barra-López Martín Eusebio, Hidalgo García César

机构信息

Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat Intenacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.

Fundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l'Atenció Primaria de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Clin Rehabil. 2021 Mar;35(3):378-389. doi: 10.1177/0269215520965054. Epub 2020 Oct 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of adding an Upper Cervical Translatoric Mobilization (UCTM) or an Inhibitory Suboccipital Technique (IST) to a physiotherapy treatment in the symptomatology and function of mechanical chronic neck pain patients.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Primary Care Center in Cornellà, Spain.

SUBJECTS

78 patients (64 women), with mean age (SD) of 59.96 (13.30) years with mechanical chronic neck pain were divided in three groups: control, IST and UCTM groups.

INTERVENTIONS

All groups received 15 physiotherapy sessions for three weeks. The UCTM and IST groups added 5 minutes of the assigned technique during six sessions.

MAIN MEASURES

Neck disability index (NDI) and numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) for neck pain were measured baseline, three-weeks and 15-weeks follow-up.

RESULTS

NDI (SD) at baseline, three-weeks and 15-weeks were 11.62 (7.08), 9.65 (6.25), 7.58 (5.64) for the control group, 14.38 (6.92), 8.50 (6.11), 7.12 (4.98) for the IST group and 13.19(7.23), 5.35(6.10), 4.35(2.76) for the UCTM group. NPRS (SD) at baseline, three-weeks and 15-weeks were 58.69 (19.46), 45.19 (23.43), 44.58 (24.08) for the control group; 64.08 (19.26), 42.19 (19.69), 34 (21.14) for the IST group; and 67.65 (20.65), 36.23 (20.10), 39.85 (25.44) for the UCTM group.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with no treatment, both forms of mobilization were associated with reduced disability at three weeks, and UCTM remained better than control at 15 weeks; there were no significant differences between the two mobilization groups.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered in Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02832232).

摘要

目的

评估在物理治疗中加入上颈椎平移松动术(UCTM)或枕下抑制技术(IST)对慢性机械性颈痛患者症状和功能的影响。

设计

随机对照试验。

地点

西班牙科尔内利亚的初级保健中心。

受试者

78例患者(64名女性),平均年龄(标准差)为59.96(13.30)岁,患有慢性机械性颈痛,分为三组:对照组、IST组和UCTM组。

干预措施

所有组均接受为期三周的15次物理治疗。UCTM组和IST组在6次治疗中增加5分钟指定技术。

主要测量指标

在基线、治疗三周和15周随访时测量颈部功能障碍指数(NDI)和颈部疼痛数字评定量表(NPRS)。

结果

对照组在基线、三周和15周时的NDI(标准差)分别为11.62(7.08)、9.65(6.25)、7.58(5.64);IST组分别为14.38(6.92)、8.50(6.11)、7.12(4.98);UCTM组分别为13.19(7.23)、5.35(6.10)、4.35(2.76)。对照组在基线、三周和15周时的NPRS(标准差)分别为58.69(19.46)、45.19(23.43)、44.58(24.08);IST组分别为64.08(19.26)、42.19(19.69)、34(21.14);UCTM组分别为67.65(20.65)、36.23(20.10)、39.85(25.44)。

结论

与不治疗相比,两种松动术形式在三周时均与残疾程度降低相关,且UCTM在15周时仍优于对照组;两种松动术组之间无显著差异。

试验注册

本研究已在Clinicaltrials.gov(NCT02832232)注册。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验